Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
14. Not really, since it was about 35 years late ...
Thu Apr 24, 2014, 05:13 PM
Apr 2014

in addressing the issues.

We were beginning to talk about income and wealth inequality back in the 80s, during the Reagan administration, when many of the practices and laws that have led to the current situation came into play, and continued after. We were talking about the financial industry and its deregulation back during the Clinton administration. Nobody talked about anything during the GW Bush administration—which is really odd, if you ask me.

It would have been better if everyone had sat up and taken notice back when we could have done something to PREVENT the financial collapse that occurred in 2008 and the already accomplished wealth concentration that exists now. The slogan made people sit up finally, which is a good thing--but it was decades late in coming, and the organization itself was not in the least bit capable of addressing real policy. It was a mess. Railing against the 1% is not particularly useful. Enacting laws (which the Dodd-Frank bill provides a good start) is.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It was suppressed by a centralized coordinated DHS effort. n/t RKP5637 Apr 2014 #1
To the extent it was an expression of rage at the kid gloves the finance folks Benton D Struckcheon Apr 2014 #2
Occupy discussed CLASS - TBF Apr 2014 #3
I think there's a tipping point it almost reached. IMO, that's why DHS infiltrated and undermined RKP5637 Apr 2014 #6
Yup. nt 2naSalit Apr 2014 #17
It helped to put on display, the brutality of the corporate state, Skeeter Barnes Apr 2014 #4
I agree. It was a step, an important step, in a ladder to what has been building all along CTyankee Apr 2014 #8
I don't know about that. Perhaps it was just a beginning. Skeeter Barnes Apr 2014 #10
I have mixed feelings about the Occupy movement. Xyzse Apr 2014 #5
Oh, but we HAVE "personalities" to rally around! warrprayer Apr 2014 #18
It never needed to be vindicated. WilliamPitt Apr 2014 #7
I love how the movement still scares the crap out of the status quo types. Rex Apr 2014 #11
Sorry, but past tense means you don't know it is still ongoing. Rex Apr 2014 #9
An invisible behind the scenes social movement hack89 Apr 2014 #12
well, let me put it this way. Occupy was one step. It is immaterial whether the average voter was CTyankee Apr 2014 #15
Occupy is but one of several threads in American culture hack89 Apr 2014 #20
I disagree. I think these are all threads of the same yarn basically...that of income inequality.... CTyankee Apr 2014 #22
Time will tell. Nt hack89 Apr 2014 #23
They've TOTALLY Changed The Narrative... WillyT Apr 2014 #13
Not really, since it was about 35 years late ... frazzled Apr 2014 #14
Yes, but I think Occupy was a REMINDER for people to sit up and take notice. It happened BECAUSE CTyankee Apr 2014 #16
The last gasp of democracy warrprayer Apr 2014 #19
It is still an ongoing necessity. Zorra Apr 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has the Occupy movement n...»Reply #14