Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
7. Excellent point and one of the problems with Medicare. We fully insure people who are
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 03:28 PM
Apr 2014

elderly. Some of these people are extremely frail, and they do not respond well to therapies that are used on younger people----and they do not need them. But, they have that insurance, and hospitals have beds to fill, and doctors are taught to do "something" not nothing. It is a brave---and unusual--- patient who is able to say "No thanks, doc. I'm 99 years old, i think I'll live with this tiny little breast cancer." My elderly father-in-law was killed by overly aggressive medical care for prostate cancer.

On the other hand, it is crime the way that we let people in their 40s and 50s who are otherwise strong and who would do well with aggressive therapy die for lack of treatment.

"Full insurance" should not be an excuse to rip someone off--I wrote a journal a long time ago about a bed ridden patient with advanced Alzheimers who died of complications after an orthopedist convinced her family that a new hip would improve her quality of life.

Lack of insurance should not be a death sentence.

Health care should not be for profit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Colon Cancer Screening Wa...»Reply #7