Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: because apparently some people think this is up for debate [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)76. Or the bars have all closed ...
and find themselves in the midst of another sexless night.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
actually. you are wrong. no does mean no. even if playing a game, there is a safe word... for no
seabeyond
May 2014
#29
we are not starting with me. but. that is a fact. no does indeed mean no. even playing a game.
seabeyond
May 2014
#54
since it was an "essentially" i was not totally clear. and i was reiterating.
seabeyond
May 2014
#62
You're the one playing semantics. No means no. If certain people want to substitute a different word
redqueen
May 2014
#61
I've noticed most of those posters come out late at night. Must feel lonely or bored...
freshwest
May 2014
#75
Well, that was my first thought, too, but I didn't want to be accused of being a man-hating '___.'
freshwest
May 2014
#77
Ah, so this is a thinly veiled callout thread. Why not include a link too while you're at it? nt
Electric Monk
May 2014
#12
If your purpose is "to see who is actually more inline with community standards" then I'm with you
Jim Lane
May 2014
#102
The "host" coupled with the quote gave me a good idea who you meant...and...
Spider Jerusalem
May 2014
#18
there is a potentially interesting discussion of the interesection of art (particularly cinema) and
el_bryanto
May 2014
#20
Nods - I guess I'm thinking along those lines because of Andrew O'Herir's article
el_bryanto
May 2014
#25
"Evenings of paying to be rejected can feel like a male version of date rape." ??????
gollygee
May 2014
#23
Yes. A few people here used to go on and on about how the president asked him to
redqueen
May 2014
#30
Surely it's true! If you can't trust a rape and pedophilia apologist then who can you trust?
redqueen
May 2014
#38
I think his comments about "family sex" (his euphemism for incest) are even worse. nt
redqueen
May 2014
#34
I heard of him when someone posted an OP about his book - The Myth of Male Power.
redqueen
May 2014
#41
I was reading that too and this person is sick and demented, surely hope NOBODY on this forum
randys1
May 2014
#47
"We have forgotten that before we began calling this date rape and date fraud,we called it excitin"?
uppityperson
May 2014
#55
ugh. It reminds me of an ex who warned me about what to expect, re-entering the dating scene
uppityperson
May 2014
#68
was that from July 2012 post as search gave me a post by him then with this in it, or more recent?
uppityperson
May 2014
#71
thanks. I am willing to give people a chance to update opinions and appreciate seeing them.
uppityperson
May 2014
#73
"No means no" is easy. What "yes" means is sometimes easy, but sometimes hard. N.T.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2014
#13
no means no. and if a yes cause she is cowardly and cannot walk beyond the societal structures that
seabeyond
May 2014
#14
Oh, lookee! He's got a book! And a website! And he lives abroad! What cool beans! PM?
freshwest
May 2014
#74
exactly, there is no interpretation to be done when a no has been spoken nt
geek tragedy
May 2014
#48
several people have endorsed the work of an author who has made that claim.
geek tragedy
May 2014
#91
In another thread, I just saw someone actually post that if anything bad happens
Jamastiene
May 2014
#92
we'lll see if the other misogynist pigs are over at discussionist or whether they're
geek tragedy
May 2014
#96