Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
there is no one that has reported on them more than Rachel Maddow. VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #1
In the primaries, I'm truly not sure. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #2
Depends on who is running... SkyDaddy7 Jun 2014 #9
EW is not going to run against Hillary.....stop dreaming.....she is friends with HRC! VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #41
You say that as if it goes without saying that HRC will sweep the primaries. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #47
she is far and away the front runner who can kick the assof any Repblican polled VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #50
Funny, you just said you weren't supporting any candidate. n/t. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #52
yeah i support the primary winner.....and she sure looks like a winner to me VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #54
She has to win them first, though. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #79
its hers for the taking right now and i am a democrat VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #191
Remember how she swept the primaries in '08? SheilaT Jun 2014 #67
Stop with the DRAMA... SkyDaddy7 Jun 2014 #190
i dont do drama.....I voted for Obama VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #193
Good one!! SkyDaddy7 Jun 2014 #195
Untrue about Maddow and irrelevant about her endorsements. JackRiddler Jun 2014 #17
and who is he? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #40
You have no reason to assume she'd back HRC in the primaries. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #48
It doesn't matter who Maddow backs. JackRiddler Jun 2014 #118
She should not be supporting any one individual candidate SheilaT Jun 2014 #20
She doesnt and neither do I. I vote for whoever wins the Primary..... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #43
I would imagine she can support whoever she chooses to at any point treestar Jun 2014 #56
If she does, I would lose respect for her too. It would mean she has sold out. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #49
Thank you, Ken Demeter Jun 2014 #3
Based on her history, she will always resist calls to repudiate, apologize, or admit error. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #5
I see the same personality flaw and strategic flaw and agree Demeter Jun 2014 #6
Has Warren "repudiated" voting Republican? KittyWampus Jun 2014 #11
I think that's what you could call everything she's done since 2011. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #14
Warren also needs to address her Republican past. Sorry. Were you around during Reagan? Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #28
OK, I respect what you're saying there Ken Burch Jun 2014 #32
All due respect Ken, equal rights under the law IS in economic issue. Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #35
Fine-ALL potential candidates should be vetted-and all should be anti-homophobia. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #46
No, the thread is not about Warren, but in this thread and all others Nay Jun 2014 #57
Not my intent here at all. n/t. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #80
I'm on your side, Ken. The issue you bring up in your OP is a valid one, Nay Jun 2014 #85
Yes, she left the Party and became a Democrat. She repudiates their economic policies sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #51
The sad part is in 2008 it made all the sense in the world nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #64
why should she? VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #44
Do you do anything but snipe? bobduca Jun 2014 #61
I tell the truth you call it sniping. But i dont blame you......I would lash out to if i was about VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #63
Your posts here sound way too arrogant and demanding. That tone won't help HRC. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #81
can she afford to "break faith" with The Family? frylock Jun 2014 #93
If you hear... doxydad Jun 2014 #4
du rec. xchrom Jun 2014 #7
One Begets The Other cantbeserious Jun 2014 #8
She's a member still? Well Warren VOTED REPUBLICAN. She WAS A REPUBLICAN. KittyWampus Jun 2014 #10
Warren has zero to do with Hillary and the Family. morningfog Jun 2014 #12
Pointing out the blatant hypocrisy of the loudest whingers is my point. KittyWampus Jun 2014 #15
So you don't want Hillary, but defend her association morningfog Jun 2014 #18
Maybe she'll draw you a map of her position. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #19
I found one. progressoid Jun 2014 #21
Have I defended Hillary's pandering? No. And I'd love to hear someone ask her KittyWampus Jun 2014 #45
OK, about this Warren thing-- Jackpine Radical Jun 2014 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Burch Jun 2014 #27
I appreciate that that is where you are at - but I don't think you speak for everybody. el_bryanto Jun 2014 #13
You fail to understand that those of us targeted by the Family are aware of her association with Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #22
You should try being honest when you represent my position, rather than distorting it. el_bryanto Jun 2014 #26
What is your position? That post was you typing about what you think OTHERS think. Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #31
I didn't speak for anybody who wasn't mean - I spoke to my impressions of the site as a whole el_bryanto Jun 2014 #34
But that doesn't fit with Le Taz Hot Jun 2014 #16
I can't find any evidence that she's a member. Do you have any? N/T Chathamization Jun 2014 #23
Read this: truebluegreen Jun 2014 #29
“Attended a prayer group that’s associated with The Family” and “member of the Family” are different Chathamization Jun 2014 #37
her autobiography has glowing words for Coe nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #60
Does her autobiography say she was a member of The Family? Excerpt? N/T Chathamization Jun 2014 #68
She attended for 15 years and has glowing words for Coe nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #69
So then the answer is "no, she's not a member of The Family"? N/T Chathamization Jun 2014 #71
The answer is *not now* nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #73
As I wrote above, she attended a prayer group that was associated with The Family. And all the Chathamization Jun 2014 #76
We are NOT talking of the prayer breakfast here nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #77
So once again, no evidence she's a member of The Family? If the charge is that she wrote glowing Chathamization Jun 2014 #78
Those you chose to applaud in your political writing nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #87
You think I won't believe something that's true about her (she's a member of the DLC) because I Chathamization Jun 2014 #92
Whatever, at this point all I can say is whatever nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #95
Sure; if you ever find evidence of her being a member of The Family, feel free to post it. N/T Chathamization Jun 2014 #97
Her praise of Coe is damming and quite frankly it is enough for me nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #98
"Whether or not the accusations are true isn't important because the person did other things I don't Chathamization Jun 2014 #100
Her words are in her book nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #102
I never disputed her words; I asked for evidence of her membership. And since you are now ignoring Chathamization Jun 2014 #103
I am not ignoring the issue nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #107
Fair enough; if you ever manage to find evidence that she is/was a member of The Family, feel free Chathamization Jun 2014 #109
Her own words nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #112
I don't think the Family issues membership cards, buddy Demeter Jun 2014 #140
"You want another president who cavorts with EVIL?" No, but all of them have for the past 60 years Chathamization Jun 2014 #144
you didn't answer the question bigtree Jun 2014 #72
Not now is the precise answer nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #75
Did you read the article? truebluegreen Jun 2014 #82
Yes. It was 4 pages long and didn't provide any evidence that she's a member of The Family. Next Chathamization Jun 2014 #91
for me the issue is religion bowens43 Jun 2014 #24
Several Methodists told me yesterday the Family is the same as Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #25
Sometimes there is a very fuzzy line between religion in general SheilaT Jun 2014 #30
Candidates who profess any philosophy or faith need to answer very specific questions Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #33
You want to criticize Hillary for involvement in "the family" because you associate it Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #36
Both are valid lines of thought, and require scrutiny. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #39
Elizabeth Warren repudiated the Republican Party and is now a Democrat. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #55
figures Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #58
"Religion is a disguise". AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #38
Non religion is a disguise. Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #59
Yes, a lack of a disguise is a disguise. AtheistCrusader Jun 2014 #66
Right. Because in this country, if you're running for office it's a huge advantage to be an atheist. Arugula Latte Jun 2014 #90
Why not? treestar Jun 2014 #53
Yea, yeah, it's not about Hillary, it's about The Family. Beacool Jun 2014 #62
And wrote glowingly about Coe in her autobiography nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #65
you're delusional if you believe an ultra-right wing cabal embraced Hillary Clinton as an associate bigtree Jun 2014 #70
Yeah, you are right, we all imagined this too nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #88
you're a reporter? bigtree Jun 2014 #94
The personal attacks by you are getting hysterical at this point nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #96
that's right. I'm attacking your integrity and truthfulness bigtree Jun 2014 #99
Yup, you are engaged in the true route of the true coward nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #101
it's hard to get a fix on you bigtree Jun 2014 #104
So I imagined her writing her praise of Coe nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #105
a quote from 1993 bigtree Jun 2014 #108
More dissembling from you nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #110
the quote proves nothing bigtree Jun 2014 #114
You are right, amateur hour nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #116
use your reporting skills for something more than gotcha politics bigtree Jun 2014 #120
When you deal with facts we can nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #121
when you present some relevant ones bigtree Jun 2014 #122
Please proceed nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #123
the quote isn't evidence of anything except that she likes the man's religiosity bigtree Jun 2014 #125
You are right, what a joke nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #126
there it is, the diversion from the subject bigtree Jun 2014 #127
A smear, based on her own words *published in 2003* nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #128
yes, you've distorted her 1993 words in a smear bigtree Jun 2014 #129
2003 are you having trouble with the years here? nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #130
that's even worse for whatever you're selling here. She described meeting Coe in 1993? bigtree Jun 2014 #131
I am selling? m'kay nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #132
selling bigtree Jun 2014 #134
Her words dear, by the way I did not say she was a member nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #135
your words bigtree Jun 2014 #136
Again, she did attend for fifteen years, more than just a prayer breakfast, nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #137
you claim she 'attended' (something) for 15 years bigtree Jun 2014 #139
Her own biography nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #141
let's see bigtree Jun 2014 #142
What part of her own bio are you still arguing against nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #143
I ask you for proof she 'attended' anything for 15 years and I get yet another song and dance bigtree Jun 2014 #145
HER OWN FRACKING BIO, that she wrote herself nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #146
so, nothing to back up your claim bigtree Jun 2014 #147
Her own biography nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #148
post the paragraph. post the text that proves your claim bigtree Jun 2014 #149
And I do not care about fanatics nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #150
you can't back your claims. Fine. Back up the one you just made bigtree Jun 2014 #152
Keep digging, please do proceed nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #153
so you can't even provide proof of your claims about me bigtree Jun 2014 #154
Keep digging nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #155
okay bigtree Jun 2014 #156
Continue the personal attacks nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #157
okay bigtree Jun 2014 #160
Please proceed nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #161
okay bigtree Jun 2014 #163
Not that it matters nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #164
that article says nothing about 'attending' something for 15 years bigtree Jun 2014 #167
You are that thick? Yes you are nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #168
'well-known' bigtree Jun 2014 #169
keep digging nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #170
okay bigtree Jun 2014 #171
Keep digging, you were alerted by another member nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #172
okay bigtree Jun 2014 #173
I am calling you what you have done nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #174
I'm calling your effort here lousy reporting bigtree Jun 2014 #175
Keep digging nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #176
okay bigtree Jun 2014 #177
I told you to your face what I believe what you are due to your behavior nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #178
that's some messed up stuff bigtree Jun 2014 #179
More personal attacks YEEPERS! nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #180
yet, you feel free to lecture me about cynicism and boosterism . . . bigtree Jun 2014 #181
Please proceed nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #182
how'd that alert work out? bigtree Jun 2014 #183
I don't play those games nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #184
The issue is hatred for Hillary Clinton BainsBane Jun 2014 #74
Maybe you should pay attention. Maybe you should WANT to know more about sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #83
I don't play fantasy presidential league BainsBane Jun 2014 #86
Not hatred...legitimate discussion. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #84
She's not a candiate BainsBane Jun 2014 #89
Wait, Hillary and "The Family" randys1 Jun 2014 #106
it's a rehash of everything that's been discussed for days here bigtree Jun 2014 #111
You have me confused with someone else, I have never heard of this before randys1 Jun 2014 #113
well read a bit, randy. You're here practically every day bigtree Jun 2014 #115
Never saw this thread here and I watch Rachel daily and read many randys1 Jun 2014 #117
take some responsibility for your own posts bigtree Jun 2014 #119
Here's link to Rachel's interview about "The Family" KoKo Jun 2014 #124
And Democrats should not associate themselves with this fascist cult, ever, in any way. nt Zorra Jun 2014 #133
K&R! Thank you. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #138
"the issue" is hatred of the female Democratic front runner and the ability to smear her like VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #151
How is she the front-runner? HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #158
Easy peasy....she has the support of the majority of Democrats AND she beats the pants off any VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #159
But she's not a candidate yet. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #162
Still the front runner... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #165
We've had a LOT of people who were "frontrunners" two years BEFORE the primaries. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #188
Its still hers if she wants it.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #166
They aren't "ideologues" Ken Burch Jun 2014 #185
People who think that "winning for winning's sake" are enthusiastic about her. Ken Burch Jun 2014 #186
Disagreement with her conservatism(centrism is conservatism)not "hatred". Ken Burch Jun 2014 #187
I say give it a rest ... sunnystarr Jun 2014 #189
K&R Jamastiene Jun 2014 #192
Mean old sexist and bigoted DU'ers hate methodists!!! bobduca Jun 2014 #194
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The issue is "The Fa...»Reply #59