Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Secret trade agreement covering 68 percent of world services published by WikiLeaks [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)29. Certainly true that agreements (trade, peace or labor) can be "good or crappy" but
the republican accusation was that they were both crappy - "flooding our markets with foreign commodities" - and negotiated secretly - "It secretly has made tariff agreements with our foreign competitors".
Reciprocal Tariff Act of 1934
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (RTAA) into law in 1934. RTAA gave the president power to negotiate bilateral, reciprocal trade agreements with other countries. This law enabled Roosevelt to liberalize American trade policy around the globe. It is widely credited with ushering in the era of liberal trade policy that persists to this day.
By giving the President the authority to negotiate these deals, the Congress effectively ceded a part of their power (authorized under US Constitution, Article I, Section VIII) to the executive branch.
After the Civil War, Democrats were generally the party of trade liberalization, while Republicans were generally for higher tariffs. This pattern was clear in congressional votes for tariffs from 1860 until 1930. Democrats were the congressional minority in the majority of Congresses between the Civil War and the election of Roosevelt. During their brief stints in the majority, Democrats passed several tariff reduction bills. Examples include the Wilson-Gorman Act of 1894 and the Underwood Tariff Act of 1913. However, subsequent Republican majorities always undid these unilateral tariff reductions.
... the administration decided to take advantage of having a Democratic-controlled Congress and Presidency to push through the RTAA. In 1936 and 1940, the Republican Party ran on a platform of repealing the tariff reductions secured under the RTAA.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_Tariff_Act
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act (RTAA) into law in 1934. RTAA gave the president power to negotiate bilateral, reciprocal trade agreements with other countries. This law enabled Roosevelt to liberalize American trade policy around the globe. It is widely credited with ushering in the era of liberal trade policy that persists to this day.
By giving the President the authority to negotiate these deals, the Congress effectively ceded a part of their power (authorized under US Constitution, Article I, Section VIII) to the executive branch.
After the Civil War, Democrats were generally the party of trade liberalization, while Republicans were generally for higher tariffs. This pattern was clear in congressional votes for tariffs from 1860 until 1930. Democrats were the congressional minority in the majority of Congresses between the Civil War and the election of Roosevelt. During their brief stints in the majority, Democrats passed several tariff reduction bills. Examples include the Wilson-Gorman Act of 1894 and the Underwood Tariff Act of 1913. However, subsequent Republican majorities always undid these unilateral tariff reductions.
... the administration decided to take advantage of having a Democratic-controlled Congress and Presidency to push through the RTAA. In 1936 and 1940, the Republican Party ran on a platform of repealing the tariff reductions secured under the RTAA.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_Tariff_Act
FDR's RTAA is what gave us "secret trade deals" and 'fast track' for their approval or rejection by Congress.
The complaints against FDR in 1936 were quite similar to the complaints against Obama today even though times and the nature of the agreements has changed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Secret trade agreement covering 68 percent of world services published by WikiLeaks [View all]
LiberalElite
Jun 2014
OP
We're winning the race and we're dragging the rest of the industrialized world with us.
Enthusiast
Jun 2014
#59
Threads on this subject tend to sink -- Tiger Beat and sexual disractions are much more interesting
Armstead
Jun 2014
#2
Exactly. Thank you. They're attempting the obligatory taking over of the world that
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#45
In 1936 Republicans accused FDR of making "secret" trade deals with "our foreign competitors".
pampango
Jun 2014
#4
Certainly true that agreements (trade, peace or labor) can be "good or crappy" but
pampango
Jun 2014
#29
We have to get Senate candidates on the record against this before November.
Omaha Steve
Jun 2014
#12
The Oligarchy is attempting to enslave the entire planet. The fact that that is not
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2014
#40
With so many Nations behind this where would I or anyone move to live less
misterhighwasted
Jun 2014
#41
No ratification necessary. The top CEO's of the New World Order decide for us all.
misterhighwasted
Jun 2014
#56
What would motivate President Obama, a Constitutional Lawyer, to sell out this Nation in such a way.
misterhighwasted
Jun 2014
#57
I think there is something to your idea about the selection. The oligarchs seem to recognize that
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#62
True. Whomever will assure the forward movement of their superior plan, gets the Presidential Crown.
misterhighwasted
Jun 2014
#66
In the Netflix series "Scandal" B613 is an organization that is dedicated to keep our Republic free.
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#67
Oh yes. You are describing exactly what I personally believe is going on.
misterhighwasted
Jun 2014
#68
Gen Clapper has no problem lying to Congress, he knows they are powerless to do anything
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#69
Seems a very vocal group here is avoiding this thread. Can we assume they support the TPP? nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#65
Well it's good to see you participate in this thread. I didnt think any of your GROUP
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#74
No it sucks, but I don't see the point of rehashing it. LOL, that is a bizarre assumption, wow.
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#76
Those that all seem to relish posting in the dreadful "Hate Snowden" posts seem to be the same ones
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#77
I never said anything bad about Snowden- so apparently you profiled me based on faulty info- and
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#78
I apologize if I made assumptions about you. But I submit you have the irony reversed.
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#82
Because I don't like to see the word c***t directed at women here, you pegged me as the enemy.
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#83
Whoooow. What are you talking about? I am with you all the way. Where did that all come from? nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#85
Your behavior- the list making me worthless, the crazy assumptions hurled....
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#86
what is really sad is having all these bizarre accusations flung at me! I made it to "our group"
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#88
Apparently some believe the policies that the president advocates can never be criticized.
Enthusiast
Jun 2014
#73
Sadly they are too afraid to stand up for themselves whichever way they stand. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#75