Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
60. considering the sh** that chealsea has put up with
Tue Jun 24, 2014, 11:21 AM
Jun 2014

I just rolled my eyes.. compared to what. Hannity doesn't do any reporting how much does he make?? beside he just sits there

to answer your question: no, people don't check sources OKNancy Jun 2014 #1
I think you are right, sad but true. nt arthritisR_US Jun 2014 #61
I think the real problem is that many many voters - not DUers - will only see the spin. djean111 Jun 2014 #2
It's what DUers do... SidDithers Jun 2014 #3
They are attacking the Obama kids in a separate thread. JoePhilly Jun 2014 #9
oh no they're not. but good job misrepresenting that thread and OP cali Jun 2014 #15
Feeling defensive are you? JoePhilly Jun 2014 #19
How about a link? n/t A Simple Game Jun 2014 #37
not at all, dear. I used my post because it's representative of the tone of the cali Jun 2014 #38
I like the phony use of terms of endearment JoePhilly Jun 2014 #74
oh for pity's sake cali Jun 2014 #79
... and? JoePhilly Jun 2014 #86
and so, I feel qualified to speak on being both privileged and poor. cali Jun 2014 #87
This place is not nearly as bad as the new forum. You mates are tame and arthritisR_US Jun 2014 #63
Sorry, but fail. We are all adults with life experience enough to recognize that Bonobo Jun 2014 #4
Basically it's all about perception. You already have a negative view of the Clintons, so you assume Metric System Jun 2014 #5
The reverse is equally true. Bonobo Jun 2014 #11
"Not fully cognizant of the real hardships that most people face" betsuni Jun 2014 #14
I love when people say that. Bonobo Jun 2014 #18
I know. It's silly. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #21
I knew you were going to do that! betsuni Jun 2014 #30
You got a real inferiority complex. Bonobo Jun 2014 #40
I think you missed the point of that response ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #51
I have NO IDEA what you are talking about. Bonobo Jun 2014 #55
Okay. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #59
Jenna Bush Scarsdale Jun 2014 #49
Is it really ridiculous to ask for the information that informs one's opinion? eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #46
information is not evidence. Come on... nt Bonobo Jun 2014 #47
Sure it is ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #58
No. Evidence may be a type of information, but Bonobo Jun 2014 #62
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #64
The evidence is the words this controversy is about. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #36
No. It's about Chelsea's words and the huge difference between what rich people JDPriestly Jun 2014 #35
Context... Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2014 #10
THANK YOU! betsuni Jun 2014 #12
Some of the most miserable people I know The Green Manalishi Jun 2014 #20
Tucker Carlson Scarsdale Jun 2014 #52
She's talking from eight miles high BeyondGeography Jun 2014 #13
That is the first time I have seen her words. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #33
That's not what I got from it at all. surrealAmerican Jun 2014 #53
but she has the CHOICE to not care about money Skittles Jun 2014 #96
lots of people want to grow up to emulate their parents. cali Jun 2014 #39
your suggesting she should have gotten a job with a hedge fund as a teenager? HA bettyellen Jun 2014 #77
uh no, and of course I said nothing remotely like that, dear bettyellen. cali Jun 2014 #78
well you suggested her money chasing rebellion should have happened as a teen- so what exactly was bettyellen Jun 2014 #80
no I did not. gad. reading comprehension. cali Jun 2014 #84
oh, it's an over simplistic generalization used to imply she is lying about her reasons for choosing bettyellen Jun 2014 #85
The interesting thing (to me) is ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2014 #56
A lot easier is just to say a career in finance just wasn't a good fit. TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #88
Notice money in () Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2014 #89
That would change the context zero percent TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #92
Actually, your quote IS inaccurate... JHB Jun 2014 #25
It's the same. Bonobo Jun 2014 #26
So I suppose if you asked someone that quit being a chef why they quit and they said Chathamization Jun 2014 #31
Followed by "That wasn't the metric of success I wanted..." JHB Jun 2014 #32
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU betsuni Jun 2014 #6
I had a thought this morning while posting in another thread - TBF Jun 2014 #7
You mean sort of like censoring things to repeat one's own version of the Democratic Party line. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #28
The Article Does 4Q2u2 Jun 2014 #45
No that's not what I meant - TBF Jun 2014 #83
It's been broken since at least 2009. Bobbie Jo Jun 2014 #8
Yeah, reminds me of the “Gore said he invented the internet” lie. Chathamization Jun 2014 #16
This is true about almost every subject mainer Jun 2014 #17
Context is everything. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2014 #22
The only thing they read was the word "Clinton" and off they went. Beacool Jun 2014 #23
Yeah that article didn't seem very fairly written gollygee Jun 2014 #24
Marie Antoinette did not say "Let them eat cake" either. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #27
Today's version of that from the clueless wealthy is 'Let them eat fake'. n/t Whisp Jun 2014 #44
A person's values aren't dictated by how much money they have. cheapdate Jun 2014 #29
I have NEVER met a poor person who didn't have huge anxiety about money cali Jun 2014 #43
Well, I have met poor people whose values were centered around things other than money. cheapdate Jun 2014 #66
I am an old hippie. commune ties still there. cali Jun 2014 #68
Screw you, too. cheapdate Jun 2014 #70
not what I said, but oh well. I expect nothing more from someone who claims cali Jun 2014 #72
Actually, they are Marrah_G Jun 2014 #50
thanks, Marrah. that claim is so ridiculous and maddening. cali Jun 2014 #69
That's not the proper understanding of social science research. cheapdate Jun 2014 #73
when it comes to the clintons, some people's brains turn off completely (in both directions) La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2014 #34
+1 n/t tammywammy Jun 2014 #67
I used to think it was only rightwingers who hated JaneyVee Jun 2014 #41
Yep and now all the corporate media spin is on HC's money Iliyah Jun 2014 #54
$600,000 a year packman Jun 2014 #42
Yup Marrah_G Jun 2014 #48
I will point this out, since you seem not to get it, nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #57
+1 davidpdx Jun 2014 #93
considering the sh** that chealsea has put up with PatrynXX Jun 2014 #60
yes, she had shit- and great privilege as well. cali Jun 2014 #75
Well, thanks for more spin. Orsino Jun 2014 #65
This is how truly privileged people (and their hangers on) think about themselves... nt Romulox Jun 2014 #71
Thank you. JNelson6563 Jun 2014 #76
Long before this brouhaha... ljm2002 Jun 2014 #81
How much did she make there I wonder? It also occurs to me that maybe, perhaps maybe, Dragonfli Jun 2014 #94
yeah, if they had a Dean scream moment, some here would be the first to attack for it bettyellen Jun 2014 #82
Is the issue of white privilege irrelevant here? nt Bonobo Jun 2014 #90
privilege is something every candidate has obtained along their way to the nomination, so...... bettyellen Jun 2014 #91
Thanks, JHB. What's going on here is disgusting. Hekate Jun 2014 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re:Chelsea Clinton: Did p...»Reply #60