Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Re:Chelsea Clinton: Did peoples' spin-detectors suddenly short out? [View all]cali
(114,904 posts)87. and so, I feel qualified to speak on being both privileged and poor.
in other words I know what it's like to grow up in the 1%. I'm sure your experience as a poor kid gives you a perspective too, but it's different from mine. I admire President Obama and the First Lady for wanting their kids to understand their privilege and get that other people have a vastly different experience. I have never said anything remotely like the shit you're making up.
You tried to say that I said something I didn't. You do that a lot. It's dog poop. and nothing but that stinking substance.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think the real problem is that many many voters - not DUers - will only see the spin.
djean111
Jun 2014
#2
Basically it's all about perception. You already have a negative view of the Clintons, so you assume
Metric System
Jun 2014
#5
Is it really ridiculous to ask for the information that informs one's opinion? eom.
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2014
#46
No. It's about Chelsea's words and the huge difference between what rich people
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#35
your suggesting she should have gotten a job with a hedge fund as a teenager? HA
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#77
well you suggested her money chasing rebellion should have happened as a teen- so what exactly was
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#80
oh, it's an over simplistic generalization used to imply she is lying about her reasons for choosing
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#85
So I suppose if you asked someone that quit being a chef why they quit and they said
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#31
You mean sort of like censoring things to repeat one's own version of the Democratic Party line.
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#28
Well, I have met poor people whose values were centered around things other than money.
cheapdate
Jun 2014
#66
when it comes to the clintons, some people's brains turn off completely (in both directions)
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#34
This is how truly privileged people (and their hangers on) think about themselves... nt
Romulox
Jun 2014
#71
How much did she make there I wonder? It also occurs to me that maybe, perhaps maybe,
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#94
yeah, if they had a Dean scream moment, some here would be the first to attack for it
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#82
privilege is something every candidate has obtained along their way to the nomination, so......
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#91