Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)

8. Appears not. They can only forbid stuff the SCOTUS doesn't like

Reply to Coventina (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 30, 2014, 10:44 AM

Jun 2014

From Scotus blog:

Here is a further attempt at qualification: This decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to mean that all insurance mandates, that is for blood transfusions or vaccinations, necessarily fail if they conflict with an employer's religious beliefs.
- See more at: http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_opinions__June_30_2014?Page=2#sthash.uEXdNi2n.dpuf

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question about the SCOTUS decision on Hobby Lobby [View all] madamesilverspurs Jun 2014 OP

Only female employees I believe el_bryanto Jun 2014 #1

And wives of male employees. nt Ilsa Jun 2014 #13

And female offspring that are still on parent's policy until age 26. Lars39 Jun 2014 #15

And is the group that needs coverage the most. Ilsa Jun 2014 #16

Indeed Lars39 Jun 2014 #17

Only female employees from everything I see Bettie Jun 2014 #2

My question: can a "Closely held" Buddhist company forbid any medical treatment tested on animals? Coventina Jun 2014 #3

Per Scotusblog mcar Jun 2014 #7

Appears not. They can only forbid stuff the SCOTUS doesn't like Orangepeel Jun 2014 #8

So anything that MEN might also alsame Jun 2014 #12

Yeah, I noticed that. If anybody wonders what this is all about, that's Nay Jun 2014 #18

Only female employees' contraception mcar Jun 2014 #4

No dsc Jun 2014 #5

Not answered in the case. MohRokTah Jun 2014 #6

Can the ACA somehow just provide birth control to anyone who wants it, outside of private djean111 Jun 2014 #9

The decision appears to say so, but of course, congress will block it Orangepeel Jun 2014 #14

Think woman need equal representation in Congress, or the court? Johonny Jun 2014 #10

If republicans want a free market fight C_U_L8R Jun 2014 #11