Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(41,975 posts)
110. If you take racism as a concept
Sun Jul 13, 2014, 04:06 PM
Jul 2014

And follow history, I think you'll see what I'm mean. I once took a class where the prof thought that modern racism could be traced to the English defeat of the Spanish Armada-- interesting theory, but the point being American Racism had had it's own journey, is unique in it's own way, as opposed to the fear of difference that seems to have always existed with origins in the fear of the other

American Blacks are huge recipients of this, as are Latinos (who actually out number Blacks at this time) but African Americans have become unwilling symbols of racism. Take any oppressed or objectified group, and you will find arguments comparing it to the African American experience of racism. While this might be acceptable in a legal sense, I don't find it acceptable in the personal sense. However, I'm white and can't speak for POC.

Now, drop my white ass in the middle of China, and if I experience racism, It would be nice to say it's 'pure' racism, I'm not the dominant culture or color. Bit it's still leaving out a hell of a lot of history and western, white influences--but at least it won't be American racism

Here's a short interesting article:

by George M. Fredrickson

Racism exists when one ethnic group or historical collectivity dominates, excludes, or seeks to eliminate another on the basis of differences that it believes are hereditary and unalterable. An ideological basis for explicit racism came to a unique fruition in the West during the modern period. No clear and unequivocal evidence of racism has been found in other cultures or in Europe before the Middle Ages. The identification of the Jews with the devil and witchcraft in the popular mind of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries was perhaps the first sign of a racist view of the world. Official sanction for such attitudes came in sixteenth century Spain when Jews who had converted to Christianity and their descendents became the victims of a pattern of discrimination and exclusion.

The period of the Renaissance and Reformation was also the time when Europeans were coming into increasing contact with people of darker pigmentation in Africa, Asia, and the Americas and were making judgments about them. The official rationale for enslaving Africans was that they were heathens, but slave traders and slave owners sometimes interpreted a passage in the book of Genesis as their justification. Ham, they maintained, committed a sin against his father Noah that condemned his supposedly black descendants to be "servants unto servants." When Virginia decreed in 1667 that converted slaves could be kept in bondage, not because they were actual heathens but because they had heathen ancestry, the justification for black servitude was thus changed from religious status to something approaching race. Beginning in the late seventeenth century laws were also passed in English North America forbidding marriage between whites and blacks and discriminating against the mixed offspring of informal liaisons. Without clearly saying so, such laws implied that blacks were unalterably alien and inferior.

During the Enlightenment, a secular or scientific theory of race moved the subject away from the Bible, with its insistence on the essential unity of the human race. Eighteenth century ethnologists began to think of human beings as part of the natural world and subdivided them into three to five races, usually considered as varieties of a single human species. In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, however, an increasing number of writers, especially those committed to the defense of slavery, maintained that the races constituted separate species.

The Nineteenth century was an age of emancipation, nationalism, and imperialism--all of which contributed to the growth and intensification of ideological racism in Europe and the United States. Although the emancipation of blacks from slavery and Jews from the ghettoes received most of its support from religious or secular believers in an essential human equality, the consequence of these reforms
More: http://www.pbs.org/race/000_About/002_04-background-02-01.htm
Why Reverse Racism Isn't Real [View all] PeaceNikki Jul 2014 OP
So these riots were not racist then? Kurska Jul 2014 #1
Click the link and keep reading. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #4
I have no idea where you got the idea there had to be a "system" of racism for it to be racism. Kurska Jul 2014 #5
Then perhaps take a cue from the article and listen and learn. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #6
I don't think your article is a more credible source for the definition of words than the dictionary Kurska Jul 2014 #7
yuck it up. I'm not sure what's so ROFL hilarious about asking people to listen and learn PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #9
Empathy for what? Claiming that certain actions aren't racist, because of skin color of the doer? Kurska Jul 2014 #13
It sure isn't funny... Hofbrau Jul 2014 #104
The is only one "brand" of racism ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #113
I'm sure Native Americans are on your side ryan_cats Jul 2014 #126
I'm pretty sure you think that snark is on point ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #132
Native Americans are "people of color" PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #133
I don't think your article is a more credible source for the definition of words than the dictionary AlbertCat Jul 2014 #28
Actually ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #64
The author made clear in context that racism was being defined in this piece as institutional Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #90
Very true and Sadly, also, very true ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #115
Wish I could rec a post wryter2000 Jul 2014 #117
The author made clear in context that racism was being defined in this piece as institutional AlbertCat Jul 2014 #136
Yes you did. Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #143
So linguists are a more credible source for a definition ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #53
Well, first off linguists don't write dictionaries. Lexicographers do. Kurska Jul 2014 #61
You are correct, Lexicographers not Linguists ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #67
They don't agree with it, because that isn't how the word is used by vast majority of people. Kurska Jul 2014 #69
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #79
I love how you ignored the entire middle part of my post. Which was the substance of my argument. Kurska Jul 2014 #86
"the vast majority of people do not agree with the definition of racism you're advocating. " alp227 Jul 2014 #105
And, "the vast majority of people" haven't studied ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #118
From here on out war is only defined as a state of conflict... Hofbrau Jul 2014 #123
Jesus - what kind of response is that? el_bryanto Jul 2014 #150
So what is the word, then, for systemic, institutional and pervasive oppression and discrimination Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #11
I'm not sure, but I agree. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #12
Yes I do have a valid point. Here's the thing, if any individual expresses animus Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #16
Yep, racist whites in South Africa are just as reprehensible as racist whites in the USA, Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #37
Black control in South Africa if you can call it that, has existed for a hot minute if that? politicaljunkie41910 Jul 2014 #57
20+ years, actually. Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #78
Not to quibble; but ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #62
Yep, that's my point. Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #75
Actually, the refining of definitions ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #59
You note that I posed a question, which went unanswered. Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #189
I think I touched on it here ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #190
I love this post man, and I commented on it upthread, I am behind the times today.... Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #193
Just as you stated in your OP, everytime one tries to have a conversation about racism politicaljunkie41910 Jul 2014 #41
This one started in the OP... Hofbrau Jul 2014 #108
So how exactly are we white people disadvantaged or oppressed in American society? nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #137
The painfully obvious point... Hofbrau Jul 2014 #161
I just don't like seeing people use "Racism goes both ways!" as an excuse for false equivalencies. nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #163
Likes and dislikes don't play into the equation... Hofbrau Jul 2014 #164
What "current bad behavior" would that be? Other than individuals being assholes? nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #165
I would suggest that excusing racist behavior... Hofbrau Jul 2014 #187
I don't see specific examples of that, but I will agree that rudeness and unkindness shouldn't be nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #195
Fascinating verbal gerrymandering. What's it for? DirkGently Jul 2014 #97
Racism is the privileging of one racial group over another. But people of any race can play into it. nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #138
No. Racism is racial animus of any kind. Institutional racism DirkGently Jul 2014 #148
The problem is people use false equivalencies to obscure who is actually impacted by racism. nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #149
That's true and a fine point. It does not, DirkGently Jul 2014 #151
"the idea that it's really okay for anyone outside the dominant cultural group to BE hateful and nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #152
Anyone can be racist. It serves no purpose to pretend otherwise. DirkGently Jul 2014 #155
"...pretending individual racial animus magically exists only in the dominant group." nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #158
Some folks want to have it both ways AgingAmerican Jul 2014 #154
Actually we do have a word for number 2 Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #177
and please know I'm right there beside you every time I see it happening here PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #14
Oh I know that. Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #31
As best I can tell ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #54
I'm wondering along with you the relevance and value of what the author is trying to do here. stevenleser Jul 2014 #162
Nobody is saying the bias can't be bias gollygee Jul 2014 #174
Maybe that is not what they are trying to say, but it has that connotation. It's dismissive. stevenleser Jul 2014 #175
I really wish someone would explore this further ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #185
Such a term would be found by LGBT people of color, women in particular I'd guess Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #192
As I typically defer to the LGBT community on matters of sexuality ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #194
You have a strong case. sulphurdunn Jul 2014 #42
I can recognize when someone is looking for a fight rather than an honest discussion. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #43
+1 ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #121
And then it just turns into a snark-fest to see who can get the nastiest dig in. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #125
+1000000 Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #179
Yet, liberals claim to value scholarship ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #181
ironclad case is more like it heaven05 Jul 2014 #55
But if the fundamental underlying assumption of the article can't be questioned mythology Jul 2014 #144
Oh Kurska, don't you know that language is meaningless Android3.14 Jul 2014 #27
I have never stated, nor did the article, that "only white people are capable of bigotry" PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #29
"dismissing the systematic and institutional factors of oppressed groups" no one is doing this Kurska Jul 2014 #63
The poorly made point is that only white people are capable of racism... Hofbrau Jul 2014 #109
Actually, You've hit on an important point ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #124
According to this JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #34
lol PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #38
I couldn't resist JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #73
Again, why is your definition more valid than the definition found in every single dictionary? n/t Kurska Jul 2014 #52
See post #35 JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #70
Dictionaries only reflect common usage. gollygee Jul 2014 #74
Hee hee. So apropos. n/t JimDandy Jul 2014 #72
Oh great ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #127
Yeppers! JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #145
And the follow-up Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #180
Yep and we need to keep JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #182
The OP article did not 'make that up'. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #99
Sociologists define two types of racism AgingAmerican Jul 2014 #156
You hit number 4 Capt. Obvious Jul 2014 #173
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #48
Thank you. Corrected. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #50
So, why is your definition of racism better than the one in the dictionary? n/t Kurska Jul 2014 #51
Not MY definition ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #128
You never answered my post up thread. n/t Kurska Jul 2014 #129
Which one? The one where you answered ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #135
No I asked you why the definition was actually better than the previous one. Kurska Jul 2014 #147
The idea that racism is bigotry + institutional/structural power ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2014 #169
This ^^^^^^ jen63 Jul 2014 #146
I think the movie JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #83
Oh look, it's Kurska Scootaloo Jul 2014 #131
Oh boy, that person with the pony avatar Kurska Jul 2014 #188
Are you arguing some kind of "tit for tat," or what? nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #142
Rosenbaum was targeted because of his minority status (Orthodox Jew) REP Jul 2014 #171
It was racism, but not reverse racism Bad Thoughts Jul 2014 #186
I agree that there is no such thing as "reverse racism", and never use the term myself. Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #2
getting real old heaven05 Jul 2014 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author alp227 Jul 2014 #100
Except white people (at least in the U.S.) have never been systematically oppressed or discriminated nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #139
Both racism and sexism are systemic. ananda Jul 2014 #3
externalized by orders from above reddread Jul 2014 #22
"...a backlash projection invented by whites who don't want to look inward..." nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #140
It Really Legitimizes a Point of View On the Road Jul 2014 #8
the article is really addressing institutional racism cali Jul 2014 #21
"White people are mean" is a racist statement. merrily Jul 2014 #10
there is no reverse institutional racism against white people cali Jul 2014 #19
I am assuming that your claim only applies to the USA? (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #39
yes. cali Jul 2014 #111
I think you could suggest a number of other countries Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #183
We know who it isnt reddread Jul 2014 #15
Racism and sexism are to "affirmative action". . . DinahMoeHum Jul 2014 #17
exactly. there is no reverse institutional racism cali Jul 2014 #18
Please be careful, Nikki Shemp Howard Jul 2014 #20
I think the larger point isn't the semantics of the word, but the general idea that PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #23
Simply using the term 'reverse racism' is an acknowledgement by the user that Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #24
+1000 smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #92
People often confuse a racist with malaise Jul 2014 #25
Are the dictionaries wrong? Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #33
It's possible JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #35
+1000 heaven05 Jul 2014 #45
Why yes, they are. Starry Messenger Jul 2014 #66
Great tumblr post there. gollygee Jul 2014 #76
That's hysterical! JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #80
lol, thanks for that. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #84
haha, that's perfect. nt laundry_queen Jul 2014 #106
WHOA. Noah Webster was "a hardxcore american nationalist and christian"? Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #122
Like you'd care. Starry Messenger Jul 2014 #130
fucking GREAT!!!!! heaven05 Jul 2014 #170
NO - a racist does believe in that doctrine malaise Jul 2014 #56
no, but they're too shallow for a full understanding of society. alp227 Jul 2014 #101
Racism is practiced by racists AgingAmerican Jul 2014 #157
Thank you PeaceNikki for trying to educate people today in a concise, thorough and rationally politicaljunkie41910 Jul 2014 #26
when white male Christians start yelling about "reverse racism" mountain grammy Jul 2014 #30
Reverse racism.... davidthegnome Jul 2014 #32
Tim Wise wrote a great piece about it that he republished during the Trayvon Martin murder PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #36
There's a lot in there, but right here's the answer to claims of reverse racism: Iggo Jul 2014 #40
thank you heaven05 Jul 2014 #44
I truly and honestly strive to be a better ally to PoC, LGBT and the poor. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #46
Of course there is no reverse racism, A Simple Game Jul 2014 #47
one is a racist taking advantage of heaven05 Jul 2014 #60
I think there's a lot of arguing sulphurdunn Jul 2014 #58
rarely unintentional heaven05 Jul 2014 #65
I agree JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #88
I believe racism has enjoyed a resurgence in this country due to the demonization of Dustlawyer Jul 2014 #68
Don't apologize. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #71
Excellent shared experience JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #91
I have NEVER understood how anyone can believe in "reverse racism" ismnotwasm Jul 2014 #77
not really qazplm Jul 2014 #89
If you take racism as a concept ismnotwasm Jul 2014 #110
+1. The term "reverse racism" is absurd (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #120
Same people who believe in the War on Christmas geek tragedy Jul 2014 #172
INSTITUTIONAL Racism is systemic. Individual Racism is, well, individual. KittyWampus Jul 2014 #81
I think the dictionary definition has been addressed well upthread. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #82
You are being pedantic. There is great benefit in pointing out institutional racism is KittyWampus Jul 2014 #87
This is why it seems weird to me to use the word "racist" as a noun at all gollygee Jul 2014 #94
I do not believe all racism has to come from a position of power. Jenoch Jul 2014 #85
PoC - People of Color... Because white people are colorless. gtar100 Jul 2014 #93
what's your preference? are you familiar with the etymology of the phrase? PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #134
I love how people want to redefine racism. area51 Jul 2014 #95
And I dislike the way so many are so stuck on the term/word that that ignore the larger PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #96
This thread is depressing. boston bean Jul 2014 #168
It truly is. I expected some deflection/diversion, but not as much as I see. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #178
I think that the problem is the title. FBaggins Jul 2014 #184
And there's number 4 again in this thread Capt. Obvious Jul 2014 #176
Racism exists when someone AgingAmerican Jul 2014 #98
In my experience people with weak arguments tend to debate semantics wcast Jul 2014 #102
You nailed it JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #166
Great quote! You are so right. wcast Jul 2014 #167
She lost it in the second paragraph... Hofbrau Jul 2014 #103
It is a self serving definition AgingAmerican Jul 2014 #114
there's no such thing as "reverse racism" TorchTheWitch Jul 2014 #107
+1 (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #112
I can't believe we still have to discuss this wryter2000 Jul 2014 #116
No shit ismnotwasm Jul 2014 #119
+1. Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #160
Racism is a individual trait. Takket Jul 2014 #141
There is no "reverse racism" because the reverse of racism isn't someone else being a bigot too. TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #153
"I think asians are harder working and smarter than whites" is edgy, cheeky and fun. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2014 #159
Bugs, berries, and boats WatermelonRat Jul 2014 #191
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Reverse Racism Isn't ...»Reply #110