Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WestCoastLib

(442 posts)
1. Interesting read.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 02:36 AM
Jul 2014

I agree with much of it, but I do think you paint with a bit of too broad a brush. I have known a large number of lifelong republicans that left the party when Bush was in office and voted for Kerry/Obama. Though, they are certainly "conservative" they want nothing to do with what is going on with the teaparty or current GOP. They don't embody most of what you suggest. The point is that there is hope for many of them yet.

However, there is no question that liberal ideas are generally responsible for progress. It's the ideal that looks to the future while conservatives clong to the past.

What I've never understood is how you can support ideas that you know time and again are going to end up being on the wrong side of history. You can't stop progress, you can only slow it down. Why not support trying to make the future the best it can possibly be, rather than simply try to put up roadblocks to progress?

Fortunately I don't know a lot of social conservatives. Fiscal consevatives are pretty much motivated by greed which is bad enough, but at least they are genrally honest about it.





Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who We Are (A Rumination)»Reply #1