Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: British Spy Agency: We Don't Need Warrant for Americans' Data. We Have 'Arrangements' [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)9. Don't even start. Seriously.
Last edited Wed Oct 29, 2014, 04:18 PM - Edit history (1)
I know, the defensive spin *must* be issued....
But MY LORD what insulting drivel.
" Do these 'arrangements' have to do with specific suspects, perhaps?"
Good god. They have access to EVERYTHING. There is no excuse for that. Hell, there is no excuse for our OWN government to have the vast, vast majority of this information. How DARE they hand it out like Halloween candy to BRITISH SPY AGENCIES? (not to mention sharing with contractors, corporations, the DEA, and Goldman Sachs knows who else...)"What other solution would anyone suggest"?!!!11!!1!
Solution to what? That's the cherry on top, seriously. When you want to defend the indefensible, pretend it's the only possible response to an imagined problem. Somehow, the USA managed for all these years without engaging in mass spying on Americans; creating detailed databases of Americans' private daily lives, associations, and communications; and handing it all to British Spy agencies. But gosh, what other SOLUTION could there be?![]()
Yeah, Hitler called what he was doing a (final) "solution," too... Every nascent authoritarian state pretends to be coming up with "solutions."
You, of course, will respond with more of the same here, because having the last word is the unwritten rule for diversion and message control.
I won't be feeding your nonsense further, and I hope no one else does, either. But I just had to underscore how silly and absolutely insulting to all of DU these talking points have become.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

British Spy Agency: We Don't Need Warrant for Americans' Data. We Have 'Arrangements' [View all]
Octafish
Oct 2014
OP
Keep this on top. Our government has no right to be making "ARRANGEMENTS" like this.
woo me with science
Oct 2014
#4
If they have to do with "specific suspects" then there is probable cause to get a warrant.
yellowcanine
Oct 2014
#13
So let's join in with DNI CLAPPER leading his arrangement of "God Save the Queen"=no rule of law.n/t
bobthedrummer
Oct 2014
#7
The FBI's shameful recruitment of Nazi war criminals (Richard Rashke essay 3-6-13 Reuters)
bobthedrummer
Oct 2014
#47
The Five Eyes program whereby plausible deniability exists for the participating countries
riderinthestorm
Oct 2014
#15
Mass Surveillance in America: A Timeline of Loosening Laws and Practices (Cora Currier, Justin
bobthedrummer
Oct 2014
#23