Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dawg

(10,644 posts)
19. We need something more akin to a parliamentary system.
Tue Nov 4, 2014, 03:50 PM
Nov 2014

For better or worse, the party that controls the House needs to be able to implement their agenda. And they need to do so in a way that leaves no doubt as to who is responsible for the results of that agenda.

Divided government hobbles the country and gives everyone plausible deniability in the eyes of the electorate.

band-aid non-reform reform. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #1
Agree... KansDem Nov 2014 #8
Two years keeps congressional representatives tuned into what their constituents want. badtoworse Nov 2014 #2
I agree- I like 2 year terms Lee-Lee Nov 2014 #3
I agree on that too. Jamastiene Nov 2014 #17
Two years keeps congressional reps in permanent campaign/fundraising mode frazzled Nov 2014 #37
Cancel the private money corrupting our elections. Orsino Nov 2014 #4
The volatility is a good thing. The last thing we need is a system designed for ossification and the Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #5
How about starting with something small? DetlefK Nov 2014 #6
It's never been complicated for me goldent Nov 2014 #40
How about the NYT getting cancelled instead? hobbit709 Nov 2014 #7
Actually, I do agree Proud Public Servant Nov 2014 #9
If you 'cancel the midterms,' the 233 republican majority in the House stays in place until 2018! BP2 Nov 2014 #10
No. Arbitrary or random action in general rock Nov 2014 #11
Amend the Constitution and set the terms of Congress and President to four or six years, whichever. Spider Jerusalem Nov 2014 #12
The Tea Party would absolutely love a parliamentary system. Nye Bevan Nov 2014 #13
Do they? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2014 #14
In any parliamentary system, a small party can threaten to bring down the government, Nye Bevan Nov 2014 #20
Gridlock and very slow change were considered a feature, not a bug, in our system. branford Nov 2014 #28
A small party can threaten, they won't get anywhere Spider Jerusalem Nov 2014 #29
You need to look at places like Italy and Germany as well as the UK. Nye Bevan Nov 2014 #30
What "newly-acquired power"? Spider Jerusalem Nov 2014 #31
A party need not necessarily hold many seats to exert significant influence. branford Nov 2014 #33
The Tories won't be in government Spider Jerusalem Nov 2014 #39
A parliamentary system might be good for the Tea Party, but so what? dawg Nov 2014 #21
Yes, there would be plenty of tawdry back-room deals going on. Nye Bevan Nov 2014 #22
The thing is, the people would get what they voted for. dawg Nov 2014 #24
Interesting perspective, but somewhat skewed. branford Nov 2014 #32
If the President has to resort to repeated vetoes for the last two years of his Presidency, he ... dawg Nov 2014 #35
I think the complaints about divided government are vastly overstated, branford Nov 2014 #38
Well, it's all fun and games and checks and balances until we actually default on something. dawg Nov 2014 #41
Is NYT turning into Salon? LittleBlue Nov 2014 #15
I agree LeftInTX Nov 2014 #18
I'm not sure that it's that "wacky". Two years is a very short term for congressmen. Nye Bevan Nov 2014 #23
That is its intent LittleBlue Nov 2014 #25
Elected representatives should always be worrying about reelection. branford Nov 2014 #34
Two years is long enough. Jamastiene Nov 2014 #16
We need something more akin to a parliamentary system. dawg Nov 2014 #19
Citizen to NYT: SomethingFishy Nov 2014 #26
Are you suggesting changes to the First Amendment? nt branford Nov 2014 #36
I like the 2 yr terms. That way, I have a shot of throwing out the ones I don't like. napi21 Nov 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: "Cancel the Mid...»Reply #19