Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,220 posts)
13. She's saying the things that NEED to be said!
Thu Nov 20, 2014, 12:57 PM
Nov 2014

At Last! AT LONG LAST!!! SOMEBODY in a position of power, authority, and influence, is actually saying those things out loud. In public. On Capitol Hill - and not just a guest speaker, either. Somebody INSIDE. Her presence has made Bernie Sanders' voice louder. Often, I notice (and I try to help contribute to that), their names are referenced together. So it's not really just one, it's TWO. Bernie Sanders was pretty much kicked to the curb all the time because he was basically the only one in the last decade or so (after Paul Wellstone's death) who was trying to articulate OUR positions.

Now SHE is, too. And somehow, she has more marquee value, so her voice carries the message louder. Maybe it's because she's younger, maybe it's because she's female, maybe it's because - I dunno - but things are different since she came onboard in the Senate. Since she ran for the Senate and her message started getting out. She is RAWTHER good at messaging, though. Putting the message A) OUT THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE, and B) putting the message in terms that the middle class can wrap its collective brain around. She gives the message life and vigor and energy. She's breathed life and heart and living, pumping blood into it. She has the common-man touch. And she's articulating the message in ways our stodgy and scatter-brained and frankly chicken-shit reps up til now have been afraid to do. Or maybe they couldn't. Or maybe they thought you have to do it in Senate-speak - which is boring and dull and dead and doesn't reach out and touch the rest of us in the heart and in the gut. You can talk AT somebody. You can speechify AT somebody. AT whole rooms full of people. But you're probably not really connecting. She DOES. And she's warm and human and approachable, and you get the sense that she's really been fighting in the trenches and seeing this close up, and living with it, the way the pampered coast-to-coast Brahmins and other elites and fancy-ass lawyers and heirs and wealthy businesspeople who run successfully for office, who've lived pretty much their whole lives without getting their hands dirty.

Frankly, that's what I always liked about Bill Clinton. Heard him described once as a fatherless boy with an uncertain future back in kindergarten in Arkansas. And that IS what he was, and what he had to start with. And look what happened there. And he's always been able to message well and connect. He's gone all the way to the top and he can STILL connect. He's STILL got the common touch. Something you'll NEVER EVER EVER see with a mitt romney. OR any of the bushes. OR most of the other GOP leadership. ALL of them quite literally born on third base and flatter themselves into thinking they hit a triple. And that goes for young "up-n-comer" george p. bush, too.

The problem is that they do not want ot know. The truth is that when we practice trickle down and jwirr Nov 2014 #1
Yup. Perfect example is my older brother he lost his job of almost 20 years at Bi-Lo cstanleytech Nov 2014 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #16
??? pinto Nov 2014 #18
Thats because it wasnt due to the ACA. cstanleytech Nov 2014 #31
The problem is language. They say trickle down is wildly successfull. And it is for them. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #7
Ah, yes. THEM. the ever-present OTHER who takes what should be for ME and MINE, without earning it. Volaris Nov 2014 #33
What you say is true but is a tangent from what I was saying. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #34
she's so brilliant MissMillie Nov 2014 #2
I'd be proud too. ~nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #3
She's saying the things that NEED to be said! calimary Nov 2014 #13
Run Elizabeth Run .... Please flying-skeleton Nov 2014 #4
Would be nice but I dont picture her running until 2020 at the earliest. nt cstanleytech Nov 2014 #6
As V.P. with Sanders in 2016? maddiemom Nov 2014 #20
I doubt she would run with him as I suspect she probably wants to focus on cstanleytech Nov 2014 #30
Awww, that's so... childish. n/t A Simple Game Nov 2014 #8
Meh, fouled on a technicality. Welcome to DU, flying-skeleton! calimary Nov 2014 #14
Warren / Sanders 2016!!!!! Initech Nov 2014 #23
Supply-side economics doesn't work. Demand is what stimulates the economy. Manifestor_of_Light Nov 2014 #9
it never worked, it never will work noiretextatique Nov 2014 #10
I love her. ReRe Nov 2014 #11
Bush lesson: Tax cuts 4 rich+ bank & mortgage deregulation= DOOM! ErikJ Nov 2014 #12
People who did this did it to make us fail spectacularly. lark Nov 2014 #15
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #17
What is this "nearly" of which you speak ? eppur_se_muova Nov 2014 #19
I just LOVE this woman!!! closeupready Nov 2014 #21
Preach it Liz!!!! Initech Nov 2014 #22
What will you bet that at the next GOP Presidential debate, trickle down tax cuts will be front and aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #24
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #25
Reality of what happens when elections are won by GOP, Reagan pushed his Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #26
So what? POE-PurityOfEssence Nov 2014 #28
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast Nov 2014 #27
She's awesome and speaks the truth...but... IkeRepublican Nov 2014 #29
K&R Segami Nov 2014 #32
GREAT turbinetree Nov 2014 #35
Tell it to Obama and the Third Way "Democrats." blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #36
There was no "Nearly" Senator Warren as it clearly has been a disaster. nt cstanleytech Nov 2014 #37
Exactly the trickly stopped humbled_opinion Nov 2014 #38
30 years of failed conservative economics 4dsc Nov 2014 #39
Substitute "totally", in place of "nearly" SoCalDem Nov 2014 #40
Nearly? woo me with science Nov 2014 #41
And yet EW says she was a Republican because they had better ideas about "the markets..." polichick Nov 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warren Torches GOP On Eco...»Reply #13