Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)

18. See Brandenburg v. Ohio. Link below:

Reply to Oktober (Original post)

Tue Nov 25, 2014, 07:23 PM

Nov 2014

Last edited Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:25 PM - Edit history (1)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Legal beagles... What qualifies as incitement...? a la "Burn this b**** down... [View all] Oktober Nov 2014 OP

By legal definition Chuuku Davis Nov 2014 #1

Too general for prosecution. former9thward Nov 2014 #2

Can you show anyone who heard him did that? n/t dilby Nov 2014 #3

The clip has been on TV. ctaylors6 Nov 2014 #21

What is your point with this? Kalidurga Nov 2014 #4

Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #5

Do you think I didn't understand what legal hurdles you were trying to understand? Kalidurga Nov 2014 #8

So what's the question....? Oktober Nov 2014 #12

I am not the one with the question... Kalidurga Nov 2014 #16

If I were a shop owner who had my livelihood burnt to the foundation... Oktober Nov 2014 #23

Oh well now that I can tell the shop owner Kalidurga Nov 2014 #24

I'm sure that's real comfort to someone who lost the ability to provide for their family... Oktober Nov 2014 #25

Well then get the Better Business Bureau on that to make the police stop terrorizing the citizens.. Kalidurga Nov 2014 #26

Uh huh... Oktober Nov 2014 #27

Nobody said the violence is justified. Kalidurga Nov 2014 #28

clear as mud kydo Nov 2014 #11

Yep Kalidurga Nov 2014 #15

Great point. nt Quixote1818 Nov 2014 #29

Because nobody has listened to Nugent's exhortations and acted upon them mythology Nov 2014 #36

and the other person I spoke of, clive bundy .... kydo Nov 2014 #37

Obvious point is obvious. (n/t) Iggo Nov 2014 #20

So the guy who kills his stepson gets off without even a trial gollygee Nov 2014 #6

Why? You want to arrest a grieving stepfather? BklnDem75 Nov 2014 #7

No azmom Nov 2014 #9

Incitement to precisely what? nt msanthrope Nov 2014 #10

Nope, no more illegal than ignorance and lack of compassion. nt Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #13

Lot of that going around. n/t gollygee Nov 2014 #14

Are you hoping that might happen? n/t Spazito Nov 2014 #17

See Brandenburg v. Ohio. Link below: kelly1mm Nov 2014 #18

I'll tell you two things that actually DID start a riot. Iggo Nov 2014 #19

The anguished cries of a parent (step parent) at hearing their child's murderer .... etherealtruth Nov 2014 #22

I love your sig line. nt kelliekat44 Nov 2014 #31

Thank you! n/t etherealtruth Nov 2014 #34

Well, since shooting an unarmed teen isn't considered murder I guess 'incitement' isn't what you The Straight Story Nov 2014 #30

You know that words have meaning right? Oktober Nov 2014 #32

Oktober... What qualifies as involuntary manslaughter...? a la "he looked like a demon"... Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #33

My guess is the basis for the initial interaction plays a large role... Oktober Nov 2014 #35