That might work (Reply #7) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: Pressure Nixon to Appoint a Special Prosectuter. [View all]

Response to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #6)

Thu Nov 27, 2014, 08:32 PM

RobertEarl (13,685 posts)

7. That might work

It is quite obvious that the prosecutor in this case wanted to see NO indictment.

If he had wanted an indictment by the grand jury, there would heave been an indictment.

It is the job of a prosecutor to prosecute. That was NOT done in this case. What happened here was a defense of the police officer.

So what we have here is a subversion of the judicial system and no fair trial for the accused.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

8 replies	Author	Time	Post
Pressure Nixon to Appoint a Special Prosectuter. [View all]	dballance	Nov 2014	OP
It's like all of a sudden I was transported back to Watergate when I read this. . . n/t	Stargleamer	Nov 2014	#1
Jesus, yes...I just had a flashback...	First Speaker	Nov 2014	#8
Someone posted earlier that he couldn't do it unilaterally	BumRushDaShow	Nov 2014	#2
Would that bring the AG into it?	loyalsister	Nov 2014	#3
Primary the asshat	Kalidurga	Nov 2014	#4
If you're referring to Nixon	mythology	Nov 2014	#5
If I were in Ferguson, I'd be demonstrating in front of McCulloch's house 24/7	aint_no_life_nowhere	Nov 2014	#6
That might work	RobertEarl	Nov 2014	#7

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.