General Discussion

lark

(23,058 posts)

78. You say there are a lot of mistakes, but only mention one.

Tue Dec 9, 2014, 02:30 PM

Dec 2014

Oh great guru of political board English, what were the other legion of mistakes? At my age, I'm lucky I can still see well enough to even use the Internet.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

91 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Ed Show Just Handed Obamas A$$ back to him on TPP [View all] rsmith6621 Dec 2014 OP

Hillary helped write the TPP. She cannot back away from it. djean111 Dec 2014 #1

What does this Party STAND FOR, anymore??? Seems all our "leadership" are 1980's Republicans. blkmusclmachine Dec 2014 #2

I stand with Democrats not the fredamae Dec 2014 #4

Did you get your capitalization crossed? Jack Rabbit Dec 2014 #22

I also wonder that, what is the Dem. Plan? and Vision? Seems we're clearly not involved or as I saw appalachiablue Dec 2014 #7

As the late, great George Carlin said. hifiguy Dec 2014 #12

Carlin got it for real. Thanks. appalachiablue Dec 2014 #19

+1000 C Moon Dec 2014 #24

Sums it up BrotherIvan Dec 2014 #35

Thanks Thespian2 Dec 2014 #53

I support Obama but not on this and George was right, dammit NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #76

"These leaders" do not care about you and me. pangaia Dec 2014 #30

Stand up to the PTB? His job is to be their spokesperson. truedelphi Dec 2014 #58

Exactly.. sendero Dec 2014 #91

Global capital, a succinct phrase. -nt CrispyQ Dec 2014 #71

At the top, they stand for enriching themselves hifiguy Dec 2014 #9

Not seems. Is. n/t. LeftOfWest Dec 2014 #62

In this day of politics as a team sport (PATS-I'm going to start using that) they don't need cui bono Dec 2014 #80

I'm calling fredamae Dec 2014 #3

After watching Ed in Wisconsin supporting the teachers I have always understood that if I needed jwirr Dec 2014 #18

I just saw this TPP piece by Ed Schultz with VT Peter Defazio, Mark Pochan, Leo Gerard Steelworkers. appalachiablue Dec 2014 #5

There are some Democrats that believe trade is good for the American workers... kentuck Dec 2014 #6

They may call themselves Democrats, but they are only Democrats on social issues lark Dec 2014 #10

I wish I could kick your post 1000 times. hifiguy Dec 2014 #14

They may say they are for social issues... ReRe Dec 2014 #15

They could give a shit about social issues as well. obxhead Dec 2014 #25

Sadly, both parties are like that. lark Dec 2014 #79

BING-GO!! Populist_Prole Dec 2014 #37

worker do badLY AlbertCat Dec 2014 #54

You say there are a lot of mistakes, but only mention one. lark Dec 2014 #78

Yours was a minor common mistake....I make all the time too AlbertCat Dec 2014 #88

+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #67

Exactly. And that's why the apologists listing PBO's social progress are missing the big picture. cui bono Dec 2014 #81

Blammo. hifiguy Dec 2014 #87

FDR must have been one of them. He and Truman were the ones that designed the post-war trading pampango Dec 2014 #29

FDR favored multinaitonal trade agreements provided they would not lower the standard of JDPriestly Dec 2014 #46

Your quote is from FDR in 1933. His commitment to multilateral trade agreements evolved later. pampango Dec 2014 #47

They are out of touch with humanity. pangaia Dec 2014 #31

We've already entered the post-human era I think. A dilemma as I'm big on humans. appalachiablue Dec 2014 #60

Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #73

And what if the sky was made of blueberry pudding and whipped cream? cui bono Dec 2014 #82

Well, that IS the U.S. Government's negotiation position ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #83

Well isn't that nice. We were also told we were going to get a public option before the actual cui bono Dec 2014 #84

Yes, that is "nice" ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #85

Obama has never fought for labor, neither has Hillary. And it has been decades since liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #8

Hillary and Obama are close to being 2 sides of the same coin lark Dec 2014 #11

Don't forget Bill hifiguy Dec 2014 #13

"NAFTA on steroids"? How can you argue with that level of analysis? Good going, TV host Ed! Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #16

Even TPP's critics know that it has little to do with reducing tariffs like NAFTA did. pampango Dec 2014 #33

Does anyone know... ReRe Dec 2014 #17

No surprise on Hillary PatrynXX Dec 2014 #20

The XL pipeline is 35 permanent jobs. TBF Dec 2014 #21

Yes but the AFL-CIO INdemo Dec 2014 #44

And the AFL-CIO is making a mistake TBF Dec 2014 #45

We know the AFL-CIO is not always right. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #68

Where are all the blue links to tell us how great TPP is? bread_and_roses Dec 2014 #23

Good. Obama needs a good talking to about the TPP. Jack Rabbit Dec 2014 #26

TPP will allow corporations to become self aware. And that's not good for anybody. Initech Dec 2014 #27

This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Dec 2014 #28

Understand this: 99Forever Dec 2014 #32

Are "Washington DC Democrats" those ""rich out-of-touch east coast open-borders globalist liberals" pampango Dec 2014 #36

Bait somebody else... 99Forever Dec 2014 #38

K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2014 #34

Progressives stand up for People! Thank you Ed, & our OP!! RiverLover Dec 2014 #39

k and r. I love me some ass kickin ED. I wonder how bbgrunt Dec 2014 #40

Remember the Majory Sockholder of NBC is INdemo Dec 2014 #55

He will become more wealthy helpmetohelpyou Dec 2014 #41

Ed should invite Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren as regular guests at least on his radio show JDPriestly Dec 2014 #42

let's harness the rage DemandsRedPill Dec 2014 #43

Recommended. madfloridian Dec 2014 #48

The Ed Show Video INdemo Dec 2014 #49

We'll just lose more jobs and gain more trade debt Elmer S. E. Dump Dec 2014 #50

Obama's AlbertCat Dec 2014 #51

Ed has no idea what he is talking about, TPP is not Nafta. CK_John Dec 2014 #52

Please explain why you think that the TPP is not NAFTA. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #63

Krugman thinks the TPP is "no big deal". I doubt that you or many others think the same of NAFTA. pampango Dec 2014 #65

You are really really going to a lot of effort to defend the TPP. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #69

If "no big deal" is a defense, so be it. And it is really not that much effort. pampango Dec 2014 #72

Krugman was also a big supporter of NAFTA. bvar22 Dec 2014 #86

About 5 1/2 billion buyers. CK_John Dec 2014 #74

This is a reflection of a bad wzw90334 Dec 2014 #56

Don't forget, Ed raged about why the Keystone Pipeline was IMPORTANT to America.... George II Dec 2014 #57

He didn't change his tune when it suited him. He changed his tune when he was clued in on truth. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #70

Go, Big ED! yortsed snacilbuper Dec 2014 #59

Of course Hillary helped write it Samantha Dec 2014 #61

the video of the president's "statements" seemed forced hopemountain Dec 2014 #64

Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast Dec 2014 #66

There are some on this site that have been saying this Phlem Dec 2014 #75

Every investor in Wall St is demanding it happens. raouldukelives Dec 2014 #77

kick woo me with science Dec 2014 #89

kick woo me with science Dec 2014 #90