Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Greenwald's agenda and the truth are two distinct things. eom MohRokTah Jan 2015 #1
I just took a look at French media....AQAP might be behind the shooting..Awlaki's old crew... msanthrope Jan 2015 #4
Good stuff...kick Blue_Tires Jan 2015 #2
oh sure nt grasswire Jan 2015 #28
Par for the course for that guy. zappaman Jan 2015 #3
You know, I was criticized for calling out Greenwald's representation of Nazis in civil msanthrope Jan 2015 #8
"what political agenda allows for this?" No real agenda. uhnope Jan 2015 #44
BOOM! There it is! Behind the Aegis Jan 2015 #174
my god, there's something really wrong with Greenwald uhnope Jan 2015 #175
K & R. n/t FSogol Jan 2015 #5
It's like Greenwald is half asleep when he composes his stuff. randome Jan 2015 #6
He's not half-asleep---he counts on his readership to be. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #9
No opportunity too tasteless to thrash Greenwald eh? whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #7
Indeed....how horrible of me not to take GG's reputation into account before correctly msanthrope Jan 2015 #10
Well if ibtimes says so... whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #11
Did they take over the The Wire, too...my source in the OP which reported the hit list in 2013? msanthrope Jan 2015 #13
I'm suggesting your interest in the truth whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #15
I will happily debate the truth with you....is there a single fact I've presented you take issue msanthrope Jan 2015 #19
My critique whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #22
Indeed....I'm still waiting for your critique. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #46
I thought it was about "truth". cheapdate Jan 2015 #152
what exactly do you contend is untrue in anything she has written here? bettyellen Jan 2015 #20
It's the frenzied interpretive dance with facts I take issue with. n/t whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #23
+1 bahrbearian Jan 2015 #40
Are you sure? Or do you take issue with my description of the 9/11 hijackers? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #64
What is your description? whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #65
In my OP. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #67
I see what you called al-Awlaki whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #70
Do you believe they exist? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #73
Of course whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #74
Just wondering. You seem to have previously described them as "woo." msanthrope Jan 2015 #77
Haha I get what you're trying to do whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #82
Ah....so what fact of mine do you dispute? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #83
To start with whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #87
First, I never contented that we know all we need to know. I think that every single bit of msanthrope Jan 2015 #88
Again, it's an opinion, not a fact whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #89
It absolutely is a fact. As a non-custodial member of AQAP, actively engaged in terror, he was msanthrope Jan 2015 #91
This is an old Atlantic article that I'll leave for DUers whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #96
Hey--when GG decided to blame Canada for its terrorist shooting a few months ago, did you msanthrope Jan 2015 #99
It also rightly questions the bad laws and opinions whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #101
Yeah...I'm really good with how the likes of Bin Laden left the earth. How about you? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #105
I'm not good with it at all whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #106
Yeah.....just not seeing the downside to Bin Laden's death. Do tell. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #107
He doesn't get to tell his side of the story in a court of law. Octafish Jan 2015 #159
So President Obama hushed up Bin Laden to save the Bushes??? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #160
No, that's what you wrote. Octafish Jan 2015 #161
LOL! zappaman Jan 2015 #164
What do you know! Octafish Jan 2015 #165
Right? zappaman Jan 2015 #166
I thought Democrats cared about Civil Rights, even those with whom they disagree? Octafish Jan 2015 #167
"With whom they disagree"? zappaman Jan 2015 #168
Is your ignorance intentional, zappaman? Octafish Jan 2015 #169
When it comes to "intentional ignorance", I certainly bow to your expertise. zappaman Jan 2015 #170
To quote me requires you write ''ignorance intentional,'' zappaman. Octafish Jan 2015 #172
Lol! zappaman Jan 2015 #173
It indicates what you know about journalism and research, zappaman. Octafish Jan 2015 #178
I know not to defend anti-Semites.... zappaman Jan 2015 #179
Rather defend extrajudicial killing? nt elias49 Jan 2015 #182
LOL, so you can't defend your accusation. Noted. bettyellen Jan 2015 #69
oh please. Anyone reading your posts can see you are projecting uhnope Jan 2015 #47
That's about as shameless an attempt to derail a thread I've ever seen Number23 Jan 2015 #68
interesting. NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #180
If you took Greenwald's reputation into accout, your post would have been more scathing. George II Jan 2015 #43
I would think so too. The only one damaging arthritisR_US Jan 2015 #58
Well, any excuse to exploit the dead, I suppose Scootaloo Jan 2015 #108
When GG blamed Canada for its terror attack that killed a reservist, did you tell him that? msanthrope Jan 2015 #109
I'm talking about you, msanthrope, and your exploitation of murder Scootaloo Jan 2015 #110
Oh right--weren't you on that thread, defending Mr. Greenwald? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #115
I was pointing out the idiocy of several posters and their selective reading ability Scootaloo Jan 2015 #123
Which posters were idiots? You seem to have a hypocritical stance--GG can talk about msanthrope Jan 2015 #126
^^^ grasswire Jan 2015 #27
These OPs are useful to me, in that I can watch who "K&R's" them Maedhros Jan 2015 #45
I've never recommended a thread before. OilemFirchen Jan 2015 #55
Interesting - I too have NEVER done so but just did... George II Jan 2015 #71
Why you believe your ignore list Jeff Rosenzweig Jan 2015 #56
I'll save you a bit of time. I just Rec'd the OP, so please ... 11 Bravo Jan 2015 #72
And those supporting murder apologist Glenn Greenwald? Ikonoklast Jan 2015 #80
I'm crushed! greatauntoftriplets Jan 2015 #84
Let me help you. K&R Andy823 Jan 2015 #94
Goody. Am I on your ignore list? I have no time for people who fail to use citations and research. Hekate Jan 2015 #112
I stand with msanthrope and the facts. great white snark Jan 2015 #113
Thank you. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #146
Put me on ignore leftynyc Jan 2015 #177
Thank you for the research, msanthrope. That used to count for something here. Hekate Jan 2015 #12
i've been talking about Molly Norris on this site for a few years now....anytime someone posts msanthrope Jan 2015 #17
Well done! I could not agree more with your points... Spazito Jan 2015 #14
K&R! Good research. Greenwald occasionally says something sensible. MineralMan Jan 2015 #18
I might quibble with you as to Greenwald saying something sensible... Spazito Jan 2015 #24
I did mean it for the OP, yes. My error. MineralMan Jan 2015 #30
Thanks, leaving it does allow more continuity n/t Spazito Jan 2015 #34
The GG'S reminds me of the Libertarian ilk... arthritisR_US Jan 2015 #60
Yep, his Libertarian roots run deep... Spazito Jan 2015 #62
That's the impression he has always left me with. arthritisR_US Jan 2015 #78
I remember when Rand Paul was challenged on his comments re the Civil Rights Act... Spazito Jan 2015 #81
Peas in a pod, if you ask me. nt arthritisR_US Jan 2015 #85
If you did a Venn of the two types you are describing, one circle red, one blue, it would be msanthrope Jan 2015 #26
Yes. I think you're correct. MineralMan Jan 2015 #32
I truly wonder why someone who has accused the President of killing a terrorist for their msanthrope Jan 2015 #21
I wonder why DUers continue to consider his screeds acceptable even lauditory... Spazito Jan 2015 #25
Greenwald is very like Newt Gingrich---he sounds like what a smart person is supposed msanthrope Jan 2015 #29
Greenwald's thin skin when it comes to criticism mirrors Limbaugh's as well... Spazito Jan 2015 #31
He is very thin-skinned. You can tell from both the vitriol, and the screeds he produces in defense msanthrope Jan 2015 #35
I have often thought the same... Spazito Jan 2015 #38
Yes. I remember the time I referred to him as a libertarian and a MineralMan Jan 2015 #48
He's gotta get a thesaurus, or some new material. He beat that term to death in one of his books msanthrope Jan 2015 #57
Greenwald is an unstable narcissist uhnope Jan 2015 #49
Greenwald is very much like Newt Gingrich. Each asjr Jan 2015 #41
This is one of the best posts I've read at DU in a long, long time... SidDithers Jan 2015 #16
Post removed Post removed Jan 2015 #33
+ a googol whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #37
Apparently not everyone agrees with your praise. MineralMan Jan 2015 #50
And on a day when DU is in an uproar over freedom of expression whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #53
Maedhros is so full of freedom of expression s/he made a big deal about who KittyWampus Jan 2015 #98
LOL, good point! Spazito Jan 2015 #111
You mean that Rajib Karim was unlawfully convicted? The emails between him and Awlaki, presented in msanthrope Jan 2015 #42
That poster won't be able to reply to you. MineralMan Jan 2015 #52
That is a wonderful portmanteau of "chide" and "hidden." I am going to use it. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #59
I've used that for years. I think of MineralMan Jan 2015 #117
Great post, thanks. Greenwald is a self serving, duplicitous piece of garbage George II Jan 2015 #36
K & R SunSeeker Jan 2015 #39
KR uhnope Jan 2015 #51
So you support summarily executing American citizens with no due process? alarimer Jan 2015 #54
I contend that Mr. Awlaki had plenty of due process, and would be more than happy to debate that msanthrope Jan 2015 #61
"You make me sick".. Oooops, your words just boomeranged! Cha Jan 2015 #75
there is a lot of dishonesty when these things are brought up JI7 Jan 2015 #63
UNREC CrawlingChaos Jan 2015 #66
indeed, when the first thought in the aftermath of such a tragedy stupidicus Jan 2015 #76
What makes you think Greenwald isn't here? MM upthread described GG linking to one of his posts. msanthrope Jan 2015 #79
plenty stupidicus Jan 2015 #90
So when GG used the tragedy of shootings in Canada to say they had it coming..... msanthrope Jan 2015 #92
Geez, I totally missed that thread... Spazito Jan 2015 #95
Note the hypocrisy....Glenn can blame terrorism on the victims, but I'm the bad person msanthrope Jan 2015 #97
Yep, hypocrisy abounds, imo, among those who would defend the indefensible... Spazito Jan 2015 #102
that's meaningless garbage stupidicus Jan 2015 #103
Wait- we can't critique Greenwald unless he's here to defend himself? Does that logic apply KittyWampus Jan 2015 #100
Kitty..I have no doubt GG is here....google "Greenwald" and "sock puppet" and you will read the most msanthrope Jan 2015 #104
Yes but according to the "logic" of previous poster we can't critique anyone unless they are here. KittyWampus Jan 2015 #128
Note that not a single one of them has provided a dispute of facts? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #130
I noticed that! Spazito Jan 2015 #138
Oh, that has been WELL noted. As well as the attacks on Cali_Dem for daring to post Greenwald's Number23 Jan 2015 #141
You know, for a long time, blue links were eschewed. I think when you are dealing with GG..... msanthrope Jan 2015 #143
good grief stupidicus Jan 2015 #149
What an interesting, thought provoking treestar Jan 2015 #137
Thank you for once again exposing the ODS of GG that is so entrenched it makes him Cha Jan 2015 #86
Thank you, friend. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #93
Tying this to Greenwald is unseemly LittleBlue Jan 2015 #114
Mr. Greenwald had no problem blaming victims of terror...... msanthrope Jan 2015 #116
Yes, Greenwald made you do it whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #118
Hey--upthread you are avoiding my Bin Laden question. Tell us why you regret his death. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #120
You know why whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #122
How in the heck did Bin Laden's death destroy the Constitution? nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #127
You're right whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #129
I think John Yoo is an evil motherfucker. So was Bin Laden. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #131
This message was self-deleted by its author whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #132
So when I wrote this.... msanthrope Jan 2015 #133
I was self deleting at the moment you were posting whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #134
You could have posted this last week or next week LittleBlue Jan 2015 #124
yep, that's all crystal clear stupidicus Jan 2015 #150
Seconded. Marr Jan 2015 #171
Wow, excellent OP, msanthrope. Bobbie Jo Jan 2015 #119
The idea that any POTUS of America would have someone murdered over expressing their opinion Rex Jan 2015 #121
Well--it's part of the persecution schtick that helps Greenwald get clicks. That...and his general msanthrope Jan 2015 #125
Killing a U.S. citizen for exercising free speech is good anger management, is it? MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #135
Wait a second---"finding out what the facts are behind any of these fatwas?" msanthrope Jan 2015 #136
Awlaki himself decided not to use the US legal system treestar Jan 2015 #139
You forgot... MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #140
"finding out what the facts are behind any of these fatwas"---could you please explain msanthrope Jan 2015 #142
Still waiting for you to answer me. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #155
Yeah, let's not rush to judge these fatwas, LOL! bettyellen Jan 2015 #145
Thank you---I'm still trying to get an answer over this! Maybe the poster can clarify what the msanthrope Jan 2015 #147
Still waiting for you to answer me. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #148
Try to be truthful... MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #157
Again, your stance on fatwas seems unclear. Are you saying that Awlaki did not issue a death threat msanthrope Jan 2015 #158
"In short, he had due process….." MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #162
Yes..he had due process, and will happily debate you on that point. But again, please clarify msanthrope Jan 2015 #163
KICK! Cha Jan 2015 #144
kick , this backs up a lot of the stuff coming out today JI7 Jan 2015 #151
This is more relevant than ever now.. Cha Jan 2015 #153
Thank you......OMG......Awlaki financed them? And I want to direct you here--- msanthrope Jan 2015 #154
Kick and rec. zappaman Jan 2015 #156
Excellent Op msanthrope. sheshe2 Jan 2015 #176
Kick...for relevancy...nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #181
Kick--because Awlaki is being whitewashed.....nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #183
k uhnope Jan 2015 #184
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Molly Norris, American Ca...»Reply #56