General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We Need More War - BFEE Business Plan is now the modern American Economic Worldview. [View all]JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I swear I didn't enter Ukraine into the search box. I tried to search supply nuclear arms Iraq and come across a well sourced article asking is United States trying to start a nuclear war with Russia.
A link of that led to me a link of this.
The U.S. News Media Show How to Do Propaganda About Ukraines Civil War
The New York Review of Books is a leading intellectual publication in the United States, and it (like all of the major U.S. news media) has reported on the Ukrainian civil war as having been incited by Russias Vladimir Putin a simple-minded explanation, which also happens to be deeply false. The reality is that the residents of southern Ukraine, the part of Ukraine adjoining Russia, were overwhelmingly opposed to the overthrow of Ukraines democratically elected President, Viktor Yanukovych, though they are portrayed in NYRB (and other news media) as being mere stooges of Russian propaganda for their opposing the coup that overthrew the President for whom they had voted overwhelmingly. (The only thing that Americas news media had previously reported about Yanukovych is that he was corrupt; but so were all of his predecessors, and U.S. media ignored this crucial fact. Selective reporting is basic to propaganda, and the U.S. major media are trained masters at it. Without a persons knowing that Ukraine is by far the most corrupt country in the former Soviet Union, and the one with the worst economic performance of them all, Ukraines politics just cant be understood at all: it has long been an extreme kleptocracy, ruled by psychopathic politicians, for the benefit of psychopathic oligarchs, who have robbed the country blind. Thats the deeper truth and its key to understanding the current situation there.)
So: by digging into an example, the rot in U.S. news media will be dissected here, and the truth in Ukraine will be exposed here.
On 28 April 2014, NYRBs reporter Tim Judah headlined from Donetsk in the south, Ukraine: Hate in Progress. He (falsely) analogized the opponents against that coup as being similar to the separatists in Yugoslavia whose ethnocentrism had produced the atrocities during the civil war that broke up Yugoslavia. Judah wrote:
Talk to people manning the anti-government barricades and taking part in the demonstrations against Kiev [in the north] here,
and one thing in particular is scary. After a day or two you realize that they all say more or less the same thing. We want to be listened to, people say. The government in Kiev, which took power after the pro-European revolution there, is a fascist junta backed by Europe and the US. It is as though the Russian mediawhich is widely watched and read herehas somehow embedded these messages into the heads of people and they have lost the ability to think for themselves.
All that seems to be registering right now is a nationalist and hysterical drumbeat from Russia about the new Nazis of Kiev and their NATO masters. [Judahs article provides no evidence against that Nazis of Kiev viewpont; he simply ignores it, as if its not even worth checking out and hes supposed to be a reporter. Instead, he goes immediately into his mere assumption that the rejectionists of the coup are the source of his alleged Hate in Progress.] This is ominously reminiscent of what the Serbian media and other bits of the former Yugoslav media did when Yugoslavia collapsed. Then, Serbs were subjected to endless documentaries about Croatias wartime fascists, whom they were told were coming back. Now the Russian media says the fascists have returned.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/05/u-s-news-media-show-propaganda-ukraines-civil-war.html
The "most corrupt former" government links to http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf
I also have reported on Why Ukraines Civil War Is of Global Historical Importance. The article argued that This civil war is of massive historical importance, because it re-starts the global Cold War, this time no longer under the fig-leaf rationalization of an ideological battle between capitalism versus communism, but instead more raw, as a struggle between, on the one hand, the U.S. and West European aristocracies; and, on the other hand, the newly emerging aristocracies of Russia and of China. The conflicts origin, as recounted there, was told in its highest detail in an article in the scholarly journal Diplomatic History, about how U.S. President George H.W. Bush in 1990 fooled the Soviet Unions leader Mikhail Gorbachev into Gorbachevs allowing the Cold War to be ended without any assurance being given to the remaining rump country, his own Russia, that NATO and its missiles and bombers wont expand right up to Russias doorstep and surround Russia with a first-strike ability to destroy Russia before Russia will even have a chance to get its own nuclear weapons into the air in order to destroy the U.S. right back in retaliation.
That old system Mutually Assured Destruction or MAD, but actually very rational from the publics perspective on both sides is gone. The U.S. increasingly is getting nuclear primacy. Russia, surrounded by NATO nations and U.S. nuclear weapons, would be able to be wiped out before its rusty and comparatively puny military force could be mustered to respond. Whereas we are not surrounded by their weapons, they are surrounded by ours. Whereas they dont have the ability to wipe us out before we can respond, we have the ability to wipe them out before theyll be able to respond. This is the reason why Americas aristocracy argue that MAD is dead. An article, Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War was published in the December 2008 Physics Today, and it concluded that, the indirect effects [nuclear winter] would likely eliminate the majority of the human population. (It would be even worse, and far faster, than the expected harms from global warming.) However, aristocrats separate themselves from the public, and so their perspective is not necessarily the same as the publics. The perspective that J.P. Morgan and Co. had in 1915 wasnt the perspective that the U.S. public had back then, and it also wasnt the perspective that our President, Woodrow Wilson, did back then, when we were a democracy. But its even less clear today that we are a democracy than it was in 1915. In that regard, things have only gotten worse in America.
So, President Obama is now trying to persuade EU leaders to join with him to complete this plan to replace MAD with a first-strike nuclear capability that will eliminate Russia altogether from the world stage.
As I also documented, the IMF is thoroughly supportive of this plan to remove Russia, and announced on May 1st, just a day prior to our massacre of independence-supporters in the south Ukrainian city of Odessa on May 2nd, that unless all of the independence supporters in south and eastern Ukraine can be defeated and/or killed, the IMF will pull the plug on Ukraine and force it into receivership.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/06/indications-u-s-planning-nuclear-attack-russia.html
Not One Inch Eastward? Bush, Baker, Kohl,Genscher, Gorbachev, and the Origin of RussianResentment toward NATO Enlargement
http://www.scribd.com/doc/166123009/Not-One-Inch-Eastward#download (PDF)
The Key Man Behind the May 2nd Odessa Ukraine Trade Unions Building Massacre: His Many Connections to the White House
The key person behind the May 2nd massacre inside Odessas Trade Unions Building appears to have been Ihor Kolomoyskyi
who was appointed to be the regional governor in that area by Yulia Tymoshenko, the Ukrainian Presidential candidate that the Obama Administration has apparently been hoping will win the May 25th election to take over the Ukrainian Government, from the junta that the Obama Administration imposed in Ukraine on February 22nd. Just weeks before this coup, on February 4th, the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and Asia, Victoria Nuland, chose Tymoshenkos ally Arseni Yatsenyuk to head the post-coup interim government, which appointed Kolomoyskyi.
Only a few months before this coup, Nuland had asserted that U.S. taxpayers had already invested more than $5 billion, in order to bring democracy to Ukraine, by which she was referring to the U.S. effort to oust the Russian-oriented, democratically elected, leader of Ukraine, President Viktor Yanukovych, who had prosecuted and imprisoned Tymoshenko for embezzlement and abuse of governmental office. Tymoshenko was then on 11 October 2011 sentenced to seven years in prison, and was ordered to pay the government restitution of $188 million. She was released from prison less than three years later, two days after the coup, on 24 February 2014. The Ukrainian criminal code was immediately changed, in order to legalize the actions for which Tymoshenko had been imprisoned. This allowed Tymoshenko to run for the Ukrainian Presidency. She had been Prime Minister 2007-2010. Both she and her husband, Oleksandr Tymoshenko, and his father, all three of whom were on the board of United Energy Systems of Ukraine (and thus Ms. Tymoshenko was called the gas princess), have been legally prosecuted as embezzling state funds; but so have most of Ukraines oligarchs and political leaders (and theres a lot of crossover between those two categories).
Kolomoyskyi, who lives in Geneva Switzerland, is generally regarded as the second-richest man in Ukraine, with a fortune estimated at about $6 billion. Tymoshenko used to be called the Eleven Billion Dollar Woman, but, like all of Ukraines oligarchs (including Kolomoyskyi), nobody really knows precisely how wealthy she is, nor even whether she is more, or perhaps less, wealthy than Kolomoyskyi. Almost all of the oligarchs money is hidden offshore; so, is invisible.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/05/key-man-behind-may-2nd-odessa-ukraine-trade-unions-building-massacre-many-connections-white-house.html
I don't know about Nuclear but you may be more right about World War III than you think, if that is possible.