Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Four hundred and twenty eight dollars per person [View all]OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)2. "This nation can afford to spend what is needed..."
Quadrennial Defense Review Report
September 30, 2001
This Quadrennial Defense Review was the product of the senior civilian
and military leadership of the Department of Defense. It benefited from
extensive consultation with the President of the United States. It was truly
"top down" in that the decisions taken on strategy, forces, capabilities, and
risks resulted from months of deliberations and consultation among the
most senior Defense Department leadership. This report outlines the key
changes needed to preserve America's safety and security in the years
to come.
The Quadrennial Defense Review and the accompanying report were
largely completed before the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on the
United States. In important ways, these attacks confirm the strategic
direction and planning principles that resulted from this review,
particularly its emphasis on homeland defense, on surprise, on preparing
for asymmetric threats, on the need to develop new concepts of
deterrence, on the need for a capabilities-based strategy, and on the need
to balance deliberately the different dimensions of risk. However, the
attack on the United States on September 11, 2001 will require us to move
forward more rapidly in these directions, even while we are engaged in
the war against terrorism.
The vast array of complex policy, operational, and even constitutional
issues concerning how we organize and prepare to defend the American
people are now receiving unprecedented attention throughout the
United States government. Importantly, since the scope of homeland
security responsibilities span an array of federal, state, and local
organizations, it also will require enhanced inter-agency processes and
capabilities to effectively defend the United States against attacks. The
recent establishment of the Office of Homeland Security will galvanize
this vital effort.
Finally, the loss of life and damage to our economy from the attack of
September 11, 2001 should give us a new perspective on the question of
what this country can afford for its defense. It would be reckless to press
our luck with false economies or gamble with our children's future. This
nation can afford to spend what is needed to deter the adversaries of
tomorrow and to underpin our prosperity. Those costs do not begin to
compare with the cost in human lives and resources if we fail to do so.
September 30, 2001
This Quadrennial Defense Review was the product of the senior civilian
and military leadership of the Department of Defense. It benefited from
extensive consultation with the President of the United States. It was truly
"top down" in that the decisions taken on strategy, forces, capabilities, and
risks resulted from months of deliberations and consultation among the
most senior Defense Department leadership. This report outlines the key
changes needed to preserve America's safety and security in the years
to come.
The Quadrennial Defense Review and the accompanying report were
largely completed before the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on the
United States. In important ways, these attacks confirm the strategic
direction and planning principles that resulted from this review,
particularly its emphasis on homeland defense, on surprise, on preparing
for asymmetric threats, on the need to develop new concepts of
deterrence, on the need for a capabilities-based strategy, and on the need
to balance deliberately the different dimensions of risk. However, the
attack on the United States on September 11, 2001 will require us to move
forward more rapidly in these directions, even while we are engaged in
the war against terrorism.
The vast array of complex policy, operational, and even constitutional
issues concerning how we organize and prepare to defend the American
people are now receiving unprecedented attention throughout the
United States government. Importantly, since the scope of homeland
security responsibilities span an array of federal, state, and local
organizations, it also will require enhanced inter-agency processes and
capabilities to effectively defend the United States against attacks. The
recent establishment of the Office of Homeland Security will galvanize
this vital effort.
Finally, the loss of life and damage to our economy from the attack of
September 11, 2001 should give us a new perspective on the question of
what this country can afford for its defense. It would be reckless to press
our luck with false economies or gamble with our children's future. This
nation can afford to spend what is needed to deter the adversaries of
tomorrow and to underpin our prosperity. Those costs do not begin to
compare with the cost in human lives and resources if we fail to do so.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Like most such cost estimates, its a mixture of direct and indirect, present and future costs
onenote
Feb 2015
#13
But Rumsfeld and Cheney promised that the war would pay for itself in 6 months.
world wide wally
Feb 2015
#15
It was all about photo ops for that guy, wasn't it. Of course, the pretzel scar was a bad one.
C Moon
Feb 2015
#19
That's almost $10,000 for every person...adult and child...counted in the US 2010 census
stuffmatters
Feb 2015
#20