Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OOOPS! Hillary's foundation received 81 million through Swiss Bank Acct under Investigation [View all]JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)5. Ready For Jeb!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OOOPS! Hillary's foundation received 81 million through Swiss Bank Acct under Investigation [View all]
Ramses
Feb 2015
OP
+1 Bernie is the only current potential candidate telling the truth about oligarchy.
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#32
Paging Elizabeth . . . please pick up the red courtesy phone . . . President Obama on his hotline is calling.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2015
#28
Nope. Warren "hopes she runs", said "she's terrific", and "terrific"= intense, causing terror.
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
#147
Can't believe so many here in denial bout Hillary. Where there's smoke, there's fire; where there's fire, there's a ragin inferno.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2015
#29
All you and your ilk's attempts to discredit her have the efficacy...
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2015
#79
We don't have to discredit her - she's done an excellent job of it all by herself. [n/t]
Maedhros
Feb 2015
#152
Even if she did which I dispute you and your ilk saying it is so has the efficacy of farting in the
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2015
#154
There is only one question that we need ot ask. Does the Clinton Foundation actually use the money
jwirr
Feb 2015
#76
Another post trying to suggest mental health problems in the person you are arguing with.
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#34
ready for hillary -- and bill -- to go back to arkansas. maybe buy a little house, play with
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#14
I thought they were married. And Hillary was first lady of Arkansas. You think they should
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#149
I Agree 100%, it's only an appearance of a conflict but it sure looks suspicious-Hillary needs 2 clear this up pronto 2 have any chance at the nomination.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2015
#30
Vanilla, I would think as an ardent Hillary supporter, which I respect, you would agree that Hillary should address & clear up what you admit is an apparent conflict of interest...
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2015
#133
The Foundation should stop taking these donations IF and WHEN Hillary announces she's running. n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#26
No question, but may be too little, too late. I would also recommend that Bill discontinue all flights to orgy island.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2015
#31
This is the time to winnow the field of Democratic candidates. Don't allow the Hillary worshippers
Scuba
Feb 2015
#42
I'm referring to those who post long lists of Hillary's "leftist" positions on minor issues.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#58
Yes, compared to being pro war and turning our sovereignity over to corporations, those are minor.
Scuba
Feb 2015
#64
So the ONLY issue for you....is war...and by the way...if you bothered to read
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#66
I didn't see your post before I posted mine down thread but yep, it's pathetic
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#120
I was told in another thread that a groundswell was both irrelevant and unachievable.
Maedhros
Feb 2015
#153
Your standard response, which has been repeatedly exposed as the empty PR it is.
woo me with science
Feb 2015
#77
My standard response is the facts.. the record...straight from the source herself....
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#83
and then draw a beaker and some nerdy glasses....you know to signify the sciency part!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#93
Woo has his or her point of view and I would defend to my death his or her right to express it.
DemocratSinceBirth
Feb 2015
#104
Just another anti-Hillary thread from the right wing. Move along folks, nothing to see.
leftofcool
Feb 2015
#70
Let me get this straight, at worst, a charity to whom Hillary lends her name had
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#118
The dialogue would not be different. Nonsense is nonsense and this is nonsense. Nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#137
No, it wouldn't, because we don't need to make garbage up. That's not our schtick
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#138