Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Few Modest Suggestions for Making DU's Presidential OPs More Friendly to Women [View all]cui bono
(19,926 posts)24. But there are many people who aren't really racist or sexist but say things that are offensive
without being aware of it. Don't you want yourself and them enlightened when that happens? Would you want to be saying something you didn't realize was sexist because nobody bothered to explain to you that it is sexist?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A Few Modest Suggestions for Making DU's Presidential OPs More Friendly to Women [View all]
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
OP
See the forest as well as the trees---it makes finding solutions a lot easier.
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#12
I kind of agree with you, but when used on "women's issues" for a female candidate it does
cui bono
Feb 2015
#17
It isn't just Clinton. Sen. Nelson in Texas Senate (GOP) is very interested in "women's issues"
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#4
IMHO every mention of Christie's weight deserves censure. It is a mean, rude attack.
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#9
Disagree strongly. Obesity is well-documented as correlating with very high mortality.
closeupready
Feb 2015
#13
Well that's really nitpicking. Just substitute another example that works for you then.
cui bono
Feb 2015
#25
I think everyone should just express themselves freely, and not worry about
dissentient
Feb 2015
#19
Yes, then they can be banned if they say racist stuff. Better that, then they try and be sneaky
dissentient
Feb 2015
#23
But there are many people who aren't really racist or sexist but say things that are offensive
cui bono
Feb 2015
#24
I agree, good point! I think the ones in charge should declare it when they want new rules for the
dissentient
Feb 2015
#28
Check one of my OP's and scroll down. Unless the writer deleted it. "Good on women and children
McCamy Taylor
Feb 2015
#38
Honestly, in a duscussion of a candidate I don't think the "but" negates what was said before.
cui bono
Feb 2015
#39
Funny, the same argument could be made about mental illness and how stigma of it is promoted
HereSince1628
Feb 2015
#32
do you mean more friendly to Hillary? because I have not seen any of these on du
Doctor_J
Feb 2015
#35