Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Wella

(1,827 posts)
16. A very vapid and foolish response to a serious issue
Sat Feb 28, 2015, 05:56 PM
Feb 2015

This is how I know you really don't understand.

Not scary, really. This is lame, IMO. Also, it exposes them closeupready Feb 2015 #1
Which political party is doing this? randys1 Feb 2015 #2
And yet DOMA was exactly this sort of legislation and it had massive Democratic support and Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #5
OK, I get all that. All I have EVER said is that if the choice is any republican vs any democrat randys1 Feb 2015 #6
DOMA, as bad as it was, wasn't remotely comparable dsc Feb 2015 #7
Clintonian historical revisionism - there was NEVER a threat of Constitutional Amendment. closeupready Feb 2015 #8
Yes there surely was dsc Feb 2015 #9
"muttering about compromise" Egnever Feb 2015 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2015 #15
We can't give teh Gays the special right ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #3
I don't understand this damnedifIknow Feb 2015 #4
Homophobes are demented individuals and do not process emotions and thoughts as RKP5637 Feb 2015 #27
I'm very thankful that the WV House killed HB2881 Rhythm Feb 2015 #10
I'm going to say something unpopular here about GLBT strategy Wella Feb 2015 #11
"stop destroying the privacy of political donors" - fuck that. closeupready Feb 2015 #12
Then you will reap what you sow...including your own unpopular donations being made public Wella Feb 2015 #13
That's democracy. If you want a theocracy, move to Saudi Arabia. closeupready Feb 2015 #14
A very vapid and foolish response to a serious issue Wella Feb 2015 #16
You are loony. That's the issue here. Get out more. closeupready Feb 2015 #21
This is your argument? Wella Feb 2015 #23
Do you know how you appear, tho? bravenak Feb 2015 #28
You don't get political stategy do you? Wella Mar 2015 #31
Yes. You have myopic narcissism. It is a problem. bravenak Mar 2015 #32
I think you are projecting. And you haven't understood the logic. Wella Mar 2015 #41
You have no logic. bravenak Mar 2015 #43
What you mean is, "I don't like your logical breakdown of the situation." Wella Mar 2015 #44
See ya around. bravenak Mar 2015 #45
Your arguments are ludicrous! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2015 #29
No, they are actually quite logical; they're just not common in our current discourse Wella Mar 2015 #46
Actually, I do see some merit in what you say, in that pushing the envelop for the RKP5637 Mar 2015 #49
you do not have a right to my or anyone else's money dsc Feb 2015 #17
No one is talking about rights here, but about political strategy. Wella Feb 2015 #18
It has nothing to do with outrage dsc Feb 2015 #19
This is not about shopping: this is about overall political strategy Wella Feb 2015 #24
Mozilla is hardly a mom and pop operation dsc Feb 2015 #26
But bakeries are. Wella Mar 2015 #30
Should blacks have been gracious winners by not insisting on being served in businesses? dsc Mar 2015 #35
These bakeries are not strictly denying service to gays and lesbians Wella Mar 2015 #36
This is a crazy argument. bravenak Mar 2015 #37
No, it is a logical argument that shows the differences between the GLBT and African American cases Wella Mar 2015 #38
They won't do wedding cakes at a bakery? bravenak Mar 2015 #39
They serve all customers; they don't make all kinds of cakes. Wella Mar 2015 #47
Yeah, but they make wedding cakes for straights? bravenak Mar 2015 #48
You are an apologist for bigotry. Arugula Latte Mar 2015 #53
You're right, your opinion is unpopular here justiceischeap Mar 2015 #40
Wow. "Let's pander to homophobes who are against equal rights for Americans." Arugula Latte Mar 2015 #50
The owner is free to spend his money..... daleanime Mar 2015 #51
Sometimes I miss moderators. LeftyMom Mar 2015 #54
We ARE gracious winners. Jamastiene Mar 2015 #55
Shouldn't these laws be easily challenged as unconstitutional? Egnever Feb 2015 #22
'State preemption' is not uncommon; there's been a lot of talk about petronius Mar 2015 #33
The best part for the best rendition seveneyes Feb 2015 #25
AS scary as they are, there are some even more scary. Behind the Aegis Mar 2015 #34
In some places, states are going as far writing legislation justiceischeap Mar 2015 #42
What is wrong with these people that they contort the laws like this to hurt gays? Kath1 Mar 2015 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Homophobes Have Invented ...»Reply #16