Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
23. Imagine being in a fight with your worst enemy.
Sun Mar 8, 2015, 01:12 PM
Mar 2015

It's a cage match, to the death. Your opponent has spent the weeks leading up to the fight studying all available training film on you. He's been studying your sparing matches, and working his ass off to make sure he's ready for you.

You refuse to view any film on your opponent. It's available online, and you not only refuse to see it, but you fire and insult people who watch the films as traitors to your victory. Before the announced match, you were both pretty evenly matched, with your opponent a little stronger than you, and you were considered a little smarter.

Who wins? The answer almost certainly is, your opponent. Because Your opponent crafted his fight for you, while you crafted yours to the imaginary fight you hoped to have with them.

So what you ask? So what does this have to do with Politics? In 2014 Democrats were counting on the Republicans to make a mistake like in 2012 with the famous Real Rape quote. The Republicans instead focused on paying lip service to issues while the Democrats were sticking with their place holder campaign plan War on Women. Republicans studied the polling, realized that issues were what the people wanted to hear about, and talked about those issues. Democrats ignored the issues, planning instead on the winning strategy from 2012, wait for the Republicans to self destruct. Then on election day, the Democrats were astonished to see the Republicans take the Senate, and keep taking control with a four seat comfort zone. Ten seats in all after the runoff in Louisiana, ten invaluable seats that we could have won, if we had watched and learned our opponents obvious plans.

So the preparations for 2016 are on. We're training up. Once again, the Republicans are watching us, studying our moves, and planning on how to counter them. We are again refusing to even look at the opponent for fear that we'll see something we don't like. Once again we're going into the match hoping that the Republicans will oblige us and fight the way we wish they would, while they intend to fight us the way we're going to in reality. They learned from 2012, and we haven't learned from 2014 yet. The question is, will we learn?

I don't know. Einstein was asked about the difference between Genius and Stupidity. Einstein said that Genius has its limits.

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins148851.html

Really, really interesting article, Segami RiverLover Mar 2015 #1
"...If Clinton wants to rebuild trust with voters.. Segami Mar 2015 #2
Its too bad Media Matters is run by Hillary's David Brock. RiverLover Mar 2015 #3
David Brock reflects on his Clinton evolution Segami Mar 2015 #4
that explains a lot. transactionalism at its best. nashville_brook Mar 2015 #5
I was really surprised when I learned that, from a fellow DUer RiverLover Mar 2015 #21
i'm sure there's a historical narrative about Brock's switch from conservative to nashville_brook Mar 2015 #22
Hillary already had a real primary challenge in 2003. So real, she lost. phantom power Mar 2015 #6
Unfortunately Warren is NOT running..... we need to get that fact into our heads groundloop Mar 2015 #7
I want a viable more progressive candidate Cryptoad Mar 2015 #15
Segami, here's my thing on Hillary... nashville_brook Mar 2015 #8
most excellent! ellennelle Mar 2015 #9
actually moved to Flori-duh :) nashville_brook Mar 2015 #10
Couldn't have said it better myself. Even if I thought Ms Clinton would fight for the Nay Mar 2015 #12
if the voters aren't excited about the nominee...if it's just "her time" nashville_brook Mar 2015 #16
Agreed. It's not hard to see that Dem voters aren't showing up because they feel Nay Mar 2015 #25
Agreed. And too think.. Segami Mar 2015 #14
oppo research on the Clintons is a corporate endeavor at this point. nashville_brook Mar 2015 #17
What is next on DU Cryptoad Mar 2015 #11
Imagine being in a fight with your worst enemy. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #23
I don't want a 'curbed' or 'reined in' candidate by any name HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #13
The problem as I see it is sadoldgirl Mar 2015 #20
I think if Elizabeth Warren chose to get in, she would be a viable contender. Vinca Mar 2015 #18
Exactly! RiverLover Mar 2015 #24
this is *the* gail sheehy? has she no editors? are all papers computer-generated these days? ND-Dem Mar 2015 #19
Same old same old, nothing new here, nothing here to promote Warren, nothing for anyone to put their Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #26
In 2012, the New York Daily News endorsed Romney Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary's Only Hope To Ta...»Reply #23