General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Yes, GMO's are great and here is why... [View all]MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Not ETHICAL to cite a retracted study? That's interesting, since it actually is MORE ethical to show how a study was retracted against hundreds of scientists from around the world, due to correlation of rat data to human.
Meanwhile, you discard all human data you don't find compelling to support a science web site that has NO peer reviewed studies
just the ones to make peer reviewed studies look bad while having the audacity to call itself "science based medicine". What hogwash.
Reconsider what IS scientifically based and do yourself a favor reading outside of your own ideology. Posters who say "I won't bother" with actual research are nothing more than ideologues themselves.
If you don't know any better, then get someone to explain it to you instead of feigning knowledge on this.
Your state about "I won't bother" tells me all I need about "unethical". You just made the list on unethical. Being unimpressed by reading more than the articles you aim to de-bunk is actually a badge of honor to those of us who pursue peer reviewed studies directly affecting morbidity and mortality.
Good luck