HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Montana Invents Fun Scien... » Reply #33

Response to strawberries (Reply #27)

Thu Mar 19, 2015, 03:07 PM

33. It's the same dishonest, malicious strategy.

Women have the right to abortion. There is no "20 week" exception. There is no, "Well, the idiots have now decided they 'don't buy' the science on fetal development, so they've decided to force women to undergo increased complication, expense and danger" exception.

It's just another attempt to imply that abortion is "baby killing," which it still is not, and to stop women from having abortions, which is still illegal to do.

The racist South did not want to accept that black people are human beings who can vote and go to school and eat in restaurants, and so raised all kinds of other "concerns" about whether people could pass poll tests, or pay a "fee," or, more recently, obtain enough proof of identification. The concerns are always lies, cutely tailored to imply that something is wrong with the target of the bigotry.

A poll test, to "make sure people are educated enough to vote." Which happens to impact the poor or the recently enslaved, who may not read as well, but whose rights are equal nevertheless.

A tax, which just happens to once again raise a barrier to the poor. The pretense is again that there is some other need or concern.

But the "concerns" are always lies and pretense. Racists and conservatives really just don't want non-whites or the poor to vote, so they devise barriers based on geography or the ability to drive somewhere or to be off of work in the middle of the week, or to put enough documents together to get the right form of ID. In each case, the "concern" being addressed is a facade.

And so now, with the misogynist anti-abortionists, we have so many new "concerns." It is illegal to impede the right to abortion, so we will add some thoughtful "licensing" requirements for clinics, to make them "safer." But that is a sneering pretense, like the poll tax or voter ID. The clinics get closed, the anti-abortionists get what they want, which is to find another way to deny another group of people their human rights.

And it's not as though this is some opinion of mine. Republicans cackle openly about their recent onslaught of "concerned" legislation effectively ending the right to abortion in state after state.

They're achieving illegal ends by (questionably) legal means, and they think it's just adorable, the way they can hurt people by subverting the law.

Before that, we had the "partial-birth abortion" canard, an invented procedure falsely implying babies about to be born were being "aborted." That was never really a thing, but the fake concern worked, restrictions were passed, and the camel's nose was under the tent.

Apparently this year's Jim Crow anti-abortion "concern" is the "20-week abortion?" As you note, there is no science or reasoning behind this new magic date that is supposed to again mean that nearly-born "babies" are being aborted, but as always, the ignorant, malicious bigot's "concern" is enough to accomplish the real goal of interfering with rights they wish to take from others.

This cutesy legislative concern trolling over abortion, which is not so cute really, because it will kill women who need a medical procedure to which they an absolute right, is the same trick, by many of the same people, and it's fooling no one, and it will end in shame on the trash heap of history with the rest of the bigotry and ignorance and hatred the world is slowly by surely tossing aside.



Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 45 replies Author Time Post
niyad Mar 2015 OP
cali Mar 2015 #1
niyad Mar 2015 #2
cali Mar 2015 #3
strawberries Mar 2015 #4
Brickbat Mar 2015 #8
strawberries Mar 2015 #11
cali Mar 2015 #23
strawberries Mar 2015 #26
jeff47 Mar 2015 #12
strawberries Mar 2015 #14
jeff47 Mar 2015 #16
strawberries Mar 2015 #18
jeff47 Mar 2015 #21
cali Mar 2015 #20
Post removed Mar 2015 #25
NickB79 Mar 2015 #32
DirkGently Mar 2015 #28
strawberries Mar 2015 #31
DirkGently Mar 2015 #34
LiberalLoner Mar 2015 #41
strawberries Mar 2015 #43
LiberalLoner Mar 2015 #44
strawberries Mar 2015 #29
jeff47 Mar 2015 #30
cali Mar 2015 #37
strawberries Mar 2015 #39
GreatGazoo Mar 2015 #36
REP Mar 2015 #5
strawberries Mar 2015 #7
jeff47 Mar 2015 #13
strawberries Mar 2015 #15
jeff47 Mar 2015 #17
strawberries Mar 2015 #19
jeff47 Mar 2015 #22
LynneSin Mar 2015 #6
strawberries Mar 2015 #9
LynneSin Mar 2015 #35
tammywammy Mar 2015 #42
hobbit709 Mar 2015 #10
DirkGently Mar 2015 #24
strawberries Mar 2015 #27
LineLineLineReply It's the same dishonest, malicious strategy.
DirkGently Mar 2015 #33
cwydro Mar 2015 #38
ismnotwasm Mar 2015 #40
niyad Mar 2015 #45
Please login to view edit histories.