Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)

5. Most certainly has. Thanks for addressing this fact.

Reply to upaloopa (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 19, 2015, 03:43 PM

Mar 2015

*

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

regarding the jury system: [View all] NM_Birder Mar 2015 OP

We need to stop taking a jury decision personally upaloopa Mar 2015 #1

+1, n/t RKP5637 Mar 2015 #2

Honestly i couldn't even understand why the post was alerted, NM_Birder Mar 2015 #3

How do you know who alerts on you ? NM_Birder Mar 2015 #4

Most certainly has. Thanks for addressing this fact. misterhighwasted Mar 2015 #5

I don't think that would work melman Mar 2015 #6

not saying to disguise what is said NM_Birder Mar 2015 #8

But how would that work? melman Mar 2015 #11

I like to review the context of the post when I'm on a jury alcibiades_mystery Mar 2015 #7

I think the accused should be able to face their accusers. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2015 #9

In before the lock. MohRokTah Mar 2015 #10

Locking. MineralMan Mar 2015 #12

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»regarding the jury system...»Reply #5