Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

edhopper

(33,573 posts)

7. The WSJ

Reply to pampango (Original post)

Sun May 6, 2012, 10:11 AM

May 2012

was always known to have a very right wing Op/Ed page while maintaining a good, unbiased News division.
Since Murdock bought the paper the News division has become highly suspect and it's Foxification is apparent.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Krugman: "in 2008 the Wall Street Journal ... knew – knew – that there was no housing bubble... [View all] pampango May 2012 OP

The best comment left for Krugman: rgbecker May 2012 #1

Interesting. I did not know this about the WSJ. nt Honeycombe8 May 2012 #2

Du rec. Nt xchrom May 2012 #3

When you get your opinions straight from Rupert, they're guaranteed to be wrong for America. Scuba May 2012 #4

"falcon liar" lunatica May 2012 #5

I think RoseMead May 2012 #8

I *think* it means "full of sh*t," but I'm not sure... Nay May 2012 #9

I like Paul Krugman just as he is - intelligent, honest, bearded and liberal. Thank you Paul for jwirr May 2012 #6

The WSJ edhopper May 2012 #7

The Laffer Curve AlbertCat May 2012 #10

Very true. I think that's one of the reasons that evangelicals are part of their Marr May 2012 #13

There will be pie in the sky, by and by pscot May 2012 #15

Hah - "use 'impact' as a verb". ZING! Krugman could also start using coalition_unwilling May 2012 #11

It is just BIZARRE what is accepted as "economic' truth in this country Cosmocat May 2012 #12

The WSJ is a propaganda sheet and the financially religious love to read it. rhett o rick May 2012 #14

My Only Quibble Is With Krugman's Use DallasNE May 2012 #16

A very pertinent link DonCoquixote May 2012 #17