Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why all of a sudden is it so important Hillary have competition within the party? [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)64. If we're on the misogyny issue then 2008 doesn't mean much
Because Hillary was in it. The reasons people wanted her out was that she was not able to win by that point.
So the question on misogyny really is before 2008, was there ever a time there was a candidate who started out in good position but people thought that person needed opposition? Or was there simply opposition?
Did people think someone should run against Gore just to do so?
Although both Gore and Bradley showed comparable success in terms of fund-raising, Bradley lagged behind Gore in many polls from the start and never gained a competitive position. Despite the late endorsement of the Des Moines Register,[8] Bradley went on to be defeated in the Iowa Caucus; Gore garnered 64% of the votes, while Bradley received only 35%.[9] Gore won the primary competition in New Hampshire as well, though by a significantly smaller margin, receiving 52% to Bradleys 47%. After a resounding defeat on Super Tuesday, with Bradley failing to carry the majority of delegates in a single state, he withdrew from the race on March 9.[10]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2000
Did that help the Democrats win that election? We know how it turned out. It was close enough for the Republicans to exploit the opportunity to get it into the courts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why all of a sudden is it so important Hillary have competition within the party? [View all]
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
OP
I disagree. 2008 had 2 major Democratic candidates, and I don't think there was anyone who thought
still_one
Apr 2015
#1
Well, after McCain got the repuke nod, it was well known Obama had it in the bag-
snooper2
Apr 2015
#37
It was, but there were many calls for her to concede and criticisms when she didn't.
boston bean
Apr 2015
#43
Well at someone point it is reasonable to make the case that a primary candidate should conceded
aikoaiko
Apr 2015
#53
My desire to have competition in the primary is to be able to get the issues out. When we have only
jwirr
Apr 2015
#50
That was wrong. A candidate should make that decision themselves. But now, are you asking
sabrina 1
Apr 2015
#68
You can call me out all day long, since you do nothing but attack Hillary and those who support
NoJusticeNoPeace
Apr 2015
#10
Those calls for conceding occurred because it was statistically impossible for her to win.
Renaissance Man
Apr 2015
#17
As soon as the issue was mentioned, Kerry said that he did not think that the superdelegates
karynnj
Apr 2015
#107
Please provide a link to anyone of any stature saying she should drop out in January
karynnj
Apr 2015
#109
Here you go.... It's a little difficult to search nearly 8 year old articles
boston bean
Apr 2015
#110
I'm not limiting anything - and why should I do a DU search for something I don't think exists
karynnj
Apr 2015
#113
I think your challenging this is bizarre, when we pretty much agree with eachother.
boston bean
Apr 2015
#114
If there are any cobwebs left to be cleared better to be done in the primaries
LynneSin
Apr 2015
#18
That disadvantage would also be an advantage. The more attention on Repubs and what they believe
stevenleser
Apr 2015
#31
It looks like you're saying Hilary should run unopposed, but you have a Bernie sig
Reter
Apr 2015
#33
I didn't "demand" but certainly wanted somebody to challenge Bill Clinton in '96.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2015
#38
Easy. '68 and '80 the party pushed one person above all. Many people demanded that MAN be tested.
ieoeja
Apr 2015
#73
Oh, that's a big fat fail. I've always been an advocate of competitive primaries.
winter is coming
Apr 2015
#87
It there is no other candidate, then the choice is the candidate that there is. But still...
liberal N proud
Apr 2015
#105
A primary challenge in 2008 resulted in control of the White House for eight years.
cherokeeprogressive
Apr 2015
#115