General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A question for HRC supporters ... [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)What a telling response. Thank you.
My vote, and the vote of anyone else on this board, is none of your business, of course. If, with that comment, you planned to go on to reference the TOS, you should recall that the TOS has to do with writing posts that advocate candidates other than the Democratic nominee. I, and many others here, are trying very hard right now to ensure that we do not have a corporate-purchased candidate with a predatory agenda forced down our throats and the country's throat as the Democratic nominee this time. That's because we care about the party and the nation and the millions being exploited and destroyed, and we want the monied corruption to end.
Part of doing that is pointing out the rhetorical manipulations that are used to normalize the corporate perversion of our electoral system and how Americans understand it.
Sometimes you need to reiterate that 2+2=4, and, in this case, 2+2=4 means that, in a democracy, a candidate has a responsibility to EARN votes. They are not owed based on team color, particularly to a candidate with a long and documented history of working against the people for corporate and MIC interests.
I think my point is pretty clear here, and I do not wish to respond to another attempt at deflection from the point or to kick this sort of OP again. So...you have a nice day.