General Discussion

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)

20. She's a politician.

Reply to polichick (Reply #3)

Sun Apr 26, 2015, 03:07 PM

Apr 2015

So, probably.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is Elizabeth Warren Doing Obama's Bidding? [View all] Buzz Clik Apr 2015 OP

Maybe. Both are brilliant, and both are future past presidents! NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #1

I thought she wasn't allowed to talk about the details. CJCRANE Apr 2015 #2

So EW is a lying sack of shit? polichick Apr 2015 #3

She's a politician. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #20

NOPE! Not even a funny joke. diabeticman Apr 2015 #4

It's not a joke, but it makes more sense than taking all this insanity at face value. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #7

It makes exactly no sense. cali Apr 2015 #11

Thank You I was just about to say that. diabeticman Apr 2015 #12

You already did. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #14

cali, you have no room to talk on this. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #13

I sure do. I don't make up crazy shit. I post links to well respected sources for my claims cali Apr 2015 #17

I never claimed this was more than pure speculation. I was honest about that. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #18

yes. I can. cali Apr 2015 #24

I'm not referring to history, analysis, or statistics. Just facts about TPP... Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #39

Post Links?? I disagree as to the link thing. Everyday you post opinion pieces. misterhighwasted Apr 2015 #30

here ya go, and FAIL cali Apr 2015 #37

Haahaa. Really? You post opinion pieces every day. misterhighwasted Apr 2015 #38

lol another scared poster cali Apr 2015 #42

Better than your Torquemada approach to any dissension . orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #75

I mean...do you really think this? tritsofme Apr 2015 #5

No. I actually think she is Hillary's attack dog on this issue. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #6

The rethugs have liked it all along. Why do you think he waited for a rethug senate majority before RiverLover Apr 2015 #8

"Man, I can't stand RWrs, either party." Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #9

your op is what you claim to hate. a textbook case. cali Apr 2015 #33

Bullshit, cali. I am not painting my speculation as "history, analysis, statistics, and facts." Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #45

YOU said you couldn't abide "non-thinking" cali Apr 2015 #55

no, that's beyond ridiculous and shows no understanding of the history involved. cali Apr 2015 #10

If I recall correctly, NAFTA was supported by the president pro-tem of the Senate. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #15

what does that have to do with the facts I posted? nothing cali Apr 2015 #21

Just a little history and analysis. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #58

gad. It is neither cali Apr 2015 #62

You've been keeping a pretty low threshold for credibility. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #63

There was no purpose to this OP aspirant Apr 2015 #78

excellent cali RobertEarl Apr 2015 #16

Kinda like rejecting the TPP with zero knowledge of what's inside. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #19

we have some knowledge. wish we had more, but yes the three leaked draft chapters, analysis cali Apr 2015 #23

We can't even say for certain what stage these three chapters are in. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #40

When the theory become fact, is it too late? aspirant Apr 2015 #25

NO! There's a public comment period and a full vote of Congress. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #43

After fast track is passed with no amendments and filibusters, aspirant Apr 2015 #77

Here's some knowledge of what's inside. RiverLover Apr 2015 #26

That seems like a reach pscot Apr 2015 #22

Wondered the same thing. Sienna86 Apr 2015 #27

hey, are the other 150+ congressional dems in on this too? cali Apr 2015 #28

Nothing surprises me anymore. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #47

The GOP is not reserving judgment, they like it just fine. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #29

breathtakingly so. cali Apr 2015 #31

"...their masters..." Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #46

that should be obvious: Corporations cali Apr 2015 #50

Ah. Please provide a list of the corporations that wrote this agreement. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #52

what does your demand have to do with republicans being owned by corporations cali Apr 2015 #60

Thank you! This was what I was waiting for. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #61

collapse? you've lost it. cali Apr 2015 #65

Your aim is poor, not unexpectedly. truebluegreen Apr 2015 #66

slow motion train wreck. he knows I didn't claim any such thing. cali Apr 2015 #68

Yes, you seem to be his bete noire, truebluegreen Apr 2015 #69

Yep. That is enough to me Aerows Apr 2015 #57

Interesting idea MFrohike Apr 2015 #32

+ 10000 This ^ misterhighwasted Apr 2015 #35

very good counterpoints. liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #36

mkay Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #48

Sorry MFrohike Apr 2015 #54

Is that the 100th level chess he's playing again? liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #34

No. That's gibberish nonsense. GoneFishin Apr 2015 #41

It belongs in creative speculation cali Apr 2015 #44

+1 for creative speculation. nt truebluegreen Apr 2015 #67

Gibberish? Were you unable to comprehend my sentences? Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #49

Not a... sendero Apr 2015 #51

Really? She has provided nothing of substance to oppose other than the secrecy. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #53

if it is approved. cali Apr 2015 #56

Damned convenient, that. Don't you think? Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #59

Fail. You're really showing a lack of knowledge here. RiverLover Apr 2015 #64

It's hard to debate ... sendero Apr 2015 #71

And the republicans are doing his bidding by pretending to love it, so that Dems will hate it? arcane1 Apr 2015 #70

I do believe the TPP is not nearly as bad as EW describes it, but I think she's Hoyt Apr 2015 #72

we already have formal alliances with those nations cali Apr 2015 #73

The GOP is not blocking this agreement. former9thward Apr 2015 #74

Since Shrub, Bipartisanship screws the rest of us, on almost every subject . orpupilofnature57 Apr 2015 #76