Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(65,227 posts)
3. More information about the case. The woman was mentally handicapped and hadn't even done
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:55 PM
Apr 2015

anything when accosted by the cop. He never was able to explain why he stopped her in the first place.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/prosecutors-prison-officers-taser-case-30608287

Officers Who Used Taser 8 Times on Disabled Woman Get Prison

<SNIP>

Davis, who had lived in the city of 7,000 most of her life, was walking from one house to another around 1:30 one night in April 2013 when Walters stopped her. Walters has never made it clear what happened, but he ended up shooting her with his Taser, then following up with four more shocks after demanding she put her hands behind her back but giving her no time to respond, according to his plea agreement <emphasis added>.

When Brown arrived as backup, Davis was in handcuffs and Walters was removing the Taser probes from her back. Brown said it appeared one of Davis' hands had slipped from her improperly applied handcuffs and he ordered everyone to move away and shocked Davis again, even though she was not trying to fight or escape, according to his plea agreement.

Brown shocked Davis twice more, then offered to let her go if he could shoot her in the forehead one more time with his Taser <emphasis added>, prosecutors said.

<SNIP>

"That's not me. That wasn't me. I made one mistake <emphasis added>. Now I am going to pay the ultimate price," Walters said.

<SNIP>



Yeah, sure--he only made this one little bitty "mistake," joining in on the torture of a handcuffed mentally disabled woman who was helpless, compliant, and apparently innocent of any wrongdoing in the first place.

Look at this passage from the same article:

When fellow officers asked Brown why he shocked the handcuffed woman, he replied he "did not want to touch that nasty (obscenity)," according to the plea agreement Brown signed last October.



This is the one who said he'd let her go if she let him tase her again in the forehead (!). He was just having a bit of sadistic fun. You can bet he made a habit of this sort of thing--and so did that idiot Walters. No way this was the first time for him, either, especially since he can't even explain what he stopped her for int he first place. He was just out hunting for a likely victim to play his sadistic games with.

Oh, and the idiot doesn't realize that "paying the ultimate price" means dying or being killed for something, not getting the absolute minimum sentence possible for his crime; "The sentence for both Walters and Brown were <sic> well under the 10-year maximum for the deprivation of rights under color of law charge each pleaded guilty to in October <emphasis added>."
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI: Two Former Marion Po...»Reply #3