Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why is the party scared of Alan Grayson? [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)124. "Insiders" don't listen to "outsiders."
As Larry Summers explained to Elizabeth Warren:
He teed it up this way: I had a choice. I could be an insider or I could be an outsider. Outsiders can say whatever they want. But people on the inside dont listen to them. Insiders, however, get lots of access and a chance to push their ideas. People powerful people listen to what they have to say. But insiders also understand one unbreakable rule: They dont criticize other insiders.
I had been warned.
I had been warned.
http://billmoyers.com/2014/09/05/i-had-been-warned/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
144 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
this is a must read --> Are Democratic Leaders "Tea Partying" The Progressives?
nashville_brook
May 2015
#10
I believe you're right. Faux liberals on Fux news. The Medium is the Message, unfortunately.
erronis
May 2015
#33
the best ways to donate in Orlando are directly to the candidates you love
nashville_brook
May 2015
#100
Alan Grayson has some serious issues that won't play well with voters. Consider his remarks
okaawhatever
May 2015
#14
you've articulated perfectly the attack platform the party has laid out.
nashville_brook
May 2015
#15
Grayson was really coming up fast & great! esp. speaking out on heathcare on the House
appalachiablue
May 2015
#41
Thank goodness Hillary's pay-to-play State Dept., records misconduct, and marital problems
whereisjustice
May 2015
#20
No, it's that most Democrats realize Hillary didn't have a pay-to-play State Dept., there isn't
okaawhatever
May 2015
#22
$300,000 a speech buys a lot of influence doesn't it? Of course that's the discount rate. How was
whereisjustice
May 2015
#96
So the Rolling Stones are indebtted to the coliseum where they perform because they get paid
okaawhatever
May 2015
#103
"your b.s. about the DNC kissing Wall Street's ass is fucking precious" -- i'd alert on this, but
nashville_brook
May 2015
#123
theres an even more legitimate question whether Murphy can win statewide.
nashville_brook
May 2015
#17
Murphy WAS a Republican, right up until he challenged West. So he fit right in.
djean111
May 2015
#26
I don't like Murphy as a candidate, but I do understand why many former Republicans
okaawhatever
May 2015
#47
Oh, Murphy doesn't want to be a Democrat, he wants the Democratic Party to be Republican.
djean111
May 2015
#50
Thanks for the info. I didn't realize he was that bad. I think I like him mainly because he spared
okaawhatever
May 2015
#54
That's because he's one of the worst Democrats in Congress and his "conversions"
TeamPooka
May 2015
#64
And what about the big Democratic party donor who is Grayson's friend and attorney who has
okaawhatever
May 2015
#24
It isn't ONE donor. It's a big donor who is also his good friend and lawyer. Why are you
okaawhatever
May 2015
#31
I'm not saying one voter can veto a campaign. What I continue to say, and everyone fails to
okaawhatever
May 2015
#62
i read the POLITICO article too. everyone knows John Morgan's position.
nashville_brook
May 2015
#81
I believe it's because they're running away from the charge that they're commies.
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2015
#32
They're proud of the idea that they can make the rich richer than Republicans.
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2015
#48
there' Dems in this thread who believe that not only Wall Street, but any big donor
nashville_brook
May 2015
#72
this is what i'm saying in the post -- there's people in our own party who'd rather
nashville_brook
May 2015
#79
It's more than insulting terms, and it's done in a way that is driving away voters:
okaawhatever
May 2015
#43
Maybe using the image of Klansmen is okay with you, but it is deeply offensive
okaawhatever
May 2015
#65
and that'll just be Grayson's decision -- when the party attacks, i'll be there to call them out.
nashville_brook
May 2015
#120
It really is about l vs 99%, Occupy had it right, we are slow to realize how powerful the meaning of
mother earth
May 2015
#44
Absolutely, Grayson is one of our best, and I agree about O'Rourke, he is so sickening to listen
mother earth
May 2015
#90
Is the purpose of this thread to vent against "The Party Bosses" or do you want an answer?
brooklynite
May 2015
#46
I agree, they marginalize them quickly, the Dean scream, 1-2 punch to a fast rising star with solid
mother earth
May 2015
#91
Compare the compensation for serving office versus being a lobbyist once you leave
GoneFishin
May 2015
#88
Well said, it is truly kabuki theater...money trumps all. I think your reply nails it. nt
mother earth
May 2015
#92
they've repeatedly shown they'd rather have a conservadem who's behind in the polls than an electabl
MisterP
May 2015
#107
unless the strategy is simply to keep progressives from advancing to higher office.
nashville_brook
May 2015
#112
How much richer is Tester since he went to Washington? How would I find that out? nt
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2015
#99
same numbskulls who thought it was a bad idea for Grimes to say she'd voted for Obama
nashville_brook
May 2015
#121
Hillary is the biggest easy target for Rs. party machinery isn't afraid of that.
nashville_brook
May 2015
#110