Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
144. From your reactions... the ONLY senator to blame for a cloture vote is Bernie Sanders.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 03:11 AM
Jun 2015

Never mind the other 76 senators who voted with him.

Didn't he vote against it originally, when that vote was hardest, and also against the first merrily May 2015 #1
Specifically which law did he vote for? mythology May 2015 #10
Technically it was a vote to limit debate or cloture. DCBob May 2015 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author TDale313 May 2015 #7
thank you for that clarification. merrily Jun 2015 #107
Yeah I know people don't get this LynneSin Jun 2015 #162
The USA Freedom Act has not been voted on. peecoolyour May 2015 #3
Ahhh ... now I get it! 99Forever May 2015 #6
"shit-stirring chump" Jesus Malverde May 2015 #17
The 17 who voted "Nay" on this PROCEDURAL VOTE were all Republicans. scarletwoman May 2015 #67
The "Freedom Act" ends the surveillance as I understand it. JDPriestly May 2015 #80
Doesn't end anything bl968 May 2015 #100
JDPriestly is one of the most informative and level headed posters on DU. cui bono Jun 2015 #137
If the phone company keeps the records and the NSA/CIA/contractor, etc. has to get a specific warran JDPriestly Jun 2015 #147
Gee, I guess all the disgruntled people on this thread will be voting for one of those Republicans? merrily Jun 2015 #120
The amount of misinformation in this thread is mind-boggling. scarletwoman Jun 2015 #123
I can't say I am 100% sure what happened or why, but I'm willing to try to find out before I start merrily Jun 2015 #127
Our low information voters number in the tens at least BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #132
PS Please see also Replies 75, 95 and 121, esp. 95. merrily Jun 2015 #128
Bernie explained why he would vote for this tonight on Meet the Press. sabrina 1 May 2015 #84
Chuck Toad was "considerate" enough to put Sanders on the spot about this. merrily Jun 2015 #108
"Guess some shit-stirring chump, was trying to do a smear job." I expect nothing but personal Cha Jun 2015 #150
Procedural votes that gave the legislation legs Jesus Malverde May 2015 #11
The only thing this vote (77-17) did was end debate. peecoolyour May 2015 #20
Actually it stopped any chance of a filibuster Jesus Malverde May 2015 #25
Jesus, is this the bill you are talking about: JDPriestly May 2015 #83
It is on the freedom nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #88
The procedural vote pushes the House version up, & knocks down NSA bulk surveillance HereSince1628 May 2015 #23
Why? What was the logic? TDale313 May 2015 #4
Okay. I'll see what he has to say about that vote. I don't like it one bit. 99Forever May 2015 #5
O'Malley voted Nay bigwillq May 2015 #8
How Clintonian... Joe the Revelator May 2015 #12
Perfect! 99Forever May 2015 #13
He mentioned it on Meet the Press and said why he might vote for it arcane1 May 2015 #9
Hmmm.. a compromise vote. DCBob May 2015 #14
O'Malley was an executive… like the office of President. Not a career politician in Washington. KittyWampus May 2015 #22
***Career politician*** BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #133
without many, many votes that can be cherry-picked, like Sanders and Clinton. KittyWampus Jun 2015 #155
Not being current Senators, Paka May 2015 #86
extremely disappointing. Going to O'Malley's website now to have a look. nationalize the fed May 2015 #15
Well, you for sure won't find anything, since he's not a Senator. scarletwoman Jun 2015 #110
LOL. n/t FSogol Jun 2015 #167
The limited debate procedure gives cover to Senators. MohRokTah May 2015 #16
Not much. Major Hogwash May 2015 #18
In days gone past, the cloture vote was enough cover. MohRokTah May 2015 #19
At least Bernie had the decency not to vote for a war based entirely on lies that KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #105
I have yet to agree with any politician 100% neverforget Jun 2015 #109
No, he voted for limited debate nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #21
He voted to give the legislation a second chance. Jesus Malverde May 2015 #24
75-13... how exactly do you reconcile that? nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #26
That he voted with the majority to limit a filibuster Jesus Malverde May 2015 #27
Let's assume for a second he voted against it nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #28
60 MohRokTah May 2015 #31
Whats that have to do with Bernies vote? Jesus Malverde May 2015 #34
I am, I am calling you on your dishonesty nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #36
IT is no different than voting for cloture. eom MohRokTah May 2015 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author olddots May 2015 #70
Partisans. Gotta love 'em nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #174
IOW, his vote did not matter, even for cloture? Please see Reply 108. merrily Jun 2015 #113
Once They got over 60 it was irrelevant. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #173
Plus, there is no longer a 60 vote threshold because there is no longer a cloture vote. MohRokTah May 2015 #29
Dishonest argument over a procedural vote nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #32
It's the same argument as with a cloture vote. MohRokTah May 2015 #35
like most democrats nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #37
The nly way to stop the bill was for it to fail cloture. MohRokTah May 2015 #41
It is not as black and white as you would like to pretend this is nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #43
So Bernie Sanders is the ONLY Senator who gets a pass on a cloture vote of a bill we don't like. MohRokTah May 2015 #44
More dishonesty nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #45
I further guarantee, 60 will not vote on the final bill. MohRokTah May 2015 #46
That is your convenient narrative nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #49
Then Give Obama a pass for promoting it. MohRokTah May 2015 #50
More twisting of words nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #52
It's reality. Sanders dumped principle for expediency. MohRokTah May 2015 #53
More popcorn nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #55
. MohRokTah May 2015 #58
What expediency? His vote made absolutely no difference. cui bono Jun 2015 #140
+1 cui bono Jun 2015 #139
Obama didn't just promote it, he extended it in 2011. cui bono Jun 2015 #141
Hillary voted for the Patriot Act in 2001. She voted in favor of a compromise renewed act Autumn Jun 2015 #159
77 yeas, 17 mays, 6 not voting. Bernie could have easily stayed out of town and made it 7. Not a merrily Jun 2015 #129
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #166
Actually, so far, out of 77 Senators, he's the only one you're blaming, so just about the opposite merrily Jun 2015 #115
+1 cui bono Jun 2015 #142
What cloak of purity? cui bono Jun 2015 #138
His vote insured nothing. It was not the 60th vote or even close. merrily Jun 2015 #114
Not really...he feels that Amendments can be made to the Freedom Act...... KoKo May 2015 #39
. MohRokTah May 2015 #48
Does anybody see the list of how all the Senators voted on this? Where to find. Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #30
The senate should have posted it by now nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #33
Here nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #40
Thank You! The only people voting No seem to be a few Tea Party people. All the Dems voted Yes Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #61
Exactly nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #63
Bernie could have voted in either direction. For folks to say he's cut from a different cloth Sheepshank May 2015 #90
Except that if he voted NAY nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #91
So Bernie Cheer team got what they wanted with the man who can do no wrong? N/t Sheepshank May 2015 #94
He voted with every democrat nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #98
That just what I said the first time...he's not all that different. Sheepshank Jun 2015 #101
Nah nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #102
Yeah, if he had voted with the teapartiers, we would have heard... Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #149
I'm not sure if he could have voted either way. merrily Jun 2015 #117
Yes, because as we all know, one action defines an entire human being. cui bono Jun 2015 #143
Just the same as those complaining about HRC and her Goldwater connection when she was 17!! Sheepshank Jun 2015 #165
The Goldwater connection needs to die. People change. I want to know what she thinks today. cui bono Jun 2015 #175
you are right.... Sheepshank Jun 2015 #177
Actually, the count was such that his vote was moot, it made no difference to the outcome, typical Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #168
and since that is true...why not vote with the standards he portrays? Sheepshank Jun 2015 #169
Susan Collins is further left than a few Democratic Senators JonLP24 Jun 2015 #156
From the reactions to your thread... MohRokTah May 2015 #42
Strange world..nt Jesus Malverde May 2015 #47
He would not get a pass... SoapBox May 2015 #54
He threw out principle for expediency. MohRokTah May 2015 #56
Every Democrat voted yes on it. Just a handful of Republicans voted no. Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #62
It's cover. MohRokTah May 2015 #65
No he's probably voting for it, he said so on TV today. Every Democrat voted yes today Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #68
Cover, like I said. eom MohRokTah May 2015 #71
Post removed Post removed May 2015 #72
So he has endorsed MY CANDIDATE nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #74
LOL Ok then Cheese Sandwich May 2015 #75
DING, DING. DING nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #76
Absolutely Scootaloo May 2015 #81
You called it. Paka May 2015 #89
Thread win, though Reply 95 is no slouch. merrily Jun 2015 #125
And... aspirant Jun 2015 #131
Yep! Thespian2 Jun 2015 #104
Truth. ^ cui bono Jun 2015 #146
For what expediency? How did his one vote accomplish expediency? cui bono Jun 2015 #145
DING, DING, DING nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #57
Spot on aintitfunny May 2015 #96
+1 uponit7771 May 2015 #77
From your reactions... the ONLY senator to blame for a cloture vote is Bernie Sanders. cui bono Jun 2015 #144
Lie. PowerToThePeople May 2015 #51
Did his vote not limit the ability of other senators to filibuster the law? Jesus Malverde May 2015 #60
I am not going to repeat what Nadin has stated many times above. PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #103
Some here catnhatnh May 2015 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #64
Hey, I had to write a story on this nadinbrzezinski May 2015 #66
I will not denigrate a fellow Democrat. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #69
And Emoprog Golden Boy Rand Paul voted for it last November... Blue_Tires May 2015 #73
Emoprog Jesus Malverde May 2015 #87
So an redassed emoprog spun the definition at UD... Blue_Tires Jun 2015 #106
O RYL? Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #111
Bravo...You've got enough cognitive capacity to utilize DU's search function Blue_Tires Jun 2015 #130
Its actually a good word Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #136
Here's the thing. SusanCalvin May 2015 #78
Doesn't matter. From this point forward, all it takes are 51 votes. MohRokTah May 2015 #82
Which bill is in play? JDPriestly May 2015 #85
Thank you for the clarification! SoapBox May 2015 #97
And that would have been so even if Bernie voted nay. You all are so much fun. merrily Jun 2015 #118
That kind of blind devotion is highly criticized here on DU..... Sheepshank May 2015 #93
Um, no Bernie supporter on this thread gave blind devotion. All are trying to figure out what merrily Jun 2015 #121
Ahhh so Obama rarely deserves similar future explanation, but Bernie does? Sheepshank Jun 2015 #179
At its finest? You must be kidding. You've never seen anything like that and well beyond on DU merrily Jun 2015 #180
"I trust that Bernie has a good reason and will explain it and stand behind it. " Sheepshank Jun 2015 #181
Yes, it's the glaring Hypocrisy.. when they whine about others standing up for who they believe in Cha Jun 2015 #148
To my recollection, I have not "whined." nt SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #153
Key words in your post: cui bono Jun 2015 #178
For you Jesus Malverde William769 May 2015 #79
+100 SoapBox May 2015 #99
IOKIYB Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #170
He did? workinclasszero May 2015 #92
Again for emphasis! TM99 May 2015 #95
Thank you. Couldn't be more obvious if they tried. Please see also Replies 108 and 121. merrily Jun 2015 #124
O.F.F.S. progressoid Jun 2015 #112
WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!! beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #135
Well, the Democrats voted en masse nilesobek Jun 2015 #116
Thanks for the comment. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #119
They did? davidpdx Jun 2015 #158
Are you saying that our Democrats all read every line nilesobek Jun 2015 #189
No, you are implying that ALL the Democrats in Congress at the time did not read the Patriot Act davidpdx Jun 2015 #190
Well I'm sorry Davidpdx. nilesobek Jun 2015 #191
Purity trolling Bernie now?!? ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2015 #122
Yes, but most of the purity trolling of Bernie is coming from Hillary supporters, which is merrily Jun 2015 #126
Yes! Purity trolling! Thank you! And yes! From the "usual screamers"!!! cui bono Jun 2015 #176
Um, I don't think the OP, "Jesus Malverde" is a big Clinton supporter... ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2015 #185
This is the second thread on this line nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #186
Well he's certainly not a Bernie supporter. I was agreeing with you about the purity trolls. cui bono Jun 2015 #187
Well, not for anti-Bernie threads ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2015 #188
Legitimate criticism is not purity trolling. cui bono Jun 2015 #192
I rarely see such admissions by purity trolls... ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2015 #193
If what you say is true, one would be able to point out a purity troll. cui bono Jun 2015 #194
Your lack of self-awareness is astounding ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2015 #195
Oh my... this reminds me of our last go around... cui bono Jun 2015 #196
"the last two Dem presidents, both of whom enacted centrist/Republican policies" ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2015 #197
So now you're saying that Obama is "being deliberately disingenuous or truly is delusional. cui bono Jun 2015 #198
You clearly have reading comprehension issues... ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2015 #199
Thanks for the laugh BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #134
Now that the dust has settled some, it seems Sanders made a vote for cloture that did not affect merrily Jun 2015 #151
So he compromised principles? BumRushDaShow Jun 2015 #152
Agree with with most of that. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #154
Much ado about nothing! B Calm Jun 2015 #157
This thread lost any relevance it had when someone asked how O'Malley and Clinton voted. djean111 Jun 2015 #160
Wow ...he voted with the Democrats? Whodathunkit. L0oniX Jun 2015 #161
Really? A thread like this I would expect from a Faux News Host LynneSin Jun 2015 #163
Cloture means no filibuster Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #164
Not gonna happen. jeff47 Jun 2015 #171
That is very disappointing LittleBlue Jun 2015 #172
A melodramatic lack of knowledge of relevant senate procedures can make a lot of people look rather LanternWaste Jun 2015 #182
You are way too kind nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #184
HAHAHA 9 recs. FlatBaroque Jun 2015 #183
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #144