General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The latest "banning" (NYC_SKP) is an interesting lesson on REPUTATION. [View all]tymorial
(3,433 posts)There are certainly many republicans who are bigoted individuals. They may attempt to proclaim there lack of racism and/or misogyny but inevitably their language eventually reveals their true colors. It is also true that some republicans disagree with the president on matters of policy alone. Yet, how often have we seen those objections summarily written off as stemming from racism and nothing more? I cannot speak to the motivations behind the banning. Though I've lurked for a long time and comment far less, I did not read the offending post or the thread. Therefore I cannot speak to the specifics. I can however see how support for a minority candidate can create strong emotions. Many fully support the president to the point that they cannot reconcile any disagreement of his policies with anything other than racism. For many I believe this is purely an unconscious reaction... it is the only explanation that makes sense to them. For others I do believe it is a means to silence and shame. Imposing guilt is a strong tool. Again, I do not know what the motivations are with NYC_SKP's banning. Please do not think I am intending to pass judgement on the administrators or anyone in general. This is mere observation as to the reality of identity politics in general. I do however anticipate that as we move further into the primaries we will see misogyny linked directly to a lack of support for Clinton even where there is no evidence. If she becomes the candidate and eventually president, many will summarily write off a lack of support as a hatred of women in general.