Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton, the TPP, and Protecting Our Food [View all]Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)50. Isn't Japan the country that refused to buy meat from the U.S. because the U.S.
wouldn't test for mad cow disease?
When did we start becoming so Libertarian stupid with our health?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is criminal negligence. If Japanese food isn't being tested it means that our
Baitball Blogger
Jun 2015
#1
"...radiation levels have returned to normal...." Who says? Wouldn't our main imports be aquatic?
WinkyDink
Jun 2015
#47
There are all sorts of organizations and individuals monitoring radiation levels
Art_from_Ark
Jun 2015
#49
Isn't Japan the country that refused to buy meat from the U.S. because the U.S.
Baitball Blogger
Jun 2015
#50
We have seen financial meltdown that wealthy/connected criminals are no longer prosecuted.
Enthusiast
Jun 2015
#40
The only answer you are going to get here is that Hillary merely followed Obama's orders
djean111
Jun 2015
#2
Thanks! My boss called me in the middle of the night when he heard about it on the news -
djean111
Jun 2015
#32
And this folks is what the TPP is all about--------Sovereignty-------the loss of Sovereignty
turbinetree
Jun 2015
#38
No, Gundersen said it would wipe out all life in the Northern hemisphere by now.
jeff47
Jun 2015
#22
Will you research Sanders's position via Facebook, as Rehm researched his citizenship?
jeff47
Jun 2015
#29
Expressing disagreement with Hillary's official deeds and policies and decisions is not a "negative
djean111
Jun 2015
#30
Oh, you mean like eleventy identical OPs about Bernie voting for the MOST REPREHENSIBLE
djean111
Jun 2015
#34
Calling any criticism of HRC's deeds and policies a negative attack is not helping, IMO.
djean111
Jun 2015
#39