Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Charleston Shooter: Is He Or Isn't He? [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)29. Rightwing violence gets written off as anomalous "bad apple" behavior.
I'm not particularly wound up over whether "terrorism" is applied -- we've abused and tortured (ahem) that term so much that it doesn't carry much meaning at this point.
But what we're seeing isn't just a string of random criminal events either. And you can be sure that if leftwing extremists shot doctors and bombed clinics, murdered police and draped the bodies in Gadsden flags, or pointed rifles at BLM agents because they "don't recognize the authority of the U.S. government, " we'd have a national call to root out the leaders and organizations behind it in a heartbeat.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree that his actions qualified as domestic terrorism, but I suspect his initial motivation
Stardust
Jun 2015
#6
He's a terrorist. No doubt. I think his goal went further than "domestic" though.
MADem
Jun 2015
#10
Unnecessary to meet the legal test; assassination of a political figure is a disjunctive in the definition.
Fred Sanders
Jun 2015
#22
Methinks both Faux Noize and these Republidiots may just be in the making of their own undoing with
nightscanner59
Jun 2015
#28
9/4 UPDATE: Prosecutors calling for death penalty (but not for domestic terrorism)
rocktivity
Sep 2015
#59