Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheOther95Percent

(1,035 posts)
38. Several Biographies Are Worth A Read
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 08:24 AM
Jun 2015

George Washington's views on the institution of slavery evolved over his lifetime. In his last years, Washington believed slavery was a mistake and should be abolished.

I can recommend several biographies. His Excellency by Ellis is the most comprehensive. IMHO, the best treatment of Washington and slavery comes from Wienchek's An Imperfect God.

A quicker read on the evolution of his views on slavery can be found here:

Influenced by the rhetoric of the American Revolution and constant contact with anti-slavery men from the northern colonies and states, George Washington became increasingly critical of the institution of slavery. Tracing the details of his changing views and the reasons for it may not be possible, but there can be no denying the change. He became increasingly eager to see slavery put on the path toward ultimate extinction, although he cautioned, "Time, education, and patience were needed" in the struggle.



"I never mean (unless some particular circumstance should compel me to it) to possess another slave by purchase; it being among my first wishes to see some plan adopted, by which slavery in this country may be abolished by slow, sure, and imperceptible degrees."



After Lafayette purchased in 1786 a plantation in Cayenne to carry out his scheme of emancipating slaves, Washington praised the Frenchman: "Would to God a like spirit would diffuse itself generally into the minds of the people of this country," he wrote, "but I dispair of seeing it. . . . To set the slaves afloat at once would, I really believe, be productive of much inconvenience and mischief; but by degrees it certainly might, and assuredly ought to be, effected."



"I wish from my soul that the legislature of this state could see the policy of a gradual abolition of slavery. It would prevent much mischief."



"… No man desires more heartily than I do [the end of slavery]. Not only do I pray for it on the score of human dignity, but I can clearly foresee that nothing but the rooting out of slavery can perpetuate the existence of our union." [And by the way, GW made clear that if slavery caused a break up of the union, he would cast his lot with the North!]



"The unfortunate condition of the persons whose labour in part I employed, has been the only unavoidable subject of regret. To make the Adults among them as easy & comfortable in their circumstances as their actual state of ignorance and improvidence would admit; and to lay a foundation to prepare the rising generation for a destiny different from that in which they were born, afforded some satisfaction to my mind, and could not I hoped be displeasing to the justice of the Creator."



These quotes, and others that could be given, while heartfelt, must be understood in context or one might reasonably conclude that the first President was an abolitionist. It is important to note that virtually all of GW's anti-slavery quotes were expressed in private correspondence or conversation. During his lifetime, the General never took a public stance against slavery or called for its end. If his growing opposition to slavery was genuine and internalized, why did he not take a more public stand against it and use his unparalleled prestige in the cause of human freedom? This was a calculated decision by the President. It was a matter of priorities. A critic might write, "the only true policy is justice; and he who regards the consequences of an act rather than the justice of it gives no very exalted proof of the greatness of his character," but George Washington knew it was not that simple. In Roger Wilkins words,

He was "politically shackled by the grating chain [racism and slavery] that snaked through the new republic and diminished every life it touched."

http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/henriques/hist615/gwslav.htm

President Washington told Secretary of State Randolph that if the Union ever split, "he had made up his mind to remove and be of the Northern [side]."
"Our men will be compelled to wander like vagabonds" gratuitous Jun 2015 #1
Mr. Benning's Speech to the VA State Convention (Vote of Secession) TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #4
Yes they need to be renamed. neverforget Jun 2015 #2
Could we JackInGreen Jun 2015 #71
That stuck in my father's craw n/t JustAnotherGen Jun 2015 #3
I Cannot Fathom A Reason For It To Continue TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #6
My dad entered the military in the late 1950's JustAnotherGen Jun 2015 #30
+ 1 DashOneBravo Jun 2015 #90
Very interesting. femmocrat Jun 2015 #5
Thanks for the Rec. TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #7
First step would be to repeal the law making Confederate soldiers US veterans Kaleva Jun 2015 #8
Or Pass A Law Making Confederate Service Ineligible for Naming Rights. TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #9
Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #14
I think you miss the point. TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #16
That would only affect those who served exclusivly in the confederate military. Angleae Jun 2015 #33
Are you going to dig up the thousands of Confederate soldiers buried at Arlington? former9thward Jun 2015 #75
Yes. Tear that thing down. mwrguy Jun 2015 #76
The Union soldiers beat you to it in Savannah. nt B2G Jun 2015 #79
Ridiculous. former9thward Jun 2015 #80
Move it to your front yard if you like it so much mwrguy Jun 2015 #81
The law I refer to was passed in 1958 Kaleva Jun 2015 #86
I think Obama has the better approach. former9thward Jun 2015 #87
Damn, I agree with GHWB on something. nt awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #89
They should have never been considered US veterans... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #88
Would you support the bulldozing and destruction of confederate Graves? n/t oneshooter Jun 2015 #10
Reductio ad absurdum TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #17
So how you feel about our capitol named for a slave owning Virginian? Telcontar Jun 2015 #19
Do you mean the only Founder to free his slaves at his death? TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #22
Owning slaves is ok as long as you free them at your death? NobodyHere Jun 2015 #29
So he enjoyed their services throughout his life? Telcontar Jun 2015 #35
Several Biographies Are Worth A Read TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #38
That is about right, when Washington reached Boston in 1775 he was shocked... happyslug Jun 2015 #63
But he did not participate in secession over it treestar Jun 2015 #69
I believe it is more than a far stretch. I find it a preposterous notion. tymorial Jun 2015 #55
k and r niyad Jun 2015 #11
K&R Jamaal510 Jun 2015 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #13
Laws can be changed or amended. TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #18
Why don't we have a Fort Benedict Arnold? neverforget Jun 2015 #21
Excellent Points TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #24
Definitely not a great or even good general really. Plan A never survives the first shot so he neverforget Jun 2015 #25
Aha! TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #26
What about the Boot Monument???? happyslug Jun 2015 #62
I have often wondered about this. n/t MadrasT Jun 2015 #15
I always thought that was weird (nt) Recursion Jun 2015 #20
Excellent point and post indeed. nt MrScorpio Jun 2015 #23
Yes they should be renamed and an apology issued Kalidurga Jun 2015 #27
Camp Beauregard struggle4progress Jun 2015 #28
we're gonna have to sandblast the fuck out of Stone Mountain... n/t ProdigalJunkMail Jun 2015 #31
Wonder what folks opinion on the Taliban and ISIS destroying historical artifacts Telcontar Jun 2015 #36
Our military bases are not antiquities n/t JustAnotherGen Jun 2015 #39
Changing the name of a military base is equivalent to the Taliban's destruction bullwinkle428 Jun 2015 #42
Of course it is Telcontar Jun 2015 #43
Denying the government the ability to endorse a religion does not destroy that religion. LanternWaste Jun 2015 #51
Completely Wrong erpowers Jun 2015 #45
The statues they are destroying were of slavers and traitors? Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #44
Yeah, you might want to review the Sigalovada Sutta Telcontar Jun 2015 #52
LOL. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #53
Which specific monuments in the US are scheduled to be destroyed? LanternWaste Jun 2015 #56
Let us see now Telcontar Jun 2015 #67
Simple solution KamaAina Jun 2015 #48
used to live and work there... ProdigalJunkMail Jun 2015 #50
Very good post. K&R myrna minx Jun 2015 #32
What about nathan bedford forrest state park? DiverDave Jun 2015 #34
It should be renamed JustAnotherGen Jun 2015 #40
Remember George "Macaca" Allen, former LibDemAlways Jun 2015 #74
All the roads named after confederate generals also... boston bean Jun 2015 #37
NOLA activists have dealt with Jefferson Davis Parkway KamaAina Jun 2015 #49
Or towns - my hometown was named for the first Confederate commander to die csziggy Jun 2015 #54
I was stationed at Ft. Lee, Virginia.. kentuck Jun 2015 #41
It does seem peculiar to name military installations for enemy soldiers. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #46
The government took my mother's family farm to build A.P. Hill. malthaussen Jun 2015 #47
Until we take Andrew Jackson off the $20 bill, we're just being hypocrites.[n/t] Maedhros Jun 2015 #57
And Jefferson off the $2 bill 1939 Jun 2015 #59
At what point was Andrew Jackson a traitor to the US? rpannier Jun 2015 #64
Jackson Did a Little Something Called Genocide DrAlCarroll Jun 2015 #77
When he flouted the Supreme Court mwrguy Jun 2015 #78
I don't really care about "traitors" as much as I care about genocide.[n/t] Maedhros Jun 2015 #83
Michigan 1939 Jun 2015 #58
The deplorable ones should be renamed, but... JPZenger Jun 2015 #60
I'd certainly be in favor of no longer naming carriers after politicians... malthaussen Jun 2015 #61
Never did understand JackInGreen Jun 2015 #65
I must have been in high school 1939 Jun 2015 #66
General Grant and General Lee knew that it was time to end the war Always Randy Jun 2015 #68
Fort Homer Simpson TheOther95Percent Jun 2015 #70
Braxton Bragg 1939 Jun 2015 #72
Sorry but imo this entire topic is absurd. nt cstanleytech Jun 2015 #73
I don't have a problem with that DashOneBravo Jun 2015 #82
Close them down! B Calm Jun 2015 #84
Tom Tomorrow agrees with you d_legendary1 Jun 2015 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What About the Army Bases...»Reply #38