Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Message To Fundies Decrying The Supreme Court Decision As An Infringement On Their Religious Freedom [View all]

[font size="3"]Marriage Equality Does Not Affect Religious Liberty[/font]
June 28, 2015
by Julian Drury
Religious Conservatives love playing the victim, but with the recent marriage equality ruling, their rights are not being infringed upon
-snip-
... conservatives are trying to frame the issue as religion being infringed upon. The issue is clear by the SCOTUS ruling, however; no religious group is being forced to wed gay people. Churches are not forced by law to wed gay couples. The SCOTUS ruling merely deals with marriage certificates, the legal documents declaring someone married. Churches that do not condone gay marriage do not have to wed gay couples. However, state and local officials have to legally abide by and fulfill marriage contracts if applied for by gay couples.
The recent ruling does not threaten anyones religious rights. If you are a Christian and you dont agree with gay marriage, you are not obligated to have a gay wedding. If you are a church that does not condone gay marriage, you do not have to perform gay weddings. If you are a Christian and are opposed to gay marriage, your rights to bigotry are not threatened at all in this matter.
Marriage equality is purely a secular and practical matter that had to be settled legally. While conservatives scream about religious liberty and Gods law being attacked, they should be reminded of the First Amendment. We cannot base our laws on religious law, and in no way can or should we take religion into account when denying citizens their secular legal rights. No ones religion is threatened legally here.
If you morally disagree with the SCOTUS decision, then that is your choice. If your religion puts you in disagreement, that is your choice. But you have no legal right to enforce your religious doctrine on others by denying them their secular rights to marry. Marriage is as much a secular right of society as it is a religious right-of-passage.
read more: http://quietmike.org/2015/06/28/marriage-equality-does-not-affect-religious-liberty/
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Message To Fundies Decrying The Supreme Court Decision As An Infringement On Their Religious Freedom [View all]
napkinz
Jun 2015
OP
here's an example of one of those brilliant gimmicks ... a challenge to oppressed fundies
napkinz
Jul 2015
#54
they feel that if they can't impose their beliefs on others, they are being persecuted/oppressed
napkinz
Jun 2015
#16
I guess the "religious liberty" argument rested on individuals, like Court Clerks.
Beartracks
Jun 2015
#18
When a Baker or a Government Clerk denies service to a hetero couple for being previously divorced..
brooklynite
Jun 2015
#35