Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Taking on the Zombie Perot-Myth/Smear (With Maddow video) [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)11. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Wed Jul 22, 2015, 09:20 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Clinton did not win a majority in 1996 either.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7000029
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
sounds like a GOP talking point, straight out of the RNC.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jul 22, 2015, 09:33 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Please refute in reply, not by alerting jury.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: We have to hide things based on what they "sound like" now? No examples? No evidence? This is a Class-A Stupid Fucking Alert. This is a discussion forum. Discuss!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't get this alert at all.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's completely true.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Clinton did not win a majority in 1996 either.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7000029
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
sounds like a GOP talking point, straight out of the RNC.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jul 22, 2015, 09:33 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Please refute in reply, not by alerting jury.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: We have to hide things based on what they "sound like" now? No examples? No evidence? This is a Class-A Stupid Fucking Alert. This is a discussion forum. Discuss!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't get this alert at all.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's completely true.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How many elections in the last 125 years have a different popular vote & electoral vote winner?
ericson00
Jul 2015
#5
1800, 1828, 1932, 1980, 2008 those were realigning elections. If Clinton changed the electorate so
craigmatic
Jul 2015
#13
The reason the republicans stopped winning so many electoral votes is because
craigmatic
Jul 2015
#15
Most people don't consider 1968 realigning because policy didn't really change neither did
craigmatic
Jul 2015
#17
SCOTUS justices are the bare minimum of what we expect of a democratic president.
craigmatic
Jul 2015
#33
Also, if you, like me, are offended by the smear against the facts the Clintons,
ericson00
Jul 2015
#19