Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why Liberals Separate Race from Class [View all]
This is worth reading in entirety. Snips don't do this justice
Why Liberals Separate Race from Class
The tendency to divorce racial disparities from economic inequality has a long liberal lineage.
by Touré F. Reed
Demonstrators in the June 1968 Poor People's March in Washington, DC. Warren K. Leffler / Library of Congress
The horizontal organization of Black Lives Matter ensures a diversity of perspectives among participants and even branches. Nevertheless, the now-commonplace claim at the heart of the recent Black Lives Matter protests against Sanders is that white liberals have long reduced racism to class inequality in order to deflect attention from racial disparities.
This is not just wrong, but the formulation which ultimately treats race as unchanging and permanent rather than a product of specific historical and political economic relations undermines both the cause of racial equality in general and pursuit of equitable treatment in the criminal justice system in particular.
...
But by the 1950s, the anticommunism of the Cold War had a chilling effect on class-oriented civil rights politics, setting the stage for analyses of racism that divorced prejudice from economic exploitation the fundamental reason for slavery and Jim Crow. Indeed, this was the era in which racism was recast as a psychological affliction rather than a product of political economy.
...
This is why the March on Washington demands included not just anti-discrimination measures, but a full-employment economy, jobs programs, and a minimum-wage increase. Randolph and Rustin would go on to ally with economist Leon Keyserling to draft the 1966 Freedom Budget For All, which laid out a plan for social-democratic policies addressing black poverty by confronting its ultimate source the erosion of well-paying jobs for low-skilled workers that had once served as the pathway to the middle class for white people.
...
If one views the excesses and failures of the criminal justice system solely through the lens of race, then victims of police brutality and prosecutorial misconduct tend to be black or Latino. However, if one understands race and class are inextricably linked, then the victims of police brutality are not simply black or Latino (and Latinos outnumber blacks in federal prisons at this point) but they tend to belong to groups that lack political, economic, and social influence and power.
From that vantage point, the worldview expressed by Johnson and others misses the mark and falls into the same trap that, ironically, liberals have offered a stratum of credentialed black Americans for decades: opportunity within a market-driven political and economic framework that disparages demands for social and economic justice for all (including most black people) as socialist, communist, un-American, or even class-reductionist.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/bernie-sanders-black-lives-matter-civil-rights-movement/
The tendency to divorce racial disparities from economic inequality has a long liberal lineage.
by Touré F. Reed
Demonstrators in the June 1968 Poor People's March in Washington, DC. Warren K. Leffler / Library of Congress
The horizontal organization of Black Lives Matter ensures a diversity of perspectives among participants and even branches. Nevertheless, the now-commonplace claim at the heart of the recent Black Lives Matter protests against Sanders is that white liberals have long reduced racism to class inequality in order to deflect attention from racial disparities.
This is not just wrong, but the formulation which ultimately treats race as unchanging and permanent rather than a product of specific historical and political economic relations undermines both the cause of racial equality in general and pursuit of equitable treatment in the criminal justice system in particular.
...
But by the 1950s, the anticommunism of the Cold War had a chilling effect on class-oriented civil rights politics, setting the stage for analyses of racism that divorced prejudice from economic exploitation the fundamental reason for slavery and Jim Crow. Indeed, this was the era in which racism was recast as a psychological affliction rather than a product of political economy.
...
This is why the March on Washington demands included not just anti-discrimination measures, but a full-employment economy, jobs programs, and a minimum-wage increase. Randolph and Rustin would go on to ally with economist Leon Keyserling to draft the 1966 Freedom Budget For All, which laid out a plan for social-democratic policies addressing black poverty by confronting its ultimate source the erosion of well-paying jobs for low-skilled workers that had once served as the pathway to the middle class for white people.
...
If one views the excesses and failures of the criminal justice system solely through the lens of race, then victims of police brutality and prosecutorial misconduct tend to be black or Latino. However, if one understands race and class are inextricably linked, then the victims of police brutality are not simply black or Latino (and Latinos outnumber blacks in federal prisons at this point) but they tend to belong to groups that lack political, economic, and social influence and power.
From that vantage point, the worldview expressed by Johnson and others misses the mark and falls into the same trap that, ironically, liberals have offered a stratum of credentialed black Americans for decades: opportunity within a market-driven political and economic framework that disparages demands for social and economic justice for all (including most black people) as socialist, communist, un-American, or even class-reductionist.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/08/bernie-sanders-black-lives-matter-civil-rights-movement/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
95 replies, 16591 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (80)
ReplyReply to this post
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good understanding of this explosive issue that seems to have been influenced ...
AuntPatsy
Aug 2015
#2
Yep. I really do believe that was his first goal with his candidacy........
socialist_n_TN
Aug 2015
#42
There is a reason for D politicians Who have adopted a hybrid theory of governance
Dragonfli
Aug 2015
#26
How are you going to change the Police Department's antagonistic process,
Baitball Blogger
Aug 2015
#60
I don't see anyone here separating the two. Well, let me correct that. I DO see people here
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#45
I see people here who almost reflexively try to shift a racial injustice topic into an economic one
Gormy Cuss
Aug 2015
#46
What's really tiresome is to see such an enormous issue, ignored mostly by the same people
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#48
This analysis is mistaken, of course. It is, of course, from a socialist magazine ....
kwassa
Aug 2015
#33
+10^10^100. The piece is extremely poorly written and makes points that don't follow at all.
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#40
So are you ssaying that you do not support Economic Equality/Justice for minorities? That appears
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#47
"So are you ssaying that you do not support Economic Equality/Justice for minorities?"
NuclearDem
Aug 2015
#49
What does any of that have to do with fighting for economic equality? And just WHO has ever said
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#50
You are diverting the topic. This thread is about BLM, not income equality per se.
kwassa
Aug 2015
#53
The topic is 'why Liberals Separate Racism from Class'. That is what the title of the OP
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#55
It's not just the AA posters on DU. Huge majorities of black people everywhere have been saying this
Number23
Aug 2015
#87
I have to wonder if O.J. Simpson had been poor, not having celebrity and economic power would the
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#52
Nobody is saying it will, but economic justice will go a long way toward leveling the playing field.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2015
#58
Shameless bullshit allegation - and you know it is. Twisting the truth that they are sometimes
bettyellen
Aug 2015
#68
Who is "they"? It is just a charge being thrown about. Capitalism requires division, an hierachy
mmonk
Aug 2015
#41
You're right but that person will never be able to accept that. If you have bought into
stevenleser
Aug 2015
#90