Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
67. Oversight?
Tue Sep 22, 2015, 02:55 PM
Sep 2015
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/15/executive-order-using-behavioral-science-insights-better-serve-american

PRESS RELEASE
September 15, 2015

Executive Order -- Using Behavioral Science Insights to Better Serve the American People


A growing body of evidence demonstrates that behavioral science insights -- research findings from fields such as behavioral economics and psychology about how people make decisions and act on them -- can be used to design government policies to better serve the American people.

Where Federal policies have been designed to reflect behavioral science insights, they have substantially improved outcomes for the individuals, families, communities, and businesses those policies serve. For example, automatic enrollment and automatic escalation in retirement savings plans have made it easier to save for the future, and have helped Americans accumulate billions of dollars in additional retirement savings. Similarly, streamlining the application process for Federal financial aid has made college more financially accessible for millions of students.

To more fully realize the benefits of behavioral insights and deliver better results at a lower cost for the American people, the Federal Government should design its policies and programs to reflect our best understanding of how people engage with, participate in, use, and respond to those policies and programs. By improving the effectiveness and efficiency of Government, behavioral science insights can support a range of national priorities, including helping workers to find better jobs; enabling Americans to lead longer, healthier lives; improving access to educational opportunities and support for success in school; and accelerating the transition to a low-carbon economy.

NOW, THEREFORE, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, I hereby direct the following:

<>

MORE:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/15/fact-sheet-president-obama-signs-executive-order-white-house-announces
https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/09/15/designing-federal-programs-american-people-mind
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/20/opinion/sunday/cass-sunstein-making-government-logicalhtml.html
"I have no idea what that means, and I suspect he doesn’t either" arcane1 Sep 2015 #1
Yeah no kidding mindwalker_i Sep 2015 #9
hear hear! mike_c Sep 2015 #2
Colleges and universities are intended to be marketplaces of ideas. Maedhros Sep 2015 #3
Exactly. gobears10 Sep 2015 #4
I second this completely. hifiguy Sep 2015 #6
IMO this is on instructors/admin GummyBearz Sep 2015 #35
When I was at UCSC a decade or so ago, there was one right-wing Christian student who wrote nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #38
I loved the student newspapers at UCI and UCLA GummyBearz Sep 2015 #45
Few people are more passionately opinionated than college undergrads. nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #46
You have no clue about what college students are like, do you? DemocraticWing Sep 2015 #49
Exactly why I disagree with having protected political groups on DU. n/t A Simple Game Sep 2015 #13
Then you must be in favor of opening DU up to all political points of view, as well. Ms. Toad Sep 2015 #16
But you don't even have to be offensive to be banned from some groups on DU. A Simple Game Sep 2015 #24
Nice dodge. Ms. Toad Sep 2015 #31
I didn't intend to dodge anything, if you could point out this question you mention I will A Simple Game Sep 2015 #32
"Then you must be in favor of opening DU up to all political points of view, as well." Ms. Toad Sep 2015 #34
I am more socialist than liberal and am not a member of the Democratic party. A Simple Game Sep 2015 #37
Still avoiding the point. Ms. Toad Sep 2015 #59
When condi rice tried to speak, she was told to go away yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #30
Listening and asking questions is generally a better approach, I agree. nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #39
Incitement is a legal term, and the type of speech you're referring to branford Sep 2015 #47
I agree that peacefully protesting is the best way to counteract offensive speech. nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #62
If the students are attending a state institution, branford Sep 2015 #64
I guess for me, it's more a question of where the *students'* right to object ends. nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #65
The vast majority of college campuses, particularly state institutions, branford Sep 2015 #66
Great way of putting it. I agree. yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #48
Asking Questions? ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #57
Scalia did it, so why not Rice? nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #61
okay n/t. LeftOfWest Sep 2015 #55
I have many policy beefs with the POTUS hifiguy Sep 2015 #5
Exactly. Those who confine themselves to an echo chamber (which DU can be, somewhat, at times) nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #15
Well ok - only because 840high Sep 2015 #7
Mac user? n/t retrowire Sep 2015 #10
lol 840high Sep 2015 #11
was that Vox's title for the article??? no? Demonaut Sep 2015 #8
Oh snap Prism Sep 2015 #12
Unrec for disingenuousness. They took a perfectly reasonable statement and made it sound reactionary nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #14
Thank you for saying this, President Obama The Green Manalishi Sep 2015 #17
Dr. Jill Biden has hopefully gained his ear on this subject riderinthestorm Sep 2015 #18
I wonder how many people here didn't want to hear that. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2015 #19
Either way, it is to their benefit, whether they realize it or not. nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #40
I 100% agree. But protests are free speech too. tblue Sep 2015 #20
Does anyone understand what comes out of Ben Carson's mouth? Talk about lunatic. YOHABLO Sep 2015 #21
This academic fascism needs to be challenged LittleBlue Sep 2015 #22
yup yup gobears10 Sep 2015 #23
On the one hand, being "offended" shouldn't be sufficient reason to silence anyone's voice. nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #41
Universities should be hotbeds of unfettered free speech, protest, furious debate, and controversy. Nye Bevan Sep 2015 #25
Other than cases where "anti-P.C." is used as an excuse for deliberate bullying, I agree. nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #42
Seems like Vox crafted the "liberal political correctness" headline on its own. marmar Sep 2015 #26
Well said. n/t nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #43
Exactly. Starry Messenger Sep 2015 #50
Would this Ichigo Kurosaki Sep 2015 #27
What if you're too much about historical correctness to hear what they have to say? HughBeaumont Sep 2015 #28
Right to free speech =/= right to an officially sanctioned platform. n/t nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #44
Well,its good training for certain groups on DU tularetom Sep 2015 #29
One step up (OP) and two steps back (just on BloombergTV screen scroll, R-side in all caps) proverbialwisdom Sep 2015 #33
Oversight? proverbialwisdom Sep 2015 #67
Hell, some lobby in ATA to banish the Gungeon. Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #36
Disputes over commencement speakers don't tend to leave blood stains. ellisonz Sep 2015 #51
Pretty weak. But how you been doing, anyway? Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #60
Problem here is, it's not just that the students don't want to hear opposing views: graegoyle Sep 2015 #52
Good point. Why is everything about $$$$ ???? OneGrassRoot Sep 2015 #58
Good leftynyc Sep 2015 #53
This is the best example of cognitive dissonance Waiting For Everyman Sep 2015 #54
Not about being coddled - it's about not wanting my hard earned money to line the pockets RedCappedBandit Sep 2015 #56
Good point. Always be suspicious of "grass-roots" conservatism on campus. n/t nomorenomore08 Sep 2015 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vox: President Obama blas...»Reply #67