Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

CanSocDem

(3,286 posts)
152. Indeed.
Sat Dec 5, 2015, 04:18 PM
Dec 2015


I can't believe how many self-proclaimed science "experts" roam the halls of Democratic Underground attempting to silence those that even so much as mention the market influence on science.

Somebody up thread even went so far as to confuse standard marketing deceptions with 'bad science'.

Organic is a scam.
I saw just this week a half-gallon of "premium organic milk" in the local grocery, for $6.00.
How is it different from the gallon jugs of store brand milk?
Only one way. The price.
The gallon of store brand is about $2.50 a gallon.



.
Heck, this "tribunal" may even be in the Hague! Archae Dec 2015 #1
What is your opinion on Monsanto and the GMO? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #4
What difference does it make? Archae Dec 2015 #5
Gotcha. n/t darkangel218 Dec 2015 #6
GMO's use more pesticides and are making crops more resistant requiring more pesticides. tecelote Dec 2015 #17
GMOs reduce pesticide use, and super weeds are not a bigger issue with GMOs. HuckleB Dec 2015 #25
Don't be fooled. This is poisoning our land and our people. tecelote Dec 2015 #27
All of your links are about the same basic stuff, from Benbrook. HuckleB Dec 2015 #31
So it makes sense to you that we can keep pouring pesticides on our land with no adverse effects? tecelote Dec 2015 #37
,..That^ 840high Dec 2015 #38
Lots and lots of plants you eat produce natural pesticides and always have skepticscott Dec 2015 #40
Because they have always been safe. Centuries of testing. tecelote Dec 2015 #42
So then when you said "poison is poison" skepticscott Dec 2015 #50
Please list these "lots and lots" of plants Art_from_Ark Dec 2015 #259
not a list but an explanation Kali Dec 2015 #284
Oh, I understand that plants often produce natural insecticides Art_from_Ark Dec 2015 #289
ah, wasn't sure if you knew the process Kali Dec 2015 #297
So, you just ignore the fact that you made claims that don't stand up? HuckleB Dec 2015 #45
Weed Control Freaks? tecelote Dec 2015 #46
WCF is run by agricultural professors. HuckleB Dec 2015 #97
"Please post articles from a reputable source." Says the person who posted a Global Research link. EX500rider Dec 2015 #102
There are zero scientific papers in your insane list. Zero. NNadir Dec 2015 #33
OK. bvar22 Dec 2015 #41
For whom? For you? To prove a negative? NNadir Dec 2015 #179
Gish-Gallop. bvar22 Dec 2015 #183
You didn't ask a question. You lazily made an assertion that is, in fact, an attempt to... NNadir Dec 2015 #184
I don't care. I don't want to eat pesticides RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #132
Organic doesn't mean no pesticides Major Nikon Dec 2015 #140
Not in New York State RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #163
That's not even close to true. HuckleB Dec 2015 #165
Not the ones that I buy. n/t RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #168
Ah, you can think that. HuckleB Dec 2015 #169
Uh, I buy LOCAL organic food. RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #171
I've heard that claim so many times, it's not funny. HuckleB Dec 2015 #173
The people around here are my friends. RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #181
So first it was "New York State" and now it's "local" Major Nikon Dec 2015 #177
New York State IS local to me. RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #180
Oh no! Not the dreaded ignore! Major Nikon Dec 2015 #182
What you are describing is called the National Organic Program (NOP) Major Nikon Dec 2015 #176
In 2006, my wife & I moved to the Woods, far away from any Agri-Businesss or Industry, bvar22 Dec 2015 #142
You began to eat better, but that had nothing to do with it being marketed as organic. HuckleB Dec 2015 #143
Not true RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #164
Well, then it's placebo effect. HuckleB Dec 2015 #166
Ok doctor RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #167
It's got nothing to do with me. HuckleB Dec 2015 #170
Yes doctor RoccoR5955 Dec 2015 #172
Well, you don't seem to understand much about chemistry, biology, or agriculture. HuckleB Dec 2015 #174
Unfortunately for several billion people on the planet, those lacking decent nutrition levels... NNadir Dec 2015 #175
Strawman. bvar22 Dec 2015 #186
Since you don't know any scientists, or for that matter any science... NNadir Dec 2015 #316
A commercial for an organic grocery chain as "proof"? Nailzberg Dec 2015 #47
How long does you 1/2 gallon of 2% milk good for? maybe 2weeks LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #22
Ultra-heat pasteurization and aseptic packaging. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2015 #101
What difference does it make? carla Dec 2015 #28
Milk? SoLeftIAmRight Dec 2015 #30
I truly hope your health holds up archae, it sucks being sick! Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #189
What is your opinion on misleading news releases? jberryhill Dec 2015 #106
Read the article, no one is mislead anything. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #117
The article is very misleading, and that has been pointed out to you repeatedly. HuckleB Dec 2015 #156
I doubt Monsanto is the worst company out there. ZombieHorde Dec 2015 #354
Like we couldn't have "bananas and hamburgers" without GMO and pesticides! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #355
All cows are GMOs. ZombieHorde Dec 2015 #356
GMO stand for genetically modified oats. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #357
GMO stands for genetically modified organisms. ZombieHorde Dec 2015 #358
My banannas are not GMOs. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #359
Here's a little picture of a wild, non gmo banana. ZombieHorde Dec 2015 #361
That is exactly what they look like!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #362
I'll look for them the next time I go to the health food store. ZombieHorde Dec 2015 #367
The article tells a great big honking fib in the headline, to start. MADem Dec 2015 #351
Uh.....no. At least, not a real trial. jeff47 Dec 2015 #2
Here are those who are going after MON: darkangel218 Dec 2015 #9
That's not a list of organizations with good track records for accuracy and honest science. HuckleB Dec 2015 #19
So only those carla Dec 2015 #29
The organization at the OP link promotes all kinds of pseudoscience. HuckleB Dec 2015 #32
OMG - The Science SoLeftIAmRight Dec 2015 #34
That's a fine response to someone noting the ludicrous things promoted by MAM. HuckleB Dec 2015 #35
OMG - The Science SoLeftIAmRight Dec 2015 #36
OMG Marty McGraw Dec 2015 #103
Indeed. CanSocDem Dec 2015 #152
Monsanto and Dupont have poor records on protecting the environment. nt pnwmom Dec 2015 #196
That doesn't justify the use of deceitful organizations. HuckleB Dec 2015 #198
Monsanto and Dupont have been deceitful, just in different situations. pnwmom Dec 2015 #204
I'm not defending them. HuckleB Dec 2015 #207
Have they been proven in court to be dishonest, like Monsanto and Dupont? nt pnwmom Dec 2015 #211
So now you're defending dishonest organizations? HuckleB Dec 2015 #213
I'm asking if their dishonesty has ever been proved in court. pnwmom Dec 2015 #216
That's irrelevant. HuckleB Dec 2015 #217
There are levels of dishonesty. Apparently theirs doesn't rise to the levels of the GMO producers, pnwmom Dec 2015 #225
You keep telling yourself that. HuckleB Dec 2015 #228
And they're still not a court of law. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #71
The article speaks for itself. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #73
Yes, it does. And it does not back up the claims you are making. jeff47 Dec 2015 #75
The headline is from the article. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #78
Yes, their PR effort is also not telling the truth. jeff47 Dec 2015 #81
When the criminal or civil charges will be brought, yes they will be forced to testify darkangel218 Dec 2015 #83
You posted an OP with a title that is clearly misleading, no matter how much you pretend otherwise. HuckleB Dec 2015 #98
That group is not the one going after Monsanto. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #129
It appears that you can't answer the questions I pose. HuckleB Dec 2015 #133
Your concern is noted LiberalLovinLug Dec 2015 #147
You actually compared civil rights to anti-GMO propaganda? HuckleB Dec 2015 #154
I've been saying for a long time they need to be in prison. bkkyosemite Dec 2015 #3
+1 darkangel218 Dec 2015 #7
+2 CharlotteVale Dec 2015 #20
This sounds like the kangaroo court "Citizen's Grand Juries" that all found Obama guilty of treason. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #8
I'm sure it will be fair. cpwm17 Dec 2015 #10
some how I have a feeling that yuiyoshida Dec 2015 #11
Except this isn't the Hague, the International Court in that city. Archae Dec 2015 #14
Just maybe they could prosecute Dick 'n' Don? chapdrum Dec 2015 #12
This isn't the ICC. This is activists setting up their own court in the same city. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #72
International organizations, not just "activists". darkangel218 Dec 2015 #76
I did read the article. These are international organizations OF ACTIVISTS. jeff47 Dec 2015 #77
Yes, so? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #79
So Monsanto is not being put on trial. jeff47 Dec 2015 #82
Lol you keep going in circles. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #84
I'm afraid it's you who keep returning to the same point, hoping that this time it matters. jeff47 Dec 2015 #85
The article explains what the mock court will be doing very clearly. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #87
And then goes on to massively overstate the results. jeff47 Dec 2015 #88
Official charges will be brought against Monsanto darkangel218 Dec 2015 #89
No, they won't. HuckleB Dec 2015 #113
You only wish. Are you gonna have a sad when Monsanto will be officially charged?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #114
I don't defend Monsanto. HuckleB Dec 2015 #115
OMG! You have defended GMOs in every thread, ever since I've joined DU! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #120
Monsanto is a company. GMOs are plants developed using a particular technology. HuckleB Dec 2015 #122
Stop acting in which manner? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #124
My questions are clear. HuckleB Dec 2015 #131
Wish I knew your position on the GMO before I wasted my time going in circles lol darkangel218 Dec 2015 #90
So you admit that your stance is purely ideological. HuckleB Dec 2015 #138
Round-Up Ready -- for cancer TryLogic Dec 2015 #13
Did you seriously just link to mercola?... SidDithers Dec 2015 #15
Mercola. It figures. Archae Dec 2015 #16
Thanks for reminding me that I have to buy some more glyphosate Botany Dec 2015 #18
Thats just sad. n/t darkangel218 Dec 2015 #21
And so is the loss of lupines, monarchs, wood thrushes, and our native ecosystems Botany Dec 2015 #23
I am in favor of a mock trial of Monsanto even if it is merely a mock trial Jack Rabbit Dec 2015 #24
Suing farmers - the invisible elephant in the room MH1 Dec 2015 #92
It's pretty sad to see support of bad science and conspiracy theory purveying groups at DU. HuckleB Dec 2015 #136
Before there were these allegations swilton Dec 2015 #26
EXACTLY WHAT I WAS THINKING! Herman4747 Dec 2015 #39
Not just what it did... deathrind Dec 2015 #51
Yes, people are still dying because of agent orange. n/t darkangel218 Dec 2015 #74
Makers (Dow and Monsanto) of Agent Orange followed formula dictated by U.S. government HuckleB Dec 2015 #137
...and still being born. deathrind Dec 2015 #146
Awesome! Monsanto's criminal abuses deserve swift & sure justice. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #43
I'm a farmer.....lots of ignorance posted here Dickster Dec 2015 #44
Thank you for your post. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #86
Thank you for taking the time zalinda Dec 2015 #99
And what is your informed opinion skepticscott Dec 2015 #116
He failed to address exactly what method of weed control he utilizes, too. HuckleB Dec 2015 #118
Not everything in life is about costs. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #126
I care about not poisoning the planet. HuckleB Dec 2015 #135
And if he wants to spend more, let him admit skepticscott Dec 2015 #139
Indeed. -eom- HuckleB Dec 2015 #141
He failed to mention a lot of other things as well Major Nikon Dec 2015 #144
Id rather spray my fields with Roundup than "conventional" Atrazine. Elmergantry Dec 2015 #309
Quite misleading headline. Not a real court. yellowcanine Dec 2015 #48
I disagree. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #49
Not correct. tritsofme Dec 2015 #58
Because they need to figure out the charges which can be brought against Monsanto darkangel218 Dec 2015 #59
They don't get to make such a determination on charges tritsofme Dec 2015 #148
Sure.. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #149
Keep dreaming! I guess... tritsofme Dec 2015 #150
It all has to start somewhere. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #151
It's not starting anywhere. HuckleB Dec 2015 #155
DERP Kali Dec 2015 #52
Are you for or against GMO, Kali? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #55
I have a nuanced view of the matter. Simplistic, black-and-white thinking is not my style. Kali Dec 2015 #56
Ohh ..the personal attacks again darkangel218 Dec 2015 #57
the way you "asked" the question didn't warrant much respect Kali Dec 2015 #60
Because I already knew the answer, darkangel218 Dec 2015 #63
... Kali Dec 2015 #68
! n/t darkangel218 Dec 2015 #70
I wouldn't count on that. Texasgal Dec 2015 #61
Umm OK lol. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #62
like talking to a 2nd grader Kali Dec 2015 #69
I feel the same about you. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #80
K&R... spanone Dec 2015 #53
Good. deathrind Dec 2015 #54
Kick! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #64
Renaming my living room The Hague,... NCTraveler Dec 2015 #65
Yes I did. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #66
And BTW, Monsanto is not "a neighbours barking dog". darkangel218 Dec 2015 #67
Kick for visibility! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #91
Ah, a "trial" Recursion Dec 2015 #93
Bill and Hillary Clinton to be put on... meaculpa2011 Dec 2015 #94
Don't get fooled by the GMO issue, this is about business practices. haele Dec 2015 #95
YAY! Obviously the International Court has plenty of clear EVIDENCE to put the murderous company Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #96
Your post was alerted on Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #104
Oh, thank you thank you thank you jurists! Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #145
Mucho intersante Tab Dec 2015 #100
"International court" Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2015 #105
Lololol!!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #111
I support force feeding of GMOs to breast-feeding mothers by pitbulls at the Olive Garden. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2015 #153
Not "Pitt bulls and Olive Garden", but you surely support Monsanto and GMOs in dozens if not hundred darkangel218 Dec 2015 #157
The good doctor is quite accurate! HuckleB Dec 2015 #158
GMOs, yes. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2015 #159
See ya. I have no use in continuing a conversation with someone who calls other DUers darkangel218 Dec 2015 #160
Once again, you fail to be able to discuss the matters at hand. HuckleB Dec 2015 #161
Plenty of science to back up anti-gmo. But the pro-gmo crowd is more like the "Climate Change is a Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #190
You have it exactly backwards. HuckleB Dec 2015 #192
Actually, there's not. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2015 #194
"If you want to link to some actual peer-reviewed papers that aren't in pay-to-play publications Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #200
That's not what pay-to-play means. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2015 #202
Oh, my bad, Pay to Read/Access then. Think...Aaron Schwartz... Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #209
Good post. Thanks. immoderate Dec 2015 #107
Breaking News: Monsanto to Be Put on Trial NEAR the Hague for Crimes Against Humanity SidDithers Dec 2015 #108
YES! Faux pas Dec 2015 #109
About damn time... StandingInLeftField Dec 2015 #110
It's a mock trial, by anti FMO international organizations darkangel218 Dec 2015 #112
What penalty do these charges carry? (nt) TacoD Dec 2015 #119
They will determine the official charges at the mock trial. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #121
There are no actual charges. It's just a PR stunt. HuckleB Dec 2015 #123
It is not a PR stunt. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #125
That's complete nonsense MohRokTah Dec 2015 #127
Throw insults all you want. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #128
It's funnier what lengths anti-science people go to promote their anti-science. eom MohRokTah Dec 2015 #130
Nonsense. This group is a non-entity in legal circles. HuckleB Dec 2015 #134
Bye!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #178
Okay, great, you'll update is when a case is filed in an actual court? jberryhill Dec 2015 #205
K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #162
Good to hear . TheFarS1de Dec 2015 #185
K&R aspirant Dec 2015 #187
Exactly, Aspirant! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #188
Breaking: Natural News put on trial for crimes against science, educide in The Hague HuckleB Dec 2015 #191
Perfect! nt Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2015 #195
Satire. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #197
Yes, it's satire, which is more accurate than your OP. HuckleB Dec 2015 #199
In your own pro-GMO, pro-Monsanto mind maybe.. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #201
No, Monsanto Is Not Going On Trial For Crimes Against Humanity HuckleB Dec 2015 #203
Lolololol!!!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #206
No, Monsanto Is Not Going On Trial For Crimes Against Humanity HuckleB Dec 2015 #208
Now you're spammimg darkangel218 Dec 2015 #212
You already had me on ignore. What happened? HuckleB Dec 2015 #215
Mail ignore, since I've heard how you send cursing messages to posters darkangel218 Dec 2015 #218
You claimed to put me on ignore long before that. HuckleB Dec 2015 #221
You sent PMs before pnwmom darkangel218 Dec 2015 #226
Wow! HuckleB Dec 2015 #230
Recommend. nt Zorra Dec 2015 #193
No, Monsanto Is Not Going On Trial For Crimes Against Humanity HuckleB Dec 2015 #210
!!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #219
I was being honest. HuckleB Dec 2015 #220
You send PMs telling ppl" F..You" and youre saying you have been honest??? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #224
That's over them treating me like crap for years. HuckleB Dec 2015 #229
pretty funny Kali Dec 2015 #234
Over personal attacks, not GMO discussions! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #235
Looks like there's even more hypocrisy involved than is already seen by this OP, HuckleB Dec 2015 #236
she claims she is a nurse Kali Dec 2015 #270
Umm. HuckleB Dec 2015 #275
Are you saying I am not a nurse now?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #286
If you are, that's scary. HuckleB Dec 2015 #291
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Dec 2015 #292
BS, BSN, MS, NP. HuckleB Dec 2015 #293
I don't know in what world do you live, but ALL MY colegues on my floor are against GMOs! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #295
I doubt that. HuckleB Dec 2015 #296
No, YOUR status is scary. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #299
She wasn't just disagreeing with me. You don't know the first thing about it. HuckleB Dec 2015 #303
I'am asking you again for probr your attacks, darkangel218 Dec 2015 #306
I am making a fool out of myself, by bothering to address your foolish posts. HuckleB Dec 2015 #307
might want to get a cup of coffee or sleep this off a while Kali Dec 2015 #329
alerted 5-2 to keep Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #312
I guess they're working hard again, tonight. HuckleB Dec 2015 #314
wasted my time Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #315
I just wish the jury system was more consistent. HuckleB Dec 2015 #338
I don't "claim" I am a nurse, I AM a nurse. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #285
No, Monsanto Is Not Going On Trial For Crimes Against Humanity HuckleB Dec 2015 #222
This will result in a lot of irrelevant criticisms from Monsanto's colleagues and associates. LanternWaste Dec 2015 #214
Kick and rec! zappaman Dec 2015 #223
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Dec 2015 #227
A "trainwreck", like your opinion about the homeless?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #231
So logical fallacies are your thing. HuckleB Dec 2015 #237
Are you agreeing with what that poster said about homeless people? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #243
No, I'm not. HuckleB Dec 2015 #244
What content? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #247
Why are you asking me questions when you refused to answer mine? HuckleB Dec 2015 #249
I answered all your questions. And you accused me of saying the trial is official darkangel218 Dec 2015 #251
No, you didn't. Not even close. HuckleB Dec 2015 #255
Answer where did i say if was an official trial?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #300
How many times have you said the "headline is accurate?" HuckleB Dec 2015 #305
The headline is accurate because there will be a trail! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #308
Not in the actual Hague, and not in an actual trial. HuckleB Dec 2015 #310
You hate the Anti GMO movement so much, darkangel218 Dec 2015 #317
I don't lie, and I don't hate. HuckleB Dec 2015 #340
After you attacked my job, you and I have nothing to discuss anymore. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #342
That might matter, if you had actually answered my questions the other day. HuckleB Dec 2015 #343
Golly, you'd think if someone went to all that trouble they wouldn't selectively edit. zappaman Dec 2015 #248
So you admit you said what that poster copied and posted?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #252
Yup and will match your donation. zappaman Dec 2015 #254
You call homeless people unspeakable names... darkangel218 Dec 2015 #260
No I didn't. zappaman Dec 2015 #262
I googled most of them and it was from a poster with your name. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #266
Sure you did. zappaman Dec 2015 #269
Not all, but most. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #272
Like what? zappaman Dec 2015 #277
You have a "choice of words "... darkangel218 Dec 2015 #280
pfffffffffffffffffft PeaceNikki Dec 2015 #232
THIS really is the correct reply to the OP Kali Dec 2015 #279
YES! From the pro GMO folks! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #281
Well, maybe Monsanto will re-hire Shannon Watts to do PR... Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #233
Hehehe! That would be rich! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #238
From SustainablePulse: darkangel218 Dec 2015 #239
That's just the same stuff found via the OP. HuckleB Dec 2015 #240
I was told that you keep replying to me, even though I told you you were blocked darkangel218 Dec 2015 #241
I am not going to let conspiracy theory "content" go without a response. HuckleB Dec 2015 #242
Answer the question, why are you against labeling??? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #245
You left several unanswered questions above. HuckleB Dec 2015 #246
I never once once said this was a real trial. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #250
The headline clearly implies that. HuckleB Dec 2015 #253
The headline is correct, because there is a Monsanto Tribunal, darkangel218 Dec 2015 #256
Oh, brother. HuckleB Dec 2015 #257
Stop deflecting, no one here said it was an official charge, and you know it darkangel218 Dec 2015 #261
I'm not the one deflecting in any way, shape or form. HuckleB Dec 2015 #264
Sure you're not! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #265
I've already done that. HuckleB Dec 2015 #267
No you have not. Copy and paste where I said the trial was official?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #268
You seem to think you can go with that headline and pretend. HuckleB Dec 2015 #271
The headline is accurate , because they are going on trial! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #274
Yawn. HuckleB Dec 2015 #276
What about your stance against labeling?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #282
And now you try to deflect in another direction. HuckleB Dec 2015 #283
I asked you for proofbi ever said such things, you didn't answer darkangel218 Dec 2015 #287
Yes, I did. HuckleB Dec 2015 #290
No, you have not answered why you are against labeling . darkangel218 Dec 2015 #353
Just when I think there can't be any stupider posted on DU than what I've read today tammywammy Dec 2015 #258
Are you pro or against GMO, tammywammy? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #263
You keep insisting that they can bring charges. They can't. tammywammy Dec 2015 #273
They are assesing what official charges can be brought on INTERNATIONAL level against Monsanto darkangel218 Dec 2015 #278
"including RT!" tammywammy Dec 2015 #313
Yah, RT. Russia has banned GMOs. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #318
I have no idea what you mean by true colors. tammywammy Dec 2015 #321
How many other European countries are banning GMOs? Do you care about that?? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #322
bookmarking for future LOLs Kali Dec 2015 #288
Good idea! HuckleB Dec 2015 #294
Yup. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #302
If there's a reason for it to go down, great. HuckleB Dec 2015 #304
So all your other pro GMO threads, including Anti Labeling, darkangel218 Dec 2015 #324
Labeling makes no sense. HuckleB Dec 2015 #336
Self admitted Pro-GMOs will always laugh at this type of thread. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #298
nah, I just laugh at you Kali Dec 2015 #301
And i laugh at you, darkangel218 Dec 2015 #311
Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #325
You should be ashamed of yourself for the unwarranted personal attacks. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #326
I should be ashamed? how many time-outs have you been on? Kali Dec 2015 #327
You have attacked my job, saying I "was not a nurse" you have attacked my fiance!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #328
post links or everyone will suspect your accusations are just Kali Dec 2015 #331
Anyone can search for your attacks!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #332
You seem to do a lot of research on the posts of others. HuckleB Dec 2015 #344
FYI - jury results - RiverLover Dec 2015 #334
TY River and jurrors. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #335
Someone is making a lot of baseless alerts. Not cool. HuckleB Dec 2015 #339
Trial? No government is trying Monsanto. MineralMan Dec 2015 #319
It is a mock trial. Did you not read the article??? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #320
How can official charges follow? hack89 Dec 2015 #330
The ICC. n/t darkangel218 Dec 2015 #333
You really have not got a clue about this, have you? muriel_volestrangler Dec 2015 #363
They have no connection whatsoever with the ICC hack89 Dec 2015 #364
It's not plausible. It's just PR. HuckleB Dec 2015 #345
Wishing thoughts. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #348
Well, it is a mockery of real trials. MineralMan Dec 2015 #365
Hello? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #323
You'll wait a long time for me, sometimes. MineralMan Dec 2015 #366
Oct 7 - "Monsanto Tanking: Posts $495 Million Quarterly Loss and Plans to Eliminate 2,600 Jobs" RiverLover Dec 2015 #337
You might want to find a more honest source of information... HuckleB Dec 2015 #341
You might want to give up your pro Monsanto propaganda. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #347
HuckleB? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #352
TY! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #346
May they be tried! burrowowl Dec 2015 #349
Amen!!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #350
Kick!!!! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #360
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking News: Monsanto t...»Reply #152