General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thanks Skinner, YOU ROCK!!! [View all]Orrex
(63,203 posts)I read the post by LOonix, and I recall it to have been as described--a call to go on record as refusing to vote for Clinton in Nov 2016. That's kind of odd, considering how Sanders' supporters generally react to perceived "loyalty oaths" here on DU.
I also read Manny's post, and it was another exhortation to reject the Democratic nominee. Yes, it was sort of vague, in that sneaky quasi-satire style that made him so beloved by his fans, but the intent was clear enough to the Admins.
And I remember NYC_SKP's post as a rather unambiguous in unapologetic use of the word. Not a lot of wiggle room there. I've read multiple posts by his advocates claiming that he didn't "really" use the term, but they're unconvincing. NYC_SKP's meaning was clear and undeniable, and it's cowardly to pretend that he didn't "really" use or mean the term. In fact, I reread it just now, and it's every bit as clear as when he posted it.
If you feel that the PPRs (or their explanations) are bogus, then you should raise your objections in ATA.