Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: H2O Man DU:GD Poll [View all]

underpants

(182,788 posts)
4. Saudi Arabia - we've been close for a long time. Iran - in my opinion....
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:06 PM
Jan 2016

The Obama administration, from what I've read, started working on this the first week. Back in 2009.

I think there are two main reasons this was pursued:
1. It was time for Iran to open up. Much like Cuba this policy had clearly ran its course. We get access and inspection as to what exactly they are doing. They have no real military capabilities so they have kept their nuclear program as a preventive shield. They do have ties to organizations that we consider terrorists so we can stop any possible transfer of nuclear type weapons (unlikely) AND more windows open for our intelligence into those organizations.

2. The Ayatollah and the top staff know that their people want to join the 21st century. That's pretty much everyone but the old revolutionary crowd. The Iranians could keep them down but that is way more expensive than to not. Basically it's depressing civil disobedience on their part. They stay in power, there is not internal dissent to deal with, and they get overpaid for the supposed threat that they hold.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»H2O Man DU:GD Poll»Reply #4