Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tell Me Again How A Single Payer System Would Cost Too Much. [View all]Jarqui
(10,122 posts)29. Bureaucracy of the US system
http://obamacarefacts.com/single-payer/
The economic fat in the present healthcare is a BIG problem. Single payer is THE BEST at getting costs under control.
UK is single payer and so is Australia (not on the chart).
Americans could still overpay their doctors, nurses, etc and just reduce on "paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc"
If Americans don't like Bernie's approach (where he's trying to also fix income inequality), imagine reducing "paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc" and with it eliminate 28-30% of your healthcare premiums and deductible.
It's a no brainer. And when you do that, employing people is cheaper to help keep American jobs. American products cost less to make, etc. Americans have more money to spend that helps the economy. It's win, win, win and the only real losers are the health insurance companies and CEOs
If America spends about $1 trilllion on private healthcare, 30% is $300 billion less per year. Again, the only losers are the big heath insurance companies and CEOs
The United States has arguably one of the most bureaucratic health care systems in the world. Over 31% of every health care dollar goes to paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc. Because the U.S. does not have a unified system that serves everyone, and instead has thousands of different insurance plans, each with its own marketing, paperwork, enrollment, premiums, and rules and regulations, our insurance system is both extremely complex and fragmented.
In America, Medicare operates with just 3% overhead, compared to 15% to 25% overhead at a typical HMO. Provincial single-payer plans in Canada have an overhead of about 1%.
The economic fat in the present healthcare is a BIG problem. Single payer is THE BEST at getting costs under control.
UK is single payer and so is Australia (not on the chart).
Americans could still overpay their doctors, nurses, etc and just reduce on "paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc"
If Americans don't like Bernie's approach (where he's trying to also fix income inequality), imagine reducing "paperwork, overhead, CEO salaries, profits, etc" and with it eliminate 28-30% of your healthcare premiums and deductible.
It's a no brainer. And when you do that, employing people is cheaper to help keep American jobs. American products cost less to make, etc. Americans have more money to spend that helps the economy. It's win, win, win and the only real losers are the health insurance companies and CEOs
If America spends about $1 trilllion on private healthcare, 30% is $300 billion less per year. Again, the only losers are the big heath insurance companies and CEOs
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nobody can explain how a for profit system costs less than one run at cost....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2016
#14
Reporters always ask How You Gonna Pay for healthcare and very rarely about bloated military budget
Overseas
Jan 2016
#34
Most of those aren't single payer; the only single payer system has above-average costs
Recursion
Jan 2016
#22