Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,406 posts)
43. I personally think that SCOTUS is too high-profile to obstruct successfully (for the long-term)
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 09:18 PM
Feb 2016

When President Obama publicly nominates and promotes an obviously well-qualified and seemingly non-partisan/"non-threatening" nominee, the Republicans will have to twist themselves into all kinds of knots to explain why they won't even allow for a nomination hearing. Something tells me that they won't be able to hold out for a whole 10 months and if they do, the GOP is far from destined to win the WH next year, esp. if Trump is their nominee, so Hillary and Bernie will wind up nominating somebody when they take office and the GOP will have to eventually relent. They can't keep the seat vacant for years and they know that. Plus, institutional problems on the Supreme Court while the Republicans are pulling their shenanigans might put some pressure on them as well. Roberts might care about wanting a fully seated court to preside over and *might* convince his Republican buddies to give up on this nonsense. I just can't see this ending well for the GOP but we'll just have to all sit back and watch this farce play out.

They will give in on this, they can't be that obstructionist. Agschmid Feb 2016 #1
Don't say, "They can't be..." SeattleVet Feb 2016 #7
Obstructionism has gotten them this far madville Feb 2016 #19
Indeed. Romney's loss is the only DC setback they have suffered in the last five years. LonePirate Feb 2016 #28
Isn't that sort of like saying Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #42
Yeah, obstructing is pretty much all they do anymore. Zing Zing Zingbah Feb 2016 #39
We need to make the GOP pay a price for this Gothmog Feb 2016 #2
If the GOP is going to piss on the U.S. Constitution AxionExcel Feb 2016 #4
They can use it, but will voters really care? davidn3600 Feb 2016 #10
unfortunately G_j Feb 2016 #12
I don't believe that for a second brush Feb 2016 #3
They've got the recess appointment thing figured out KamaAina Feb 2016 #5
So they lose the election, which is going to happen anyway. This unconstitional blocking will help. brush Feb 2016 #9
No need to fear a recess appointment if they just don't recess. WillowTree Feb 2016 #6
So then they face losing the election. But they're going to do that anyway, and this will help brush Feb 2016 #8
Actually there have been.... davidn3600 Feb 2016 #11
Which is why I think they will yield and have a hearing brush Feb 2016 #13
"No president ever has been denied a SCOTUS appointment." NaturalHigh Feb 2016 #17
What? former9thward Feb 2016 #30
Appointments, yeah, but hearings on nominees? No. brush Feb 2016 #32
I meant appointment 'hearings' brush Feb 2016 #37
I guess we should thank them C_U_L8R Feb 2016 #14
If true, they GOP just gave us Congreff. Octafish Feb 2016 #15
How would they lose Congress over this? madville Feb 2016 #20
Good points. It seemed we snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Octafish Feb 2016 #25
They have some vulnerable senators up for re-election brush Feb 2016 #33
The Senate is possible madville Feb 2016 #35
I personally think that SCOTUS is too high-profile to obstruct successfully (for the long-term) Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #43
I just love slow pace constitutional crisis nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #16
they believe they have political cover thanks to Schumer and Biden's past remarks Macattack1 Feb 2016 #18
In spite of the obvious practical differences between the two situations. Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #44
win the senate back tapermaker Feb 2016 #21
the dems need to HAMMER THIS HARD....!!!!! spanone Feb 2016 #22
Unbelievable. Delphinus Feb 2016 #23
This may serve the eventual Democratic presidential nominee well... LanternWaste Feb 2016 #24
I hope Obama calls their bluff and nominates someone soon. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2016 #26
This is so arrogant! potone Feb 2016 #27
Not surprised marions ghost Feb 2016 #29
What can "we the people" do about it nt flamingdem Feb 2016 #31
Harry Reid needs to shut down the Senate. tinrobot Feb 2016 #34
The Senate has a constitutional duty to advise and consent. tabasco Feb 2016 #36
THe reality of Obama on the court comes one step closer to happening... Johonny Feb 2016 #38
It's real and it's fucking insane. This party needs to be cast away for all time. Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #40
Well they have 300 days to go...so I hope they are getting ready to dig in. Rex Feb 2016 #41
Yes G_j Feb 2016 #45
so what happens if another one bites the dust greymattermom Feb 2016 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: In Closed Door ...»Reply #43