Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Maybe with the vetting of Sandoval for SCOTUS is not the things many liberals to see,.... [View all]imanamerican63
(13,668 posts)8. This was my point that was making!
We are going to have fun watching the GOP squirm thru this process!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe with the vetting of Sandoval for SCOTUS is not the things many liberals to see,.... [View all]
imanamerican63
Feb 2016
OP
Triangulating with the GOP is what the public is sick of! They've already HAD IT with the TPP!
cascadiance
Feb 2016
#2
Yeah. Let's nominate someone even more extreme than Scalia, then we will have the Republicans
GoneFishin
Feb 2016
#28
Jesus Christ, it's been almost 8 years. Can we drop this '3 dimensional chess' bullshit, please?
Marr
Feb 2016
#23
Cool. Now explain how we unring the bell that a Democratic President should nominate a Republican to
merrily
Feb 2016
#31
Even at that point, the President can withdraw his nomination at any point before confirmation.
Chan790
Feb 2016
#21
We don't need this fscking game of a Democrat considering nominating ANY Republican to the SCOTUS.
merrily
Feb 2016
#32
No, I didn't. But the word "if" connotes that at least a possiblity of something exists
merrily
Feb 2016
#43
It was a brilliant move, but sadly too many here just want to bash the president without using
Liberal_Stalwart71
Feb 2016
#26