Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is why we are not about to be replaced by robots [View all]whatthehey
(3,660 posts)31. Just a wild guess, but your company's output has increased too perhaps?
It's hardly, I suspect, automation cet par driving increased headcount.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It seems Google is having difficulty integrating its AI with its physical robots...
Humanist_Activist
Mar 2016
#34
I disagree. Google translate can simply convert words from one language to another
Kelvin Mace
Mar 2016
#53
practical robots that will start taking people's jobs??? It started happening ages ago.
Albertoo
Mar 2016
#64
There is a reason Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking are warning us about AI.
killbotfactory
Mar 2016
#11
But automation can only do certain tasks within very well defined parameters
Kelvin Mace
Mar 2016
#14
Automation is dramatically reducing the human labor required for many kinds of manufacturing.
cheapdate
Mar 2016
#9
Yes that is the crux of the problem, their ability to interpret important information
Rex
Mar 2016
#47
I'm inclined to agree with you and I work in an industry that seems to be trying to replace me!
A HERETIC I AM
Mar 2016
#21
You are being too literal. Humans have already been replaced "in vast quantities" by robots.
ieoeja
Mar 2016
#27
The list of jobs not requiring visual identification of different objects is not small
whatthehey
Mar 2016
#30
That's one area that human being excel in, but just because we excel at one doesn't mean...
Humanist_Activist
Mar 2016
#33
FFS, you sound like the people in 1905 who said man flying was a century away.....
Logical
Mar 2016
#58