Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
38. Its not actually in direct conflict
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

you are reading it as protectionistic
While I've been pro-union since my first job in the 80s,
I'm writing it from the perspective that we need to care about how our choices impact other people.

If you read more of my posts, I keep arguing that we should be understanding that people of good character can make different decisions.

I've been pro-union, pro-environment, pro-tolerance, anti-poverty my entire life.
I'm also concerned about the state of people in other countries....
My reading on international trade is that it helps alleviate poverty, especially for women.
Women are beginning to emerge from being chattel and a burden to their families to be sold into marriage slavery into people who have their own worth.

I don't diminish the suffering in the USA.
But I also don't overlook the suffering in other parts of the world.


k&r excellent post nationalize the fed Apr 2016 #1
read this Baobab Apr 2016 #45
Who'll stop the rain? highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #2
Excellent post. HeartoftheMidwest Apr 2016 #3
By midcentury i expect almost full unemployment Baobab Apr 2016 #46
Add to that the probable damage from corporate friendly trade deals.... HeartoftheMidwest Apr 2016 #50
There you go.. ReRe Apr 2016 #4
Will anyone in our corrupt government stand up TheFarseer Apr 2016 #5
Not as long as we keep voting for those corrupt politicians. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #35
How could Hillary fight her husband's trade agreement when it made him so popular around the world Baobab Apr 2016 #47
She won't even try. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #48
I am confused. You support Hillary and those that came for our shit. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #6
You aren't reading it closely enough Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #13
Actually there are a few who are trying.... Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #25
That stuff has less to do with neoliberalism than many other things do. Baobab Apr 2016 #60
I am happy to read your links Baobab... Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #64
Love your post Carolina Apr 2016 #62
Hugs Carolina!!! Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #63
the manufacturing jobs are coming back but they are going to be automated Baobab Apr 2016 #65
Neo-liberal "let the markets decide" PowerToThePeople Apr 2016 #29
Its a losing battle. most unskilled jobs will be gone in 15-20 years Baobab Apr 2016 #49
IT and Programming are Unskilled Jobs? FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #52
Its my understanding that by definition, the various programs that use L-1 visa holders are supposed Baobab Apr 2016 #59
Bless your heart. Of course you're confused. LanternWaste Apr 2016 #34
I protest on a much smaller scale trc Apr 2016 #7
I won't use self-checkouts either - LiberalElite Apr 2016 #8
Google just opened a new campus in India and was not allowed to buy a lawn mower Recursion Apr 2016 #17
and your point is? nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #18
That trying to preserve jobs that have been made obsolete by technology is a losing game (nt) Recursion Apr 2016 #19
I will continue to fight that "losing game" nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #20
Huge difference. laundry_queen Apr 2016 #27
NEVER use the self checkouts! TexasMommaWithAHat Apr 2016 #40
I agree Urchin Apr 2016 #57
I do that also. I would rather stand in line for a clerk than jwirr Apr 2016 #10
And here I thought it was just me DVRacer Apr 2016 #11
Me too! I won't ever use those damn self service things. OrwellwasRight Apr 2016 #14
I have been complaining since day one Skittles Apr 2016 #9
Yet you support Hillary. Confusing. 840high Apr 2016 #12
I've been pro people before it was fashionable Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #16
If only she wanted to improve things eom LiberalElite Apr 2016 #21
I have no doubt she does want to improve things Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #22
Really, the candidate of It's too hard! We can't! LiberalElite Apr 2016 #23
Huge +1! Enthusiast Apr 2016 #32
+2 bahrbearian Apr 2016 #36
Trade agreements and cutting Social Security? No thanks n/t eridani Apr 2016 #30
They can inflate the money supply without you noticing, because of cheap imports Urchin Apr 2016 #15
The price of food has skyrocketed, too! TexasMommaWithAHat Apr 2016 #41
If they shrink product sizes any further they'll be miniature Doremus Apr 2016 #54
They didn't do anything Egnever Apr 2016 #24
Yes. It's been going on my whole adult life. rusty quoin Apr 2016 #26
Heard from my little brother today Bayard Apr 2016 #28
New. World. Order. Eat your peas. Enthusiast Apr 2016 #31
While the price of tchotchkes went down, necessities skyrocketed . . . HughBeaumont Apr 2016 #33
Interesting abelenkpe Apr 2016 #37
Its not actually in direct conflict Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #38
Well, thats what the trade deals do, they effectuate a massive redistribution of wealth away from th Baobab Apr 2016 #61
You want to help the world? Urchin Apr 2016 #55
Really depends on whose ox is being gored, heh? TexasMommaWithAHat Apr 2016 #39
I want to change how our government spends our tax money Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #42
UBI is the answer. forjusticethunders Apr 2016 #43
It would certainly help nt Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #44
You can have a impact on this issue! Soxfan58 Apr 2016 #51
~ FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE MFG. JOBS..NOTE TO COPY. appalachiablue Apr 2016 #53
I have been wanting to REc this for days. Now done. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #56
The xenophobia is real with this one. joshcryer Apr 2016 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Update: First they took t...»Reply #38