Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Man faces hate crime charge in Scotland over dog's 'Nazi salute' [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(57,359 posts)41. More about that. First, what was the charge?
Good morning, progree.
U.S. Attorneys » Northern District of Mississippi » News
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorneys Office
Northern District of Mississippi
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, March 24, 2016
Second Man Pleads Guilty to Tying Rope Around Neck of James Meredith Statue on Ole Miss Campus
WASHINGTON A second man pleaded guilty to a federal civil rights crime for tying a rope and Confederate flag around the neck of the James Meredith Statue at the University of Mississippi. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Departments Civil Rights Division, U.S. Attorney Felicia C. Adams of the Northern District of Mississippi and Special Agent in Charge Donald Alway of the FBIs Jackson, Mississippi, Division made the announcement.
Austin Reed Edenfield, of Kennesaw, Georgia, pleaded guilty to one count of using a threat of force to intimidate African-American students and employees because of their race or color. Edenfield was charged by information shortly before the plea. His sentencing date has not yet been set.
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorneys Office
Northern District of Mississippi
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, March 24, 2016
Second Man Pleads Guilty to Tying Rope Around Neck of James Meredith Statue on Ole Miss Campus
WASHINGTON A second man pleaded guilty to a federal civil rights crime for tying a rope and Confederate flag around the neck of the James Meredith Statue at the University of Mississippi. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Departments Civil Rights Division, U.S. Attorney Felicia C. Adams of the Northern District of Mississippi and Special Agent in Charge Donald Alway of the FBIs Jackson, Mississippi, Division made the announcement.
Austin Reed Edenfield, of Kennesaw, Georgia, pleaded guilty to one count of using a threat of force to intimidate African-American students and employees because of their race or color. Edenfield was charged by information shortly before the plea. His sentencing date has not yet been set.
IANAL, but I think this is the specific statute:
Federal Civil Rights Statutes
....
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245
Federally Protected Activities
1) This statute prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference, or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person or class of persons because of their activity as:
a) A voter, or person qualifying to vote...;
b) a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States;
c) an applicant for federal employment or an employee by the federal government;
d) a juror or prospective juror in federal court; and
e) a participant in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
2) Prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin and because of his/her activity as:
a) A student or applicant for admission to any public school or public college;
b) a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by a state or local government;
c) an applicant for private or state employment, private or state employee; a member or applicant for membership in any labor organization or hiring hall; or an applicant for employment through any employment agency, labor organization or hiring hall;
d) a juror or prospective juror in state court;
e) a traveler or user of any facility of interstate commerce or common carrier; or
f) a patron of any public accommodation, including hotels, motels, restaurants, lunchrooms, bars, gas stations, theaters...or any other establishment which serves the public and which is principally engaged in selling food or beverages for consumption on the premises.
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245
Federally Protected Activities
1) This statute prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference, or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person or class of persons because of their activity as:
a) A voter, or person qualifying to vote...;
b) a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States;
c) an applicant for federal employment or an employee by the federal government;
d) a juror or prospective juror in federal court; and
e) a participant in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
2) Prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin and because of his/her activity as:
a) A student or applicant for admission to any public school or public college;
b) a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program, facility, or activity provided or administered by a state or local government;
c) an applicant for private or state employment, private or state employee; a member or applicant for membership in any labor organization or hiring hall; or an applicant for employment through any employment agency, labor organization or hiring hall;
d) a juror or prospective juror in state court;
e) a traveler or user of any facility of interstate commerce or common carrier; or
f) a patron of any public accommodation, including hotels, motels, restaurants, lunchrooms, bars, gas stations, theaters...or any other establishment which serves the public and which is principally engaged in selling food or beverages for consumption on the premises.
It's going to take more time than I have right now, but I suspect that others who have faced this charge and have been convicted have filed appeals. I'm further guessing that some of those appeals were based on the argument that the activities were protected speech. How those appeals turned out, I do not know, but Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 seems still to be in place.
You know how much I like to link to Federal documents, so here is a link to that:
18 U.S.C. 245 - Federally protected activities
Scroll down to "CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS (sections 241 - 249)."
Best wishes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your film, which Jewish groups did not find offensive, makes a good point...
Jeffersons Ghost
May 2016
#3
The Scottish police occasionally send out tweets reminding people not to post stuff that's "hurtful"
Nye Bevan
May 2016
#5
This is exactly why we don't, can't, and shouldn't outlaw "hate speech".
Warren DeMontague
May 2016
#13
Don't say that too loudly, or our resident authoritarians will call you a racist or something.
NutmegYankee
May 2016
#14
1st Amendment threads can get pretty fucking depressing around here, I agree.
Warren DeMontague
May 2016
#15
So you think its OK to put nooses around statues of black people,cry "fire" in a crowded theater,
progree
May 2016
#35
"shouting fire in a crowded theater" is perhaps the most torturously overused metaphor in existence
Warren DeMontague
May 2016
#52
And Holmes made that analogy to justify upholding the arrests of antiwar protesters.
NYC Liberal
May 2016
#59
How about a noose around the statue of James Meredith at the University of Mississippi?
progree
May 2016
#20
How about "fuck the bitches" or "fuck Hillary"?? If done to annoy one's girlfriend, its OK, right?
progree
May 2016
#17
It's everything in subjectively determining how much of an asshole the person saying the stuff is.
Warren DeMontague
May 2016
#51
It was in Scotland, where there isn't constitutional protection to "Gas the Jews" speech
progree
May 2016
#27
I doubt anyone could be prosecuted for saying "gas the Jews" in the United States.
Nye Bevan
May 2016
#42
Just be careful not to post anything "hurtful" and the police won't pay you a visit.
Nye Bevan
May 2016
#49
It protects the most unpopular or offensive opinions and speech, because they understood that
Warren DeMontague
May 2016
#68